Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes of High Dose Vitamin D Versus Standard Dose in COVID-19 Egyptian Patients

Clinical Outcomes of High Dose Vitamin D Versus Standard Dose in COVID-19 Egyptian Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04738760
Enrollment
116
Registered
2021-02-04
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2022-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corona Virus Infection, Covid19, Cytokine Storm, Vitamin D Deficiency

Keywords

COVID-19, Cytokine Storm, Vitamin D

Brief summary

Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone which may have beneficial role in reducing COVID-19 adverse outcomes by first regulating the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Recent studies on animal in which acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was induced, showed that vitamin D lead to pulmonary permeability reduction by modulating RAS activity as well as the expression of the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme (ACE2). During COVID-19, downregulation of ACE2 leads to cytokine storm in the host, causing ARDS. In contrast, an experimental study conducted on mice in which ARDS was induced chemically, revealed that vitamin D admiration contributed to mRNA and ACE2 proteins levels improvement, ADRS milder symptoms as well as less lung damage. Additionally, vitamin D had shown antiviral effects on several previous studies, that though to be exerted either by antimicrobial peptides induction which subsequently had direct antiviral action or through immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. In addition, vitamin D stabilizes physical barriers which prevent viruses from reaching tissues susceptible to infection. Finally, previous studies demonstrated that hypovitaminosis D is accompanied by various comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and cancers, all medical conditions that are considered risk factors of COVID-19 infection deterioration and even high mortality rate. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether supplementation with high-dose vitamin D improves the prognosis of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to a standard dose of vitamin D.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Misr International University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 to 65 years. 2. COVID-19 hospitalized patients with pneumonia confirmed by chest X-ray or CT scan. 3. RT-PCR Confirmed infection with COVID-19 or strongly suspected infection with pending confirmation studies. 4. Presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 5. Having either peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 94% ambient air, or a partial oxygen pressure (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio ≤ 300 mmHg.

Exclusion criteria

1. Vitamin D supplementation in the previous month. 2. Contraindication for vitamin D supplementation: active granulomatosis (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, lymphoma), history of calcic lithiasis, known hypervitaminosis D or hypercalcemia, known intolerance to vitamin D. 3. Organ failure requiring admission to a resuscitation or high dependency unit. 4. Pregnant women. 5. Participation in another simultaneous clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of hospitalizationTwo weeksLength of hospital stay
In-hospital mortalityTwo weeksDeath during hospitalization
Clinical status improvement using six category ordinal scaleTwo weeksChange in six category ordinal scale. The categories were defined as follows: 1) patient discharged, 2) hospitalization not requiring supplemental oxygen, 3) hospitalization requiring supplemental low-flow oxygen, 4) hospitalization requiring high-flow supplemental oxygen, 5) hospitalization requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, 6) death.
Change in gas exchangeTwo weeksDifference between ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at baseline, and before discharge
Time to increase in oxygenation48 hoursTime to increase in SpO2/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the baseline SpO2/FiO2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levelsTwo weeksChange in levels of Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) between baseline and before discharge
Need for mechanical ventilator or intensive care unit (ICU) supportTwo weeksAdmission to ICU or usage of mechanical ventilator
Change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levelsTwo weeksChange in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) between baseline and before discharge
Change in serum ferritin levelsTwo weeksChange in levels of serum ferritin between baseline and before discharge
Occurrence of secondary infectionTwo weeksOccurrence of sepsis
Occurrence of at least one severe adverse eventTwo weeksAny serious or severe adverse event that might happens during hospital stay

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026