Skip to content

A Pilot Randomized Trial of Video-based Family Therapy for Depressed Home Visited Mothers

A Pilot Randomized Trial of Video-based Family Therapy for Home Visited Mothers With Perinatal Depressive Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04741776
Enrollment
166
Registered
2021-02-05
Start date
2021-04-22
Completion date
2023-11-14
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Family Conflict, Perinatal Depression, Postpartum Depression

Brief summary

Depressed mothers (pregnant and post-delivery) make up a significant portion of Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) clients. Home visited mothers often experience family conflict that precipitates or worsens their depressive symptoms. This study uses an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 design with a pilot randomized trial to test the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of an innovative family therapy intervention that uses technology to bypass barriers to increase access to treatment for this vulnerable population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALResilience Enhancement Skills Training

Family therapy

BEHAVIORALProblem-Solving Individual Therapy

Individual therapy

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mothers in any trimester of pregnancy through 18 months postpartum who are enrolled in home visiting at a participating agency; * Fluent in English; * Mother and her family member have at least an 8th grade education; * Mothers with Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition scores of at least 20; * Perceived Hostility Survey-Adult raw scores of at least 16 for the adult mother and her adult family member; Perceived Hostility Survey-Child raw scores of at least 14 for the adolescent mother and her adolescent intimate partner; and * Consistent internet access on their cell phones, tablets, or computer equipped with a microphone and camera.

Exclusion criteria

* Suicidal ideation in the mother and/or her family member; * Mothers with bipolar disorder symptoms; * Psychotic symptoms in the mother and/or her family member; * Mother is currently receiving individual therapy; * Family is currently receiving family therapy; * Mothers who have been taking an antidepressant for less than 2 months; and * Families with domestic violence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-upBaseline and six month follow-upMaternal depressive symptoms. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition scores range from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 63 (severe depressive symptoms). Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upbaseline and six month follow-upFamily conflict was measured using the Perceived Hostility Survey (Ages 18 +) and Perceived Hostility Survey (Ages 8-17). In both versions of the Perceived Hostility Survey, raw scores are converted to uncorrected T-scores. Scores one standard deviation or more below the mean (T ≤ 40) suggest low levels of perceived hostility and scores one standard deviation or more above the mean (T ≥ 60) suggest high levels of perceived hostility.
Change From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upbaseline and six month follow-upFamily cohesion was measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family with scores that range from 7-28. Higher scores indicate greater cohesion.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline and six month follow-upFamily cognitive reappraisal. Adult participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal scale (Adult version) with scores that range from 6 (infrequent use of cognitive reappraisal) to 42 (frequent use of cognitive reappraisal). Adolescent participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal scale (Children and Adolescents version) with scores that range from 6 (infrequent use of cognitive reappraisal) to 30 (frequent use of cognitive reappraisal).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maternal School Enrollment/Job AttainmentChange from baseline in maternal school enrollment/job attainment at 6 monthsAdapted item from ABCD study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Research staff obtained electronic consent of the IRB-approved consent forms for the eligibility screen and study enrollment from willing participants

Pre-assignment details

The mother, and her family member, were randomized to one of two study groups: 1) video-based family therapy (Resilience Enhancement Skills Training, REST), or 2) standard of care (Video-based Problem Solving individual Therapy, V-PST). REST is designed for participation by the dyad. By design, only the mother participated in V-PST sessions. The Enrollment number and Started/Completed number represents individual participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Video-based Family Therapy: Mothers
Resilience Enhancement Skills Training (REST) is the family therapy intervention. Mothers and their family members participated in REST sessions. Study measures were administered to each mother and her family member, separately.
42
Video-based Family Therapy: Family Members
Resilience Enhancement Skills Training (REST) is the family therapy intervention. Mothers and their family members participated in REST sessions. Study measures were administered to each mother and her family member, separately.
42
Standard of Care: Mothers
Video-based Problem-Solving individual Therapy (V-PST) is the active comparison condition. Only mothers participated in V-PST sessions. Study measures were administered to each mother and her family member, separately.
41
Standard of Care: Family Members
Video-based Problem-Solving individual Therapy (V-PST) is the active comparison condition. Only mothers participated in V-PST sessions. Study measures were administered to each mother and her family member, separately.
41
Total166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7101017

