Upper Extremity Fracture
Conditions
Brief summary
to research the oxygenitaon effects of infraclavicular and interscalene blocks on the forearm.
Detailed description
To research the oxygenation effects of infraclavicular and interscalen blocks on the forearm by comparing the blood flow (BF) values using the USG, Perfusion index (PI) and Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values using the massimo device.
Interventions
PROCEDUREInfraclavicular Block
USI and neurostimulator guided infraclavicular block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
PROCEDUREInterscalen Block
USI and neurostimulator guided interscalen block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
Sponsors
Bulent Ecevit University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
The study will be a two-arm parallel assignment. One group will receive infraclavicular block and the other will receive interscalen block
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* aged between 18-65 * ASA Score I-III * undergoing elective or emergency arm, elbow and forearm surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Patient's refusal for Brachial Plexus Blockage * Patients who had any neurological disorders preventing the evaluation of the sensory block in the upper extremity, * Infection in the area to be blocked with ICB or ISB, * Non-cooperated patients * Patients with coagulopathy, * Morbidly obese patients * Patients with diabetes mellitus * Patients with hypertension * Patients with peripheral artery disease * Patients with allergy to the drugsto be used * Patients who had trauma in the area scheduled for the block * Paitens who had deterioration of anatomical integrity because of previous surgery * Pregnant women * Patients whose block failed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| oxygenation of the forearm | during the procedure three times | to compare the oxygenation of the forearm by measuring perfusion index device |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed