Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), 89Zr- girentuximab, 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT, Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of 89Zr-labeled girentuximab (89Zr-TLX250) as a novel, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) targeted PET/CT tracer for the imaging of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of 89Zr-labeled girentuximab (89Zr-TLX250) as a novel, Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX) targeted PET/CT tracer for the imaging of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. TNBC patients are known to be rapidly progressive and have a poor prognosis. This poor prognosis is due to the lack of common breast cancer targets in TNBC. As TNBC expresses CAIX, this stuy will evaluate CAIX targeting by using a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody that recognizes carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) : 89Zr- girentuximab otherwise known as 89Zr-TLX250. Previous and ongoing studies have demonstrated the potential application of 89Zr-TLX250 as a new PET/CT imaging tracer for the detection of renal cancer. After establishing the TNBC targeting properties of the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT imaging tracer, it should be interesting to develop a new targeted therapy using TLX250- radiolabeled with a therapeutic radionuclide such as 177Lutétium.
Interventions
89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Monocentric, open prospective study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent obtained from the patient prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations. * Female or male, Age ≥ 18 years at time of study entry. * Primitive triple negative breast cancer proven histologically, defined according to the following criteria: * Estrogen receptors \<10%. * And progesterone receptors \<10%. * And Human Epidermal Growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) not amplified or not overexpressed. * Breast Cancer (BC) recurrence documented by conventional imaging and/or FDG PET/CT with at least one measurable metastatic lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and/or PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST). * Consent to use a contraception method for at least 30 days after administration of 89Zr-TLX250. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1. * Life expectancy at least 6 months. * Patient has valid health insurance. * Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations including follow up.
Exclusion criteria
* History of another primary malignancy except for basal cell carcinoma within the last 5 years. * Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to the planned administration of 89Zr-TLX250 or continuing adverse effects (\> grade 1) from such therapy (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version 5.0). * Planned antineoplastic therapies (for the period between IV administration of 89Zr-TLX250 and imaging). * Exposure to murine or chimeric antibodies within the last 5 years. * Previous administration of any radionuclide within 10 half-lives of the same. * Impossibility to hold lying motionless at least 1 hour, or known claustrophobia. * Serious non-malignant disease (e.g. psychiatric, infectious, autoimmune or metabolic), that may interfere with the objectives of the study or with the safety or compliance of the subject, as judged by the investigator. * Mental impairment that may compromise the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study. * Pregnant or likely to be pregnant or nursing patient. * Known hypersensitivity to girentuximab or desferoxamine. * Renal insufficiency with Glomerular Filtration Rate : GFR ≤ 45 mL/min/ 1.73 m². * Persons deprived of their liberty, under a measure of safeguard of justice, under guardianship or placed under the authority of a guardian. * Disorder precluding understanding of trial information or informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Total Lesions Detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Versus 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | The number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT is reported to assess the concordance for tumor lesion detection using 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG) PET/CT |
| Number of Brain Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of brain lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT. The detection performance of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT for identifying brain lesions has been compared. |
| Number of Breast Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of breast lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT |
| Number of Bone Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of bone lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT |
| Number of Lymph Nodes Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of lymph nodes lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT |
| Number of Lung Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of lung lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT |
| Number of Liver Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 5 days | Number of liver lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 5 days | Total tumor burden (whole body) detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT scan compared to that defined on 18FDG PET/CT used as the reference performed at day 3 (D3) and at day 5 (D5) |
| Number of Patient With Concordance Between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Uptake and CAIX Histological Expression | 5 days | Number of patients with a concordance between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT uptake and CAIX histological expression considered as positive or negative |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to 89Zr-TLX250 | 30 days | All Adverse Events related to 89Zr-TLX250 are reported and assessed using CTCAE v5.0 scale |
| Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Related or Not to 89Zr-TLX250 | 30 days | All Serious Adverse Events are collected between the 89Zr-TLX250 administration and 30 days after. They assessed using CTCAE v5.0 scale |
Countries
France
Contacts
Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ousest - ICO
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Pretherapeutic 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT
89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT: Pretherapeutic 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 12 |
| Total | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 6 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 6 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 68 years |
| Region of Enrollment France | 12 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 |
Outcome results
Number of Bone Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of bone lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Bone Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 102 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Bone Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 111 lesions |
Number of Brain Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of brain lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Brain Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 3 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Brain Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 1 lesions |
Number of Breast Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of breast lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Breast Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 25 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Breast Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 23 lesions |
Number of Liver Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of liver lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Liver Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 12 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Liver Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 19 lesions |
Number of Lung Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of lung lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Lung Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 17 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Lung Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 27 lesions |
Number of Lymph Nodes Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Number of lymph nodes lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Lymph Nodes Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 65 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Lymph Nodes Lesions Seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 74 lesions |
Number of Total Lesions Detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Versus 18FDG PET/CT
The number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT is reported to assess the concordance for tumor lesion detection using 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG) PET/CT
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Total Lesions Detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Versus 18FDG PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT | 264 lesions |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Total Lesions Detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Versus 18FDG PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 231 lesions |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to 89Zr-TLX250
All Adverse Events related to 89Zr-TLX250 are reported and assessed using CTCAE v5.0 scale
Time frame: 30 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to 89Zr-TLX250 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Related or Not to 89Zr-TLX250
All Serious Adverse Events are collected between the 89Zr-TLX250 administration and 30 days after. They assessed using CTCAE v5.0 scale
Time frame: 30 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Related or Not to 89Zr-TLX250 | 0 Participants |
Number of Patient With Concordance Between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Uptake and CAIX Histological Expression
Number of patients with a concordance between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT uptake and CAIX histological expression considered as positive or negative
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Number of Patient With Concordance Between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Uptake and CAIX Histological Expression | 7 Participants |
| Number of patients with no concordance between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET and CAIX histological expression | Number of Patient With Concordance Between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT Uptake and CAIX Histological Expression | 5 Participants |
Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT
Total tumor burden (whole body) detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT scan compared to that defined on 18FDG PET/CT used as the reference performed at day 3 (D3) and at day 5 (D5)
Time frame: 5 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT D3 | 41.01 cm3 |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT D5 | 37.42 cm3 |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT D3 | 41.21 cm3 |
| Number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT | Tumor Burden Volume by 18FDG PET/CT and 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT | 18FDG PET/CT D5 | 51.79 cm3 |