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVideo-based Family Therapy: MothersVideo-based Family Therapy: Family MembersStandard of Care: MothersStandard of Care: Family MembersTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants41 Participants40 Participants40 Participants162 Participants
Age, Continuous28.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
28.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
31.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants39 Participants41 Participants37 Participants159 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants12 Participants7 Participants11 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants25 Participants28 Participants25 Participants106 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 Participants42 Participants41 Participants41 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants5 Participants41 Participants13 Participants101 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants37 Participants0 Participants28 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 421 / 410 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 420 / 420 / 410 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 420 / 420 / 410 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-up

Family cognitive reappraisal. Adult participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal scale (Adult version) with scores that range from 6 (infrequent use of cognitive reappraisal) to 42 (frequent use of cognitive reappraisal). Adolescent participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal scale (Children and Adolescents version) with scores that range from 6 (infrequent use of cognitive reappraisal) to 30 (frequent use of cognitive reappraisal).

Time frame: Baseline and six month follow-up

Population: Participants who completed at least one session. By design, mothers' family members did not participate in Standard of Care intervention sessions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up31.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline23.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up32.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline28.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up30.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up34.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Cognitive Reappraisal on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Scale at Six Month Follow-upBaseline31.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Primary

Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-up

Maternal depressive symptoms. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition scores range from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 63 (severe depressive symptoms). Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and six month follow-up

Population: All mothers who attended at least 1 session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-upBaseline28.3 units on a scale (BDI-II)Standard Deviation 5.8
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-upSix Month Follow-Up6.9 units on a scale (BDI-II)Standard Deviation 4.9
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-upSix Month Follow-Up13.2 units on a scale (BDI-II)Standard Deviation 8.6
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition at Six Month Follow-upBaseline27.0 units on a scale (BDI-II)Standard Deviation 6.1
Primary

Change From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-up

Family cohesion was measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family with scores that range from 7-28. Higher scores indicate greater cohesion.

Time frame: baseline and six month follow-up

Population: All participants who completed at least one session. By design, mothers' family members did not participate in the Standard of Care intervention sessions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up23.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline20.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up24.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up19.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline19.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Family Cohesion on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Family at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline20.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Primary

Change From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-up

Family conflict was measured using the Perceived Hostility Survey (Ages 18 +) and Perceived Hostility Survey (Ages 8-17). In both versions of the Perceived Hostility Survey, raw scores are converted to uncorrected T-scores. Scores one standard deviation or more below the mean (T ≤ 40) suggest low levels of perceived hostility and scores one standard deviation or more above the mean (T ≥ 60) suggest high levels of perceived hostility.

Time frame: baseline and six month follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline58.7 T-score
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up44.2 T-score
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up46.3 T-score
Standard of Care: MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline60.1 T-score
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up52.9 T-score
Standard of Care:MothersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline60.1 T-score
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upSix month follow-up52.9 T-score
Standard of Care:Family MembersChange From Baseline in Family Conflict on the Perceived Hostility Survey at the Six Month Follow-upBaseline58.7 T-score
Secondary

Maternal School Enrollment/Job Attainment

Adapted item from ABCD study.

Time frame: Change from baseline in maternal school enrollment/job attainment at 6 months

Population: Mothers without circumstances that prevented them from obtaining employment and enrolling in school at baseline were included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersMaternal School Enrollment/Job AttainmentBaseline11 Participants
Video-based Family Therapy: MothersMaternal School Enrollment/Job AttainmentSix month follow-up23 Participants
Standard of Care: MothersMaternal School Enrollment/Job AttainmentBaseline12 Participants
Standard of Care: MothersMaternal School Enrollment/Job AttainmentSix month follow-up13 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026