Skip to content

A Study to Assess Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity Using an Acoustic Method

Assessment of Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity Using an Acoustic Method

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04752098
Enrollment
37
Registered
2021-02-12
Start date
2020-09-02
Completion date
2024-08-31
Last updated
2025-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Bone Disease, Neonatal Rickets, Osteopenia

Keywords

Bone Diseases, bone health, Fracture, infancy, Low Birth Weight Infant, mineralization, Neonatal, Pediatrics, Premature, ultrasound, Rickets

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to develop a new noninvasive ultrasound based technique, called vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), for evaluation of infant bone health with particular application in assessment of bone health in premature infants who are at risk for bone disease.

Detailed description

With increased survival of very low birth weight and premature infants over recent decades, bone assessment has become especially vital with the recognition of metabolic bone disease (MBD) of prematurity. Bone assessment became especially vital during last decades with the growing emphasis on metabolic bone disease of prematurity and low-birth-weight infants. Statistics shows that up to 50% of low birth weight and preterm newborns are likely to develop metabolic bone disease. Currently, no screening test has been shown to provide both sensitive and specific evidence of developing MBD over the first several weeks of life in the premature infants. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive tool for evaluation of infant bone health. This study will be conducted on premature infants at risk for MBD at multiple time points during their growth, with full term infants as controls. vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA) measurements will be done on the tibia. VAA measurements for the premature infants will be compared to those of full term infants. Performance of VAA in identifying osteopenia and its ability to monitor the response to treatment will be evaluated. The investigators will use an ultrasound system that has been used in the pilot study and employ a transducer with a smaller footprint for pediatric application.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), based on ultrasound radiation force

The study will develop and validate a new ultrasonic method for assessment of infant bone by evaluating structural and mechanical characteristics of the infant tibia. This project will utilize a novel, non-invasive method, vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), to evaluate infant bone properties in a wide frequency range while reducing the artifacts from soft tissue.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Children (Newborns born full term (males and females), and infants born preterm (males and females)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Days to 8 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Full term newborns, approximately equal number of male and female newborn, age \<28 days. * Preterm infants, approximately equal number of male and female preterm infants with gestational age at birth \<37 weeks or birth weight \<1500 grams.

Exclusion criteria

* Infants currently requiring continuous cardiovascular medication infusions, including but not limited to, dopamine, epinephrine, milrinone, and dobutamine (may have received these medications in the past. * Infants with major congenital anomalies that may affect bone health or structure. * For full term infants, infants with a history of intrauterine growth restriction or who are small for gestational age (\<10th percentile for weight) at birth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultrasound Transducer Compatibility1 yearSuccessful acquisition and integration of a pediatric transducer with a footprint ≤ X cm² and focal depth ≤ Y mm (to be defined based on commercial availability and anatomical feasibility).
Hydrophone Sensitivity and Size1 yearSelection and validation of a miniature hydrophone (e.g., diameter ≤ Z mm) with high sensitivity, characterized by its frequency response and minimum detectable pressure level.
Bandwidth Assessment1 yearMeasurement of hydrophone bandwidth (in MHz) as a primary indicator of sensitivity and signal capture quality.
System Performance Metrics1 yearQuantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution improvements compared to the previous setup using standard adult-sized components.
Feasibility in Preclinical Models1 yearDemonstration of the optimized VAA system's ability to produce high-resolution, reproducible images in a neonatal bone phantom or relevant preclinical model.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Bone Health Index (BHI)through the study completion, up to 3 yearsDerived from vibro-acoustic assessment (VAA) of the tibia in both term and preterm infants, BHI will be compared across age-adjusted groups to determine baseline differences between preterm and term infants.
VAA Sensitivity to Gestational Agethrough the study completion, up to 3 yearsCorrelation of VAA-derived parameters with gestational age at birth to assess the method's sensitivity in detecting bone development differences attributable to prematurity.
Longitudinal Changes in VAA Measurementsthrough the study completion, up to 3 yearsAssessment of VAA parameter changes over serial visits in preterm infants undergoing standard nutritional or medical interventions. Evaluates VAA's ability to detect improvements or deteriorations in bone status over time.
Comparison with Clinical Markers (if available)through the study completion, up to 3 yearsCross-validation of VAA findings with available clinical or biochemical markers of bone health (e.g., serum calcium, phosphate, ALP levels) to evaluate concurrent validity.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026