Skip to content

Early Administration of Vitamin C in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock in Emergency Departments

Early Administration of Vitamin C in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock in Emergency Departments: a Multicentre, Double Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial: the C-EASIE Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04747795
Acronym
c-easie
Enrollment
301
Registered
2021-02-10
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2023-11-15
Last updated
2024-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Sepsis, Severe, Septic Shock

Keywords

Vitamin C, ascorbic acid, sepsis, septic shock, RCT

Brief summary

In this clinical trial the effect of early administration of Vitamin C is investigated in patients admitted at the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock. When a patient has sepsis, his/her body is causing damage to its own tissues and organs as result of an infection. This can lead to septic shock. The patient has a low blood pressure, his/her organs stop working and the patient may even die. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficiency of Vitamin C in sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C is a vitamin present in various foods and has been approved as dietary supplement by the Belgian authorities. Over the years it has been proven that Vitamin C is very safe. In addition, several studies have shown that Vitamin C can also have a protective effect. It can reduce organ damage and increase survival rates. Although several studies suggest that Vitamin C can help fight sepsis, it is not yet used in practice. This Belgian trial, in which several hospitals participate, hopes to provide a clear answer to the question: Should Vitamin C be administered to patients admitted in an emergency department with sepsis or septic shock?

Interventions

DRUGVitamin C

IV

DRUGNormal saline

IV

Sponsors

Federaal Kenniscentrum voor Gezondheidszorg, Belgium
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has a 'suspected infection': this requires the combination of antibiotic administration and body fluid cultures within the first 6 hours after Emergency Department presentation. * Patient has a NEWS score ≥ 5.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient (≥18 years old) or legally authorized representative didn't provide informed consent. Delayed informed consent can be applied in cases where the patient is critically ill and no LAR is available. * antibiotic administration as a single dose or as a prophylactic treatment. * antibiotics administered without an accompanying body fluid culture according to the timeframe (within 6 hours after emergency department presentation). * 'Do no intubate' or 'comfort measures only' status. * Failure to randomize within 6 hours after Emergency Department presentation. * Weight \< 45 kg. * Pregnant or breastfeeding. * Known allergy for Vitamin C. * Known history of oxalate nephropathy or hyperoxaluria. * Known history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. * Known history of chronic iron overload due to iron storage and other diseases. * The patient is already on IV steroids for a reason other than septic shock. * Proven active COVID-19 infection (positive swab and/or CT scan positive for COVID-19 within 14 days prior to or at ED presentation). * Participation in an interventional trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score5 daysAverage post-baseline patient SOFA score, SOFA score range: 0-24, with 24 being the worst outcome (death)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum SOFA score5 daysMaximum SOFA score measured during 5 intervention period. SOFA score ranging from 0 to 24, with 24 begin the worst outcome (death)
Length of hospital stay3 monthsTotal length of hospital stay of the patient (including beyond intervention period)
Length of ICU stay3 monthsTotal length of ICU stay of the patient (including beyond intervention period)
Duration Vasopressors5 daysTotal duration where vasopression is required (hours)
Dosage Vasopressors5 daysTotal dosage of Vasopressors required (mcg/kg/min)
28-day mortality28 days
duration of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)5 daystotal duration of RRT (hours)
Ventilator days3 monthsTotal number of days the patient requires ventilator support (including beyond intervention period)
Steroids5 daysTotal dose of steroids given
Quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)3 monthsThe descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.
Time to return to work3 monthsTime to return to work of the patient after ED admission (in days)
need for Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)5 dayswas RRT needed

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026