Skip to content

SMARTHEART Validation Study

SMARTHEART Validation Study. A Study to Assess the Accuracy and Validate Novel Smartphone and Wearable ECG Devices in Cardiovascular Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04755582
Enrollment
128
Registered
2021-02-16
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

wearable ecg, electrocardiogram

Brief summary

To compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.

Detailed description

Assess the effect of the following on the accuracy of the recorded ECG compared to a gold standard ECG: * Posture or position of the patient * Movement * Amount of hair on the ECG site * Skin condition (tone/dryness) Ability to detect a paced rhythm accurately A qualitative assessment of ECG devices, including the amount of artefact in the signal and ease of use of the device

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Leicester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Must have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English * Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with study requirements. * Must be over 18 years of age * Must be deemed clinically stable by their direct care team.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who do not have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English * Patients who are medically unstable, as defined by the patient's direct care team. * Patients who are unable to give informed consent * Patients who are deemed clinically unstable by their direct care team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of smartphone or wearable ECG devices compared to gold standard ECG devices2 hoursTo compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Movement2 hoursAssessment of changes to the ECG signal due to movement of the patient
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Amount of hair on the ECG site12 monthsAssessment of changes to the ECG signal due to amount of hair on the site of ECG electrode positions
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: - Posture or position of the patient2 hoursAssessment of changes to the ECG signal due to posture or position of the patient
Ability to detect a paced rhythm accurately.2 hoursAssessment of ability of ECG device to detect paced ECG complexes or pacing spikes
A qualitative assessment of ECG devices, including the amount of artefact in the signal and ease of use of the device.12 months
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Skin condition (tone/dryness)12 monthsAssessment of changes to the ECG signal due to different skin conditions on the site of ECG electrode positions

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactZakariyya Vali
z.vali@le.ac.uk01162502366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026