Skip to content

Handheld Ultrasound-assisted Versus Palpation-guided Labor Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia

Handheld Ultrasound-assisted Versus Palpation-guided Labor Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04759547
Enrollment
84
Registered
2021-02-18
Start date
2021-03-05
Completion date
2021-12-25
Last updated
2022-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Analgesia

Brief summary

Parturients who need combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour analgesia are randomly assigned to two groups. For the handheld ultrasound-assisted technique group, ultrasound with 3D navigation function is used to determine the needle insertion point and the insertion angle. For the conventional palpation-guided technique group, the interspinous space is detected by palpation. Procedure time, the number of needle passes, the number of needle insertion attempts, success rate, and complications are compared.

Detailed description

This study aims to determine whether handheld ultrasound-guidance can reduce procedural time for labor combined spinal-epidural analgesia compared with conventional surface landmark-guided technique.

Interventions

DEVICEhandheld ultrasound-assisted technique

Ultrasound with 3D navigation function is used to determine the needle insertion point and the insertion angle.

OTHERconventional palpation-guided technique

The interspinous space is detected by palpation

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Adult parturients with ASA physical status classification I, II or III requiring a combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (local anesthetics hypersensitivity, coagulopathy, needle insertion site infection, etc.) * Difficulty in communication * Severe cardiac disease * History of spine surgery * Anatomical abnormality of the lumbar spine * Age under 18

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total duration of combined spinal-epidural procedureDuring procedureIdentifying time (time required to complete the preprocedural spinal ultrasound or the assessment by palpation) + Procedural duration (time from the initial Tuohy needle insertion through the skin to the completion of the threading of the epidural catheter)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural durationDuring proceduretime from the initial Tuohy needle insertion through the skin to the completion of the threading of the epidural catheter
Identifying timeDuring proceduretime required to complete the preprocedural spinal ultrasound or the assessment by palpation
Success rate at the first needle passDuring procedureSuccess rate at the first needle pass
Number of passesDuring procedureNumber of times the puncture needle was redirected without removing it from the skin
Number of needle insertion attemptsDuring procedureNumber of times the puncture needle was removed from the skin and reinserted
Need to use alternative methodsDuring procedureNeed to use alternative methods for success
Number of interspace levels at which the insertion was attemptedDuring procedureNumber of interspace levels at which the insertion was attempted
Success rate of dural puncture with needle-through-needle techniqueDuring procedureSuccess rate of dural puncture with needle-through-needle technique
Incidence of radicular pain, paresthesia, and bloody tappingDuring procedureIncidence of radicular pain, paresthesia, and bloody tapping during the procedure
Success rate at the first attemptDuring procedureSuccess rate at the first attempt
Procedural discomfort using 11-point verbal rating scaleDuring procedureDegree of discomfort during the procedure using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=no discomfort, 10=most discomfort imaginable)
Depth by ultrasoundDuring procedureDepth to the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex (LFD) as determined by ultrasound
Actual needle depth (cm)During procedureDepth of the needle when the epidural space and dural space are found (cm)
Failure of labor analgesiaWithin 2 hours after the procedureThe need to reinsert a new epidural catheter due to lack of sufficient analgesia within 2 hours of the primary insertion
Patient satisfaction using 11-point verbal rating scaleFrom the end of the procedure to deliveryPatient satisfaction with the quality of labor analgesia using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=very unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied)
Incidence of inadvertent dural punctureDuring procedureIncidence of inadvertent dural puncture
Incidence of postdural puncture headacheUp to 2 weeksIncidence of postdural puncture headache
Incidence of back pain postpartum at the site of epidural insertionUp to 2 weeksIncidence of back pain postpartum at the site of epidural insertion
Procedural pain using 11-point verbal rating scaleDuring procedureDegree of pain during the procedure using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=no pain, 10=most pain imaginable)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026