Skip to content

A Study to Investigate Safety of GS-248 and Efficacy on Raynauds' Phenomenon in Systemic Sclerosis

A Phase II, Randomized, Multi-center, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Investigate the Safety of GS-248, and Efficacy on Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP) and Peripheral Vascular Blood Flow, in Subjects With Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04744207
Enrollment
94
Registered
2021-02-08
Start date
2020-12-29
Completion date
2022-06-15
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Sclerosis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety, and evaluate the efficacy of GS-248 versus placebo on Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP) in subjects with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc).

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety, and evaluate the efficacy of GS-248 versus placebo on Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP) in subjects with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in multiple sites in 4 countries in Europe. Approximately 80 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to receive either GS-248 (120 mg) or placebo once daily. The study will comprise an enrolment period, a treatment period, and a follow-up period, with a total of 5 study visits over approximately 10 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGGS-248

120 mg, capsule, once daily for 4 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

capsule, once daily for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Ergomed
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gesynta Pharma AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must provide signed and dated written informed consent before the conduct of any study-specific procedures. * Male and female subjects aged 18-75 years inclusive. * Systemic Sclerosis diagnosed according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (van den Hoogen F et al. 2013). Subjects with signs of other autoimmune diseases (e.g. Sjögren's syndrome, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis) could be included if SSc is the dominating phenotype. * Raynaud attacks typically ≥7 times per week during the last 4 weeks prior to screening despite background medication (only allowed vasodilatory therapy is calcium channel blockers or PDE-5 inhibitors). * Women of childbearing potential must be using a highly effective method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for 4 weeks after the last dose of Investigational Medicinal Product in such manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimised. * Women must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. * Male subjects to agree to use condom in combination with use of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of \<1% to prevent pregnancy and drug exposure of a partner, and refrain from donating sperm from the first date of dosing until 3 months after last dosing of the IMP. * Ability of subjects to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic Sclerosis disease duration of greater than 120 months from first non-Raynaud manifestation * Current smokers or stopped smoking \<3 months prior to Visit 1. * Dose-change or initiation of vasodilating substances (calcium blockers or PDE-5 inhibitors) within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. * Use of iloprost or other intravenous (iv) or po prostacyclin receptor agonist within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. * Ongoing treatment with immunosuppressive therapies (other than mycophenolate) including, but not restricted to; cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or cyclosporine, or use of those medications within 4 weeks of trial entry. * Use of systemic corticosteroids during 4 weeks before screening and during the course of the study. * Concurrent serious medical condition, with special attention to cardiovascular conditions, which in the opinion of the Investigator makes the subject not suitable for this study. * Prolonged QTcF interval defined as a mean QTcF \>450 msec. * Creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min (determined by Cockcroft-Gault equation) at Screening. * Active digital ulcer (DU) within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. * Clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1), as determined and documented by the Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Number of Raynaud Attacks Per Week.From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectivelyPatient reported number of Raynaud's attacks per day as registered in electronic diary.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Raynaud's Condition Score.From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectivelyPatients reported Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) once a day in an electronic diary. RCS is a validated numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10) answering the question What difficulty did you have today with your Raynaud's condition? where a score of '0' = 'No difficulty', and a score of '10' = 'Extreme difficulty'.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain Experienced During Raynaud Attacks.From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectivelyThe patient reported the experienced pain of each Raynaud attack using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 in an electronic diary where '0'='No pain' and '10'='Worst imaginable pain'.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Mean Duration of Raynaud's AttacksFrom baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectivelyThe patient reported the start time (hh:mm) and stop time (hh:mm) of each Raynaud's attack in the electronic diary.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Cumulative Duration of Raynaud Attacks.From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectivelyThe patient reported the start time (hh:mm) and stop time (hh:mm) of each Raynaud's attack in the electronic diary.

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In addition to fulfilling all eligibility criteria, subjects must fulfil the following criteria to be randomised: •≥7 RP attacks during the last week of the run-in period as captured in the eDiary, with no more than 2 days without RP attacks. •Compliance with the eDiary during the 7 most recent days prior to baseline (Visit 2), excluding the visit day itself, defined as having submitted ≥5 days of eDiary records (out of a possible 7 days) for RCS and RP during that period.

Pre-assignment details

The run-in period was 14-21 days prior to Day 1, Baseline visit (the first dose of IMP). Of the 94 subjects enrolled into the study 69 subjects met the eligiblity criteria for randomization after the run-in period and were assigned to a treatment group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GS-248
Participants received GS-248, (supplied as 40 mg capsules) Each single dose consisted of 3 capsules constituting a total of 120 mg, once daily for 4 weeks GS-248: 120 mg, capsule, once daily for 4 weeks
33
Placebo
Participants received placebo, (supplied as 3 capsules), once daily for 4 weeks Placebo: capsule, once daily for 4 weeks
36
Total69

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
TreatmentAdverse Event12
TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGS-248TotalPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants
Age, Continuous49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants64 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
17 participants37 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
12 participants24 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants60 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Stratification factors FAS
Ca-blockers
18 Participants37 Participants19 Participants
Stratification factors FAS
No treatment
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Stratification factors FAS
PDE-5 inhibitors
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 331 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 339 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 331 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Number of Raynaud Attacks Per Week.

Patient reported number of Raynaud's attacks per day as registered in electronic diary.

Time frame: From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectively

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
GS-248Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Number of Raynaud Attacks Per Week.-3.41 number of attacks
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Number of Raynaud Attacks Per Week.-4.22 number of attacks
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-2.48, 4.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain Experienced During Raynaud Attacks.

The patient reported the experienced pain of each Raynaud attack using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 in an electronic diary where '0'='No pain' and '10'='Worst imaginable pain'.

Time frame: From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectively

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
GS-248Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain Experienced During Raynaud Attacks.-0.65 numeric rating scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain Experienced During Raynaud Attacks.-0.60 numeric rating scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Cumulative Duration of Raynaud Attacks.

The patient reported the start time (hh:mm) and stop time (hh:mm) of each Raynaud's attack in the electronic diary.

Time frame: From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectively

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
GS-248Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Cumulative Duration of Raynaud Attacks.0.70 LN (minutes); back-transformed
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Cumulative Duration of Raynaud Attacks.0.61 LN (minutes); back-transformed
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks

The patient reported the start time (hh:mm) and stop time (hh:mm) of each Raynaud's attack in the electronic diary.

Time frame: From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectively

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
GS-248Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks1.06 LN (minutes); back-transformed
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Mean Duration of Raynaud's Attacks0.89 LN (minutes); back-transformed
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Raynaud's Condition Score.

Patients reported Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) once a day in an electronic diary. RCS is a validated numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10) answering the question What difficulty did you have today with your Raynaud's condition? where a score of '0' = 'No difficulty', and a score of '10' = 'Extreme difficulty'.

Time frame: From baseline to week 4, i.e. the 7 most recent days prior to Visit 2 and Visit 4 respectively

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
GS-248Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Raynaud's Condition Score.-0.99 score
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Raynaud's Condition Score.-0.95 score

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026