Skip to content

Cross-legged Versus Traditional Sitting Position for the Success of Epidural Analgesia During Labor

Impact of a Cross-legged Versus Traditional Sitting Position for the Success of an Epidural Analgesia Catheter Placement During Labor

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04754282
Acronym
IP3
Enrollment
457
Registered
2021-02-15
Start date
2021-02-24
Completion date
2022-03-26
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery

Keywords

Epidural anesthesia, Sitting position, Cross-legged position, Labour, Pain, Obstetric

Brief summary

The success of an epidural analgesia catheter placement depends on the parturient position. A poor posture can increase the number of punctures, patient discomfort, and risk of complications. An adequate position reverses lumbar lordosis, facilitating the access to the intervertebral space. In most cases, insertion of the epidural analgesia catheter is performed in sitting position or in lateral decubitus, the choice being generally guided by the preference of the anesthetist. According to anesthetists' experience in the obstetrical anesthesia unit at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital, a cross-legged sitting position is comfortable for parturients, restricts interfering movements during the procedure, and provides adequate widening of interspinous spaces. This position results in knees and hips flexion, tilting the pelvis backward and opening the interspinous spaces, while limiting muscular strain to maintain the position. However, literature on this matter is scarce. The aim of this study is to prove the superiority of the cross-legged position for successful placement of the epidural analgesia catheter at the first puncture without needle reorientation compared to a traditional sitting position on the edge of the bed.

Detailed description

Labour pain is one of the most intense pain known. To relieve this pain, epidural analgesia is both the most effective and the safest technique. An epidural analgesia catheter also allows for anesthesia in the event of the need for instrumental extraction or emergency caesarean section; it is thus recommended by learned societies. The 2016 national perinatal survey conducted by the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and the Directorate of Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (DREES) in France revealed that more than 80% of women had chosen to benefit from an epidural analgesia during labour. The first puncture failure rate ranges from 3% to almost 40% depending on the study. Identified factors for difficult epidural analgesia catheter placement were: non-palpable spinous processes, obesity, spine deformity, inability for the patient to maintain an adequate position and poor experience of the operator. The success of an epidural analgesia catheter placement depends on the parturient position. A poor posture can increase the number of punctures, patient discomfort, and risk of complications. An adequate position reverses lumbar lordosis, facilitating the access to the intervertebral space. Different positions have been described: the lateral decubitus, the traditional sitting position, and its variants such as the squatting position, the "hamstring stretch" position, the "pendant position" (with a bilateral axillary support) and more recently the cross-legged position. In most cases, insertion of the epidural analgesia catheter is performed in sitting position or in lateral decubitus, the choice being generally guided by the preference of the anesthetist. According to anesthetists' experience in the obstetrical anesthesia unit at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital, a cross-legged sitting position is comfortable for parturients, restricts interfering movements during the procedure, and provides adequate widening of interspinous spaces. This position results in knees and hips flexion, tilting the pelvis backward and opening the interspinous spaces, while limiting muscular strain to maintain the position. However, literature on this matter is scarce. The aim of this study is to prove the superiority of the cross-legged position for successful placement of the epidural analgesia catheter at the first puncture without needle reorientation compared to a traditional sitting position on the edge of the bed.

Interventions

OTHERPosition of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Traditional Sitting Position (TSP)

Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days. Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh. The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.

OTHERPosition of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP)

Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days. Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh. The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult women admitted to the delivery room and requesting an epidural analgesia during labour * Written informed consent * French speaking patient

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a contraindication to neuraxial analgesia * Impossibility for the patient to seat in a cross-legged position * No health insurance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epidural analgesia success rate20 minutesPercentage of epidural analgesia catheter placement success at first puncture without needle reorientation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient's comfort20 minutesVisual Analog Scale (VAS) comfort score (0 (maximum discomfort) to 10 (maximum comfort)) of parturients during the epidural analgesia catheter placement
Patient's pain20 minutesVAS pain score (0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)) of parturients during the epidural analgesia catheter placement
Epidural analgesia success rate in obese patients20 minutesPercentage of epidural analgesia catheter placement success at first puncture without needle reorientation in the subpopulation of obese patients
Successful rate of epidural analgesia catheter placement by residents20 minutesPercentage of epidural analgesia catheter placement success at first puncture without needle reorientation for epidurals placed by anaesthetist residents
Operator satisfaction20 minutesVAS satisfaction score (0 (maximum dissatisfaction) to 10 (maximum satisfaction)) of the operator in relation to the parturient's position during the procedure
Adverse event occurrence rate20 minutesPercentage of intra-vascular catheter position, dura-mater puncture, paraesthesia, hypotension after epidural analgesia initiation

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHawa KEITA-MEYER, MD, PhD

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

STUDY_DIRECTORKevin SEREY, MD

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026