Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Functional Connectivity, Motor function, Quality of life
Brief summary
A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial will be conducted with 30 people with stroke, recruited at a referral hospital in João Pessoa. After recruitment they will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 - active stimulation and group - 2 sham stimulation. Participants will receive 10 sessions of ETCC, for 20 minutes, on alternate days (3 times a week), where the electrodes will be positioned over the primary motor cortex. 3 minutes of EEG at rest will be taken from each participant, and they will be instructed not to be actively involved in any cognitive or mental activity. In the first and last meetings, evaluations will be carried out, the outcomes evaluated will be: motor function, quality of life and functional connectivity.
Detailed description
Previous studies analyzed by systematic reviews suggest that the effects of ETCC may vary between subjects, where some stroke patients may not receive any additional benefits from therapy. Thus, it is necessary to use a biomarker that manages to elect those who will possibly benefit from the electric current. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate whether the EEG measures of functional connectivity of the target network of the stimulation are associated with the response to ipsilesional anodic ETCC in patients with stroke in the late subacute phase. as well as to observe if these findings can be associated with a clinical improvement of the patient. For that, a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial will be carried out with 30 people with stroke, recruited at a referral hospital in joão Pessoa. After recruitment they will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 - active stimulation and group - 2 sham stimulation. Participants will receive 10 sessions of ETCC, for 20 minutes, on alternate days (3 times a week), where the electrodes will be positioned over the primary motor cortex. 3 minutes of EEG at rest will be taken from each participant (Eyes open and eyes closed), and they will be instructed not to be actively involved in any cognitive or mental activity. In the first and last meetings, evaluations will be carried out, the outcomes assessed will be: motor function, quality of life and functional connectivity.
Interventions
Intervenção Ativa
Direct Current Transcranial Stimulation - Sham Intervention
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Participants will be divided into 02 groups: Active - participants who will receive real current; Sham - participants who will receive simulated stimulation. Participants will be included in the study using the eligibility criteria and will be randomly allocated, in 1: 1 blocks, where a random number generator will be used through an online randomization program (www.random.org). All researchers responsible for the evaluation before and after consultations will be blind to the type of treatment that the patient will receive (active stimulation or sham stimulation). The effectiveness of the masking mechanism will be assessed at the time of the last interview with the patients, when they will be asked about their opinions as to whether the electric current producing system was on or off.
Intervention model description
A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial will be carried out involving patients with ischemic stroke in the initial subacute stage, submitted to transcranial direct current stimulation sessions. This study will obey the SPIRIT guidelines, which is considered a guideline composed of minimum contents of a clinical trial protocol
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Have had a single episode of unilateral, ischemic stroke, in middle cerebral artery proven by means of magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography; * Young adult individuals, over 18 years old; * Both sexes; * Patients in late subacute stage. Late sub-acute stage will be considered for patients between 3 and 6 months after stroke; * Mild to moderate patients with a Fugl-Meyer score \>85 points; * Patients with mild to moderate degree of injury severity (NIHHS \<17 points); * Presentation of up to 4 points on the Rankin scale.
Exclusion criteria
* Use of drugs that modulate the activity of the Central Nervous System; * Carriers of implanted metallic or electronic devices; cardiac pacemaker; * habitual use of drugs or alcohol; * Epilepsy history report; gestation; people with traumatic brain injury or tumors.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Motor function | Baseline and after 3 weeks | For the analysis of the primary outcome, the fulgl-Meyer evaluation scale will be used. The scale consists of a cumulative numerical scoring system that assesses aspects related to range of motion, pain, sensitivity, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, in addition to coordination and speed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in quality of life | Baseline and after 3 weeks | To assess quality of life, the SF-36 questionnaire will be used, which is a multidimensional instrument, easy to administer and understand, translated and validated in Brazil, consisting of 36 items, encompassed in 8 scales: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, state general health, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects and mental health. It has a maximum final score of 100 points, where the higher the score, the greater the health status. |
| Functional Connectivity | Baseline and after 3 weeks | For the EEG record, the actiCHamp32 model, Brain Products GmbH®, with 32 electrodes will be used. During data collection, participants will be seated in a comfortable chair, where they will be instructed to keep their gaze turned to a fixation point, avoiding talking or moving, these measures will be adopted to try to minimize the possible artifacts that may exist in the EEG record. Participants will also be instructed not to engage in any cognitive or mental activity during the collection period. The data will be collected in an environment conducive to the acquisition (silent place, with adequate lighting) where only the participant and the researcher responsible for the collection will be present. |