Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04743622
Enrollment
57
Registered
2021-02-08
Start date
2019-04-30
Completion date
2020-09-13
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients : Phase 4, Parallel Group Design, Investigator-blind, Active-control, Randomized, Multi-center Study

Detailed description

Not provided

Interventions

preservative-free latanoprost 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes

preserved latanoprost 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes

Sponsors

Samil Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
CHA University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* IOP \>/= 15mmHg and \< 40 mmHg in each eye using Goldmann applanation tonometry at visit 2 * Written consent voluntarily to participate in this clinical trial

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with closed-angle, congenital glaucoma or secondary glaucoma caused by steroid drugs, etc. * best-corrected visual acuity 20/80 or less * Patients who have ongoing medical history of ocular inflammation * central corneal thickness is not in between 470um and 591um. * Patients who have received lacrimal duct procedure within the last 3 months or who have plans to have it. * pregnant or nursing women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal staining test(12-week-point)The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 5, the higher the worse)
Conjunctival staining test(12-week-point)The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)
Ocular surface disease index (OSDI)(12-week-point)The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire (0 to 100, the higher the worse)
Compliance check(12-week-point)Compliance of the drug administration has been check through the subject's self description (0 to 100, the higher the better)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tear break up time (TBUT)(4- / 12-week-point)The time taken from the last blink to the appearance of a black spot on the cornea after fluorescein dye staining. (second, numerical)
Corneal staining test(4-week-point)The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system(0 to 5, the higher the worse)
Limbal and bulbar hyperemia(4- / 12-week-point)The conjunctival hyperemia was assessed using Efron grading scales (0 to 4, the higher the worse)
Conjunctival staining test(4-week-point)The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)
Ocular surface disease indext (OSDI)(4-week-point)The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire(0 to 100, the higher the worse)
IOP (intraocular pressure)(4- / 12-week-point)IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. (numerical)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026