Skip to content

Clinical Study on the Effect of a Synbiotic on Body Fat Mass

Randomised, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Study on the Effect of a Synbiotic on Body Fat Mass, Weight Management, Metabolic Syndrome and Other Risk Factors for CVD and Diabetes, on Fecal Microbiota and Adverse Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04754464
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-02-15
Start date
2020-05-13
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2022-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, Abdominal, Obesity, Visceral, Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

synbiotic, body fat mass, metabolic syndrome, diabetes

Brief summary

In this trial the effect of a synbiotic consisting of the three different strains of Lactobacillus fermentum and acacia gum (gum arabic) on body fat mass, body weight, long-term glycemia, insulin resistance and other risk factors for CVD and diabetes in overweight type 2 diabetics is investigated.

Detailed description

The effects of probiotics on glucose and lipid metabolism, on body fat, weight, visceral fat and liver steatosis were shown by several meta-analyses for the total variety, as described above. Some probiotic species/strains, however, seem to be more efficacious. The lactobacilli used in this trial were selected for their anti-inflammatory properties and based on induction of defensins in enterocytes. Therefore, one may expect more pronounced effects of these strains on traits of the metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low grade inflammation, than those found in the meta-analyses for the whole variety of probiotics without discriminating species and strain specificity. The combination of these Lactobacillus strains with acacia gum is expected to enable even more pronounce effects, since acacia gum was shown to increase the number of lactobacilli in the gut and, hence, are supposed to promote their propagation and, hence their effects. The dosage of 10 g/day acacia gum was demonstrated to be sufficient for enhancing fecal lactobacilli and bifidobacterial.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTsynbiotic

Consumption of 6 g powder consisting of the strains Lactobacillus fermentum K7-Lb1, L. fermentum K8-Lb1, L. fermentum K11-Lb3, acacia gum (gum arabic), maltodextrin, sucralose and flavour twice a day resolved in water

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTmicrocrystalline cellulose

Consumption of 6 g powder containing microcrystalline cellulose, maltodextrin , sucralose and flavour twice a day, resolved in water

Sponsors

Clinical Research Center Kiel GmbH
CollaboratorOTHER
Slimbiotics GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Placebo products are identical with verum in smell, flavour, color, texture, appearance, packaging (sachets) and labelling.

Intervention model description

Randomised, controlled, double-blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25) 2. Type 2 diabetes 3. Age ≥ 18 4. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Any of the following is regarded as a criterion for exclusion from enrollment into the study: 1. Subjects currently enrolled in another clinical study 2. Subjects having finished another clinical study within the last 4 weeks before inclusion 3. Hypersensitivity, allergy or intolerance against any compound of the test products (e. g. acacia gum) 4. Condition after implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or other active implants 5. Antidiabetic drugs except metformin 6. Any disease or condition which might compromise significantly the hepatic (ascites), hematopoietic, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, central nervous, cardiovascular, immunological, dermatological, gastrointestinal or any other body system with the exception of the conditions defined by the inclusion criteria 7. History of hepatitis B, C, HIV 8. History of or present liver deficiency as defined by Quick \< 70% 9. Regular medical treatment including OTC, which may have impact on the study aims (e.g. probiotics containing supplements etc.) 10. Major cognitive or psychiatric disorders 11. Subjects who are scheduled to undergo any diagnostic intervention or hospitalization which may cause protocol deviations 12. Simultaneous study participation by members of the same household 13. Pregnancy and lactation 14. Any diet to lose body weight 15. Eating disorders or vegan diet 16. Anorexic drugs and laxatives 17. Present drug abuse or alcoholism 18. Legal incapacity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BFM12 weeksBody Fat Mass (BFM) as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) (alteration V3-V1; verum versus placebo group)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1c12 weeksGlycated Hemoglobin
HOMA-IR12 weeksHOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA)-IR = glucose \[mmol/L\] x insulin \[µU/ml\]/22,5) as parameter for insulin resistance

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
WC12 weeksWaist Circumference
WHtR12 weekswaist-to-height ratio

Countries

Austria, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026