Personal Satisfaction
Conditions
Keywords
Lithium disilicate, hybrid ceramic
Brief summary
the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two CAD/CAM materials, hybrid nano-ceramic and lithium disilicate ceramic, in the fabrication of anterior endocrowns in patients with anterior endodontically treated teeth. While the postulated null hypothesis of this study was that there will be no significant difference between the performance of hybrid nanoceramic and lithium disilicate anterior endocrowns in patients with endodontically treated teeth.
Interventions
PROCEDUREEndocrown
Endocrown
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with good oral hygiene * Patients having one or more endodontically treated molars that need prosthetic restoration. * Molars should have enough tooth structure for endocrown restoration with minimum 3 walls with thickness not less than 1.5 mm and gingival step placed supragingival * Fully erupted molars * Molars free of developmental defect * Healthy periodontium * Absence of periapical pathosis * Acceptable endodontic treatment and proper bone support
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with bad oral hygiene * Patients with active periodontal disease * Patients with missing teeth opposing to the area intended for restoration * Patients with parafunctional habits or psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | 2 years | Using Binary Visual Analogue scale (Satisfied/ not satisfied) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Shade matching | 2 years | Using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria (Modified USPHS)- categorical |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed