Skip to content

To Assess the Utility of the Point Digit in a Clinical Take-home Study

To Assess the Utility of the Point Digit in a Clinical Take-home Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04755790
Enrollment
13
Registered
2021-02-16
Start date
2020-05-18
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation; Traumatic, Hand

Brief summary

This study will allow us to assess whether the Point Digit confers functional and psychological benefit to persons with partial hand amputations in an unconstrained environment. The use of the Point Digit outside of the laboratory will allow for a wider variety of uses and for a more realistic simulation of the product being used in the field. This well-controlled trial (without randomization of subjects) will produce the first Level II-1 medical evidence in our field of partial hand prosthetic design as described by the 1989 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Furthermore, this study will provide important data to support providers who are requesting reimbursement from payers.

Interventions

Patient is fit with Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
Arm Dynamics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Point Designs
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Partial hand amputees with absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met. * Fluent in English * Individuals aged 18 or greater

Exclusion criteria

* Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation * Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation * Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation * Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon occupational therapist evaluation * Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) provides a comprehensive, performance based measure for upper limb prosthetic use with any upper-limb functional prosthesis at any amputation level through assessment of commonplace activities that take place in various planes of movement. Scale Title: Overall Performance. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. Scale Title: DASH Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates worse outcome.
Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a clinically validated hand function test. Originally developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses, the SHAP has now been applied to assessment of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Scale Title: Index of Function. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Title: EQ-5D-5L Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Baseline outcome measurements will be performed without a prosthesis Outcome measurements will be performed after the subject has been fit with a prosthesis at 3 different points in time: immediately post-fitting, \ 30 days post-fitting, and \ 60 days post-fitting Point Digit: Patient is fit with Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) provides a comprehensive, performance based measure for upper limb prosthetic use with any upper-limb functional prosthesis at any amputation level through assessment of commonplace activities that take place in various planes of movement. Scale Title: Overall Performance. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisCapacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)74.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
Primary

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) provides a comprehensive, performance based measure for upper limb prosthetic use with any upper-limb functional prosthesis at any amputation level through assessment of commonplace activities that take place in various planes of movement. Scale Title: Overall Performance. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: with prosthesis, immediately post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisCapacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)84.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Primary

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) provides a comprehensive, performance based measure for upper limb prosthetic use with any upper-limb functional prosthesis at any amputation level through assessment of commonplace activities that take place in various planes of movement. Scale Title: Overall Performance. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 30: with prosthesis, 30 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisCapacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)86.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Primary

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)

Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) provides a comprehensive, performance based measure for upper limb prosthetic use with any upper-limb functional prosthesis at any amputation level through assessment of commonplace activities that take place in various planes of movement. Scale Title: Overall Performance. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 60: with prosthesis, 60 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisCapacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)91.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Primary

Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. Scale Title: DASH Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisDisability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)29.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Primary

Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. Scale Title: DASH Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 30: with prosthesis, 30 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisDisability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Primary

Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. Scale Title: DASH Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 60: with prosthesis, 60 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisDisability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)15.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Primary

Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. Scale Title: DASH Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: with prosthesis, immediately post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisDisability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)21.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Primary

EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)

Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Title: EQ-5D-5L Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisEuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)84.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Primary

EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)

Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Title: EQ-5D-5L Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: with prosthesis, immediately post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisEuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)88.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Primary

EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)

Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Title: EQ-5D-5L Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 30: with prosthesis, 30 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisEuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)89.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Primary

EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)

Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Title: EQ-5D-5L Score. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 60: with prosthesis, 60 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisEuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)90.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Primary

Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a clinically validated hand function test. Originally developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses, the SHAP has now been applied to assessment of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Scale Title: Index of Function. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: with prosthesis, immediately post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisSouthampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)69.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Primary

Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a clinically validated hand function test. Originally developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses, the SHAP has now been applied to assessment of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Scale Title: Index of Function. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 60: with prosthesis, 60 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisSouthampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)75.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Primary

Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a clinically validated hand function test. Originally developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses, the SHAP has now been applied to assessment of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Scale Title: Index of Function. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: ~Day 30: with prosthesis, 30 days post-fitting

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisSouthampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)74.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Primary

Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) is a clinically validated hand function test. Originally developed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses, the SHAP has now been applied to assessment of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Scale Title: Index of Function. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Day 0: no prosthesis (pre-fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Prosthesis, Then ProsthesisSouthampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)70.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026