Skip to content

Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring in Real Life Study (CORRIDA LIFE)

Comparison of CGM in Non-randomised Real Life Study of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Systems in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04759495
Enrollment
187
Registered
2021-02-18
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2021-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Flash Glucose Monitoring, Hypoglycaemia, Time in Range

Brief summary

The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in real life practice during 24 weeks of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)

rtCGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.

DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)

FGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with T1D naive to rt-CGM and FGM * Type 1 diabetes for \> 1 year * ≥ 18 years old * CSII without automatic functions or MDI

Exclusion criteria

* previous rtCGM or FGM use * treatment with insulin pump with automatic functions * severe noncompliance * known severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema * lactation, pregnancy, or intending to become pregnant during the study * a condition likely to require MRI * use of acetaminophen-containing medication * unwillingness to use the study device for \>70% of time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)Up to 13 monthsDifferences between HbA1c values in the Run in period and after 12 month of follow-up and differences of HbA1c between groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic rangesUp to 13 months\<3.9 mmol/L \[70 mg/dl\] and \<3.0 mmol/L \[54 mg/dl\]
Percentage of time in target rangesUp to 13 months3.9-10.0 mmol/L \[70-180 mg/dl\]
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic rangesUp to 13 months\>10.0 mmol/L \[180 mg/dl\] and \>13.9 mmol/L \[250 mg/dl\]
Incidence of skin reaction, infection or hematoma at the site of insertion of the sensorUp to 13 monthsSkin reaction, infection or hematoma reported by patients
Mean sensor glucose concentrationUp to 13 monthsMeasured by rtCGM or FGM
Incidence of severe hypoglycaemiaUp to 13 monthsRequiring third-party assistance to treat
Incidence of severe ketoacidosisUp to 13 monthsRequiring hospitalization
Changes in glycemic variabilityUp to 13 monthsExpressed as the standard deviation

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026