Skip to content

A Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

A Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04745676
Acronym
SICG
Enrollment
36
Registered
2021-02-09
Start date
2021-03-25
Completion date
2023-07-12
Last updated
2026-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Brief summary

This is a pilot study to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a telehealth-delivered advance care planning intervention among 20 older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Detailed description

Older adults with AML and MDS are more likely to receive aggressive care and less likely to utilize hospice at the end-of-life. Advance care planning (ACP) intervention delivered through telehealth may improve patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care in this population. This pilot study seeks to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a telehealth-delivered advance care planning intervention. We will adapt the Serious Illness Care Program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTelehealth

Telehealth ACP intervention advance care planning intervention

BEHAVIORALControl

For the control arm, no telehealth visit will be scheduled.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for Patients: * Age ≥60 years (conventional definition of older age in AML/MDS) * AML or MDS diagnosis * Being managed in the outpatient settings * Able to provide informed consent * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

N/A Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers * Age ≥21 years * Selected by patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend, or caregiver with whom you discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters" * Able to provide informed consent * English-speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility - Retention Rate12 WeeksPercentage of patients, caregivers, and clinicians who consented to the study, ultimately completing all study components
Recruitment Rate12 WeeksNumber of patients, caregivers, and clinicians who are approached and agree to enroll.
Mean Usability of the Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention Using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)12 WeeksTelehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) - A questionnaire (22 questions scored from 1 to 7, a higher score indicates greater usability) assessing the usability of telehealth implementation across the population (for patients or caregivers), the mean of all questions is then calculated, range 1-7, with an average of greater than 5 considered usable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)12 WeeksGeneral Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A 7-item screening tool for anxiety (range 0-21, higher score indicates greater anxiety symptoms)
Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)12 WeeksPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A 9-item valid and reliable screening tool depression in the general population (range 0-27, higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms).
Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Distress Thermometer12 WeeksDistress Thermometer: A self-reported tool to screen for symptoms of distress, using a 0-10 rating scale (higher score indicates greater distress level).
Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu)12 WeeksFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu): Consists of 17 questions on the general module and 17 leukemia-specific questions, score ranges from 0-176, higher score indicates better quality of life).
Post-Intervention Mean Score for the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ)12 weeksHealth Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ): A questionnaire assessing patients' satisfaction with patient-oncologist communication (12 items, range from 12-60), higher score indicates greater satisfaction with communication.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKah Poh Loh

Univ. of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Center

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patient
The SICG program consists of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide as well as training and system-level support for physicians to conduct ACP conversations. Telehealth: Telehealth ACP intervention, advance care planning intervention For the control group, no telehealth visits were scheduled.
20
Caregiver
The SICG program consists of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide as well as training and system-level support for physicians to conduct ACP conversations. Telehealth: Telehealth ACP intervention, advance care planning intervention For the control group, no telehealth visits were scheduled.
6
Clinician
The SICG program consists of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide as well as training and system-level support for physicians to conduct ACP conversations. Telehealth: Telehealth ACP intervention, advance care planning intervention For the control group, no telehealth visits were scheduled.
9
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatientCaregiverClinicianTotal
Age, Continuous
Patient
75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants5 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient
White
17 Participants6 Participants8 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patient
Female
9 Participants4 Participants6 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patient
Male
11 Participants2 Participants3 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 200 / 60 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 60 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 60 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility - Retention Rate

Percentage of patients, caregivers, and clinicians who consented to the study, ultimately completing all study components

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Retention rate was focused for the patient and caregiver populations.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PatientFeasibility - Retention Rate19 Participants
CaregiverFeasibility - Retention Rate6 Participants
ClinicianFeasibility - Retention Rate10 Participants
Primary

Mean Usability of the Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention Using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)

Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) - A questionnaire (22 questions scored from 1 to 7, a higher score indicates greater usability) assessing the usability of telehealth implementation across the population (for patients or caregivers), the mean of all questions is then calculated, range 1-7, with an average of greater than 5 considered usable.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Usability was an optional assessment, and 3 patients opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. All caregivers answered the survey. The clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientMean Usability of the Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention Using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
CaregiverMean Usability of the Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention Using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Primary

Recruitment Rate

Number of patients, caregivers, and clinicians who are approached and agree to enroll.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: There are 29 patients analyzed because that many were approached, then 21 consented. One patient consented but withdrew before the intervention was initiated, leaving 20 enrolled participants. There were 7 caregivers approached, but 1 caregiver withdrew due to medical reasons. All 10 clinicians approached consented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PatientRecruitment Rate21 Participants
CaregiverRecruitment Rate6 Participants
ClinicianRecruitment Rate10 Participants
Secondary

Post-Intervention Mean Score for the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ)

Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ): A questionnaire assessing patients' satisfaction with patient-oncologist communication (12 items, range from 12-60), higher score indicates greater satisfaction with communication.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Health Care Communication Questionnaire was an optional assessment, and 2 participants opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. All caregivers completed the survey. The clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPost-Intervention Mean Score for the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ)18.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
CaregiverPost-Intervention Mean Score for the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ)18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Distress Thermometer

Distress Thermometer: A self-reported tool to screen for symptoms of distress, using a 0-10 rating scale (higher score indicates greater distress level).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Distress Thermometer was an optional assessment, and 3 patients opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. All caregivers completed the survey. The clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Distress Thermometer0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
CaregiverPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Distress Thermometer-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu): Consists of 17 questions on the general module and 17 leukemia-specific questions, score ranges from 0-176, higher score indicates better quality of life).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia was an optional assessment, and 2 patients opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. The caregivers and clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu)-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Secondary

Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A 7-item screening tool for anxiety (range 0-21, higher score indicates greater anxiety symptoms)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: General Anxiety Disorder-7 was an optional assessment, and 3 patients opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. All caregivers completed the survey. The clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
CaregiverPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Pre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A 9-item valid and reliable screening tool depression in the general population (range 0-27, higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was an optional assessment, and 3 patients opted not to complete the survey. Therefore, data was not collected. All caregivers completed the survey. The clinicians were not included in the population of this aim.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
CaregiverPre- and Post-Intervention Change of the Mean Score for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026