Skip to content

Study of TER-101 Topical Ointment in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of TER-101 Topical Ointment to Assess Efficacy and Safety in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Atopic

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04753034
Enrollment
63
Registered
2021-02-12
Start date
2021-01-18
Completion date
2021-05-03
Last updated
2022-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This Phase 2 study will assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TER-101 ointment and vehicle twice daily for 28 days in adult and adolescent subjects with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.

Interventions

DRUGTER-101

Active Comparator

DRUGVehicle

Placebo Comparator

Sponsors

Teres Bio, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescent or adult subject aged 12 - 65 years. * Overall IGA score of 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate) at baseline on a 5-point IGA

Exclusion criteria

* AD with known hypersensitivity to excipients of TER-101 Ointment * Subjects who are immunocompromised

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in EASI From Baseline at Day 2929 daysEASI = Eczema Area and Severity Index, EASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the the numerical area affected into a single total score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). To calculate the EASI, the sum of the severity rating (0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe) for erythema, induration, lichenification, excoriation are multiplied with value of the area affected and with the percentage of the four body areas.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in EASI Over Time15 daysEASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single total score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). To calculate the EASI, the sum of the severity rating (0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe) for erythema, induration, lichenification, excoriation are multiplied with the numerical value of the area affected and with the percentage of the four body areas.
Change in IGA From Baseline Over Time29 DaysIGA = Investigator Global Assessment (Scale 0 - 4) 0 = Clear 1. = Almost Clear 2. = Mild 3. = Moderate 4. = Severe
Changes in Itch Over Time29 daysThe WI-NRS asks subjects to report their worst itch (maximal intensity) during the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 = no itch at all to 10 = worst itch you can imagine.
Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With AD29 daysSum of erythema, itch, and burning at the time of visit compared to baseline measured on a 0 - 3 scale for each component. A score of 0 indicates no erythema, itch or burning. Higher scores indicate worsening tolerability: 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TER-101
BID (twice daily) application TER-101: Active Comparator
31
Vehicle
Vehicle ointment, BID (twice daily) application Vehicle: Placebo Comparator
32
Total63

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalTER-101Vehicle
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
53 Participants24 Participants29 Participants
EASI8.22 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.73
7.97 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.424
8.47 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.016
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants27 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Overall IGA score
2 - mild
15 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Overall IGA score
3 - moderate
48 Participants23 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
17 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
36 Participants21 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
63 participants31 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants24 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Total body surface area7.5 Percent of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.69
7.2 Percent of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.58
7.8 Percent of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83
WI-NRS5.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.37
5.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14
5.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.58

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 310 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 313 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 310 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in EASI From Baseline at Day 29

EASI = Eczema Area and Severity Index, EASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the the numerical area affected into a single total score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). To calculate the EASI, the sum of the severity rating (0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe) for erythema, induration, lichenification, excoriation are multiplied with value of the area affected and with the percentage of the four body areas.

Time frame: 29 days

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 application of the study treatment and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The treatment group as assigned (randomized) was used for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
TER-101Percent Change in EASI From Baseline at Day 29-47.37 percent change
VehiclePercent Change in EASI From Baseline at Day 29-42.10 percent change
Secondary

Change in IGA From Baseline Over Time

IGA = Investigator Global Assessment (Scale 0 - 4) 0 = Clear 1. = Almost Clear 2. = Mild 3. = Moderate 4. = Severe

Time frame: 29 Days

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 application of the study treatment and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The treatment group as assigned (randomized) was used for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TER-101Change in IGA From Baseline Over Time-0.7 score on a scale
VehicleChange in IGA From Baseline Over Time-0.7 score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in EASI Over Time

EASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single total score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). To calculate the EASI, the sum of the severity rating (0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe) for erythema, induration, lichenification, excoriation are multiplied with the numerical value of the area affected and with the percentage of the four body areas.

Time frame: 15 days

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 application of the study treatment and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The treatment group as assigned (randomized) was used for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
TER-101Changes in EASI Over Time-35.96 percent
VehicleChanges in EASI Over Time-39.24 percent
Secondary

Changes in Itch Over Time

The WI-NRS asks subjects to report their worst itch (maximal intensity) during the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 = no itch at all to 10 = worst itch you can imagine.

Time frame: 29 days

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 application of the study treatment and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The treatment group as assigned (randomized) was used for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
TER-101Changes in Itch Over Time-2.0 score on a scale
VehicleChanges in Itch Over Time-1.2 score on a scale
Secondary

Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With AD

Sum of erythema, itch, and burning at the time of visit compared to baseline measured on a 0 - 3 scale for each component. A score of 0 indicates no erythema, itch or burning. Higher scores indicate worsening tolerability: 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe)

Time frame: 29 days

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 application of the study treatment. The treatment group for analyses was determined by the treatment received. If any TER-101 was applied, the participant was summarized under the TER-101 treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - severe0 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema -mild2 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - none20 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - moderate1 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - mild0 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - moderate7 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - moderate1 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - none17 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - severe1 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - severe0 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - none14 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - Severe0 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - mild6 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - none22 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - moderate2 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - mild7 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - severe1 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - mild3 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - none13 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - none15 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - moderate6 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - moderate1 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - severe0 Participants
TER-101Tolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - mild0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - none15 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - mild2 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - moderate2 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBaseline Erythema - Severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - none14 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema -mild5 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - moderate7 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADDay 29 Erythema - severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - none26 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - mild3 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - moderate1 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging baseline - severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - none24 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - mild3 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - moderate2 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADBurning/Stinging D29 - severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - none18 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - mild3 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - moderate2 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - Baseline - severe0 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - mild3 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - moderate10 Participants
VehicleTolerability of TER-101 Ointment vs. Vehicle in Subjects With ADPruritis - D29 - none15 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026