Skip to content

imPlementing ROutine Molecular Characterization in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant ProstaTe Cancer by NGS

imPlementing ROutine Molecular Characterization in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant ProsTate Cancer by Next Generation DNA Sequencing (PROMPT-study)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04746300
Acronym
PROMPT
Enrollment
400
Registered
2021-02-09
Start date
2020-02-04
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2021-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Keywords

mCRPC

Brief summary

The PROMPT study aims to routinely implement genomic pre-sorting of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients for personalized treatment (e.g. immuno-, PARP inhibitors, or platinum-therapy). The investigators hypothesize that, by doing this early in the disease course (before exhausting standard of care options), it will improve treatment planning, patient outcome, quality of life, and reduce costs.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality in men worldwide. Approved therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include abiraterone and enzalutamide (targeting the androgen signaling pathway), radium-223 (bone targeting radionuclide therapy), and taxane chemotherapy. Controversy remains on optimal sequencing of available therapeutic agents, and these drugs are still commonly prescribed in a trial-and-error manner. Only a minority of patients receives the full benefit of the anticancer armamentarium, but all experience unnecessary side-effects, quality of life deterioration, and delay in onset to adequate life-prolonging treatment. In addition, the prescription of ineffective drugs and avoidable hospital admissions contribute to the financial burden of health care systems. In recent years, distinct molecular subsets of prostate cancer have been identified in mCRPC. These molecular defects may guide physicians in proper sequencing of medication and in predicting the individual response more accurately. In previous studies using next-generation sequencing (NGS) mCRPC patients could be grouped into clearly distinct molecular subtypes. Moreover, in these subtypes biomarkers associated with resistance to certain therapies, or biomarkers actually predictive for enhanced response were identified. In this study the investigators will introduce routine molecular characterization in participants with mCRPC as early as possible in their disease state. Participants will be screened before initiation of second-line treatment, since early identification will maximize clinical and financial benefit. Following screening, participants will be discussed in molecular tumor board and clinical meetings, and stratified to the agent they are most likely to respond to. Translational research is included to identify and validate additional predictive molecular biomarkers.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBiopsy

A biopsy will be taken from metastatic tissue, which will be used for DNA sequencing

PROCEDUREBlood sample

Blood samples will be taken for additional translational research

Sponsors

VGZ health insurance (NL)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Paul Speth Foundation (NL)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud Oncology Fund (NL)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male aged 18 or older with adenocarcinoma of the prostate defined by: Documented histopathology at diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of predominant or primary neuroendocrine histology. 2. Patients with a metastatic tumor site accessible for image-guided biopsy and allowing research analyses for this trial (e.g. biomarker testing by genomic, proteomic or transcriptomic assessment). A waiver can be made for patients presenting with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), and no easily accessible tumour for biopsy and suitable primary tissue available for NGS. 3. Castration-resistant state (defined as disease progressing despite \[chemical\] castration per PCWG3 criteria) 4. Progressive disease as either * A rising PSA on minimum 2 serial consecutive measurements * Radiographic soft tissue progression per RECIST1.1 or bone progression per PCWG3 criteria * Clinical progression 5. At least one metastatic lesion present at baseline CT, MRI, 68Ga/18F-PSMA PET or bone scan 6. ECOG Performance status 0 to 2 7. Serum testosterone on castration level 8. Adequate renal function: • MDRD-GFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m2 9. Adequate bone marrow function: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L * Platelet count ≥ 100 x109/L * Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 5.6 mmol/L 10. Adequate liver function: * Total bilirubin level ≤ 2 institutional upper limit of the normal (ULN) * Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) ≤ 3 x ULN (or ≤ 5x ULN in case of known liver metastases) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) ≤ 3 x ULN (or ≤ 5x ULN in case of known liver metastases) 11. Estimated life expectancy \> 12 months 12. Willing and able to comply to the research protocol 13. Signed, written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior chemotherapy and androgen receptor inhibition therapy related to castration resistant prostate cancer (one line of chemotherapy or androgen receptor inhibition may be given in the hormone-sensitive setting) 2. Active malignancy other than prostate cancer, except for patients with basal or squamous skin cancer. A waiver may be obtained from the PI in cases where the active malignancy is indolent and believed not to reduce mortality. 3. Imminent spinal cord compression based on clinical findings and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 4. Concurrent illness, including severe infection that may jeopardize the ability of the participant to undergo the procedures outlined in this protocol with reasonable safety 5. Presence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule, including alcohol dependence or drug abuse 6. Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in this observational study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responsiveness ratioThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Ratio of radiographic progression-free survival of personalized treatment or standard of care to the standard last line therapy (PFS-MPT-ratio vs PFS-SOC-ratio)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy endpoint: rPFSThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Radiographic progresssion free survival (per RECIST1.1)
Efficacy endpoint: PSA responseThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)PSA decline \>50% at 12 weeks or later
Efficacy endpoint: PSA-PFSThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Time to PSA progression (per PCWG3 criteria)
Efficacy endpoint: OSThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Overall survival capped at 1 year
Quality of life endpoint: EORTC-QLQ-30Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Score of EORTC-QLQ-30 questionnaire
Efficacy endpoint: ORRThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Best objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1 criteria
Quality of life endpoint: EQ-5D-5LThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Quality of life endpoint: BIP-SFThroughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Score of BIP-SF questionnaire
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); nr of linesAt the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)Averaged number of lines of standard care per year
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); costsAt the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)Averaged costs of standard care per year
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); treatment-related costsAt the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)Averaged costs of treatment-related resource utilization (e.g. admissions in ward or ICU) per admission and/or per duration
Quality of life endpoint: EPIC-26Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)Score of EPIC-26 questionnaire

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactNiven Mehra, MD, PhD
niven.mehra@radboudumc.nl+312410354
Backup ContactIris Kloots, MD
iris.kloots@radboudumc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026