Skip to content

Serial Movement Assessment in Collegiate Athletes Who Perform Injury Prevention Training

Serial Movement Assessment in Athletes Who Perform Injury Prevention Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04748718
Enrollment
62
Registered
2021-02-10
Start date
2021-08-17
Completion date
2022-03-29
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury, Ankle, Injury, Knee, Injury Leg, Injury;Sports

Keywords

sport injury, injury prevention, neuromuscular control

Brief summary

Athletic injury can result in decreased athletic performance or removal from sport participation. There may also be psychological and financial impacts of athletic injury. Additionally, there can be long-term consequences, such as increased risk of subsequent injury or arthritis. Therefore, determining ways to prevent athletic injury from occurring is critical. Movement quality during sport is related to injury risk. Athletes who move poorly are generally at increased risk of injury compared to athletes who move well. Movement quality can be improved through exercise-based injury prevention training, thereby decreasing injury risk. This purposed of this study is to evaluate movement quality multiple times over the course of an athletic season in collegiate athletes who perform injury prevention training. The hypothesis is that movement quality will improve over the course of an athletic season.

Detailed description

Neuromuscular control, or quality of movement, during sport is related to injury risk. Athletes who move poorly are generally at increased risk of injury compared to athletes who move well. Neuromuscular control can be improved through exercise-based injury prevention training (called preventive training programs, or PTPs), thereby decreasing injury risk. Neuromuscular control is dynamic and therefore should be evaluated regularly; however, no study has serially evaluated neuromuscular control in athletes who perform PTPs. The overall objective of the proposed study is to longitudinally evaluate multiple aspects of neuromuscular control (i.e., movement quality, balance) across several time points during a single athletic season in collegiate athletes who perform PTPs. Therefore, two specific aims are proposed: Specific Aim 1: Evaluate neuromuscular control at multiple time points during an athletic season in collegiate athletes who perform PTPs. Specific Aim 2: Evaluate multiple measures of neuromuscular control over the course of an athletic season in collegiate athletes who perform PTPs. A field-based, experimental, cohort study will be used to address both specific aims. Subjects will be recruited from NCAA-Division III men's and women's soccer, volleyball and basketball teams. Neuromuscular control will be assessed four times during the athletic season using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). The LESS evaluates movement quality, while the BESS and the SEBT evaluate static and dynamic balance, respectively. Subjects will perform PTPs for about 10 minutes/day, at least 4 days/week.

Interventions

OTHERExercise-based injury prevention program

\ 10-minute, 4+ times/week exercise-based injury prevention program. Includes flexibility, strengthening, balance, agility and plyometric exercises.

Sponsors

Northern Vermont University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) Division III Athlete * Coach and athletic trainer elect to receive injury prevention services * Ages 18-24

Exclusion criteria

-Does not participate on NCAA Division III Athletic Team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Scoreassessing change over 3 timepoints: baseline (week 0), midseason (weeks 4-6), end-of-season (weeks 10-12)number of errors; scale is 0-17; lower score indicates better outcome
Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) Scoreassessing change over 3 timepoints: baseline (week 0), midseason (weeks 4-6), end-of-season (weeks 10-12)number of errors; scale is 0-60; higher score indicates worse outcome

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Injury Prevention Arm
Exercise-based injury prevention program: \ 10-minute, 4+ times/week exercise-based injury prevention program. Includes flexibility, strengthening, balance, agility and plyometric exercises.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInjury Prevention Arm
Age, Continuous19.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
height180.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
mass77.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) Score

number of errors; scale is 0-60; higher score indicates worse outcome

Time frame: assessing change over 3 timepoints: baseline (week 0), midseason (weeks 4-6), end-of-season (weeks 10-12)

Population: complete data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Injury Prevention ArmBalance Error Scoring System (BESS) Scorebaseline28.6 errorsStandard Deviation 5.9
Injury Prevention ArmBalance Error Scoring System (BESS) Scoremidseason22.5 errorsStandard Deviation 10.3
Injury Prevention ArmBalance Error Scoring System (BESS) Scoreend-of-season25.9 errorsStandard Deviation 7.3
Primary

Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Score

number of errors; scale is 0-17; lower score indicates better outcome

Time frame: assessing change over 3 timepoints: baseline (week 0), midseason (weeks 4-6), end-of-season (weeks 10-12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Injury Prevention ArmLanding Error Scoring System (LESS) Scorebaseline6 errorsStandard Deviation 1.8
Injury Prevention ArmLanding Error Scoring System (LESS) Scoremidseason5.8 errorsStandard Deviation 1.2
Injury Prevention ArmLanding Error Scoring System (LESS) Scoreend-of-season5.2 errorsStandard Deviation 1.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026