Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Leflunomide and Azathioprine for the Maintenance Therapy of ANCA Associated Vasculitis

The Efficacy of Leflunomide for the Maintenance Therapy of ANCA Associated Vasculitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04737343
Acronym
LEFAZAREM
Enrollment
114
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2021-06-30
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2021-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ANCA Associated Vasculitis, Maintenance Therapy

Keywords

ANCA Associated Vasculits, Azathioprine, Leflunomide, Maintenance

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, open-labelled, randomized, controlled,multi-center clincial trial. The aim of this study is to verify that the remission rate of patients treated with Leflunomide is not inferior to that of patients treated with Azathioprine.

Detailed description

Background The basic theme of AAV is relapse and remission. The maintenance therapy of AAV aimed to reduce or prevent relapse is very challenge. Although many medications have been used for the maintenance of AAV, Leflunomide (LEF) has not studied thoroughly yet. So far, only one study tested the efficacy of LEF in the maintenance therapy for AAV. However, the sample size of this study is small, so large size clinical study is needed to clarify the role of LEF in the maintenance of AAV. LEF is one of the most frequently prescribed DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatic diseases in China. It is cheap and widely available. Many experiences have been accumulated about its efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with rheumatic diseases. But there is no study to show its effectiveness in the reduction of the relapse of AAV in China. In this study, we try to compare the effectiveness of LEF and AZA, the gold standard for maintenance therapy, in the maintenance of AAV. Objectives To verify that the effectiveness of LEF in reducing relapse is not inferior to AZA by comparing the relapse rate of LEF and AZA during the 18 month maintenance treatment of AAV. Study Design This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, control, non-inferiority study.

Interventions

DRUGLeflunomide

Patient will be treated with Leflunomide(Tuoshu, the commericial name) 30mg QD for 18 months

DRUGAzathioprine Tablets

Patients included into this study will be treated with Azathioprine tablets 100mg QD for 18 months.

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun,China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sichuan Province People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese SLE Treatment And Research Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective, randomized, open-label, control, non-inferiority study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients age 18 to 75 years, both genders can be included. 2. Patients who are newly diagnosed or relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, or EGPA in complete remission after combined treatment with glucocorticoids and pulse cyclophosphamide or Rituximab. Remission is defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score(BVAS version 3) of 0. 3. Patients must fulfill the 1990 ACR classification criteria of GPA, EGPA and 2012 modified Chapel Hill classification criteria of MPA. 4. Patients have to be ANCA-positive at diagnosis or during the course of their disease. 5. Patients must sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with TPMT gene mutation; 2. Patients who had been treated with either AZA or LEF but relapsed in the past; 3. Patients who had been treated with either AZA or LEF but had to stop due to adverse events or intolerance; 4. Patients who have planned for pregnancy in next 2 years; 5. Patients with severe liver dysfunction(defined as the elevation of liver enzyme 3 times the upper limit or Child grade III) or ESRD; 6. Patients with uncontrolled sever hypertension, diabetes, active bacteria or fungal infection; 7. Patients with active hepatitis virus infection as well as patients who have active mycobacteria infection; 8. Patients who are not eligible according to the judge of the principal investigators or site investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the percentage of patients with major relapse in 18 months follow-up timefrom inclusion to the end of the study, 18 months in totalthe percentage of patients with major relapse (re-appearance or worsening of disease with a BVAS \>0 and involvement of at least one major organ, a life-threatening manifestation, or both) at month 18

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of minor relapse of the AZA and LEF treatment group in 18 months.from inclusion to the end of the study, 18 months in totalThe rate of minor relapse (reappearance or worsening of disease with a BVAS \>0, not corresponding to a major relapse but requiring mild treatment intensification) of the AZA and LEF treatment group.
The rate of adverse events and their severity in both LEF and AZA treated patients during 18 months of the study period.from inclusion to the end of the study, 18 months in total2\. The rate of adverse events and their severity(Severe events were defined as the adverