Skip to content

Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block In Lumbar Laminectomy

Ultrasound Guided Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-Operative Pain Management In Lumbar Laminectomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04757480
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-02-17
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2021-10-10
Last updated
2021-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erector Spinae Plane Block, Lumbar Laminectomy, Postoperative Pain, Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block, Ultrasound

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare the efficacy ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for post-operative pain management after lumbar laminectomy

Interventions

PROCEDUREThoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block (TLIP)

(20ml) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% on each side toward the LG-MF interface.

PROCEDUREBilateral Erector Spinae plane Block (ESB)

Will receive (20ml) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath) at the level of the eighth thoracic segment (T8).

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Seventy cases with herniated lumbar disc scheduled for lumbar single-level or multiple-level lumbar discectomy with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I or II aged between 21 and 60 years of both genders.

Exclusion criteria

1. Body mass index \>32 2. History of relevant allergy to any of the drugs used in the procedure 3. Previous lumbar spine surgery or back surgery with planed spinal fixation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of pain by visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at restFirst 24 hours postoperativePain scores will be observed and recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement. The scores will be recorded in the ward at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. VAS score from 0 to 10 (0: No pain, 10: The worst pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total rescue analgesics consumptionFirst 24 hours postoperative
The time to first analgesicFirst 24 hours postoperative
24-h morphine consumptionFirst 24 hours postoperative
Side effects associated with morphineFirst 24 hours postoperative
Degree of pain by visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at movementFirst 24 hours postoperativePain scores will be observed and recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement. The scores will be recorded in the ward at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h VAS score from 0 to 10 (0: No pain, 10: The worst pain)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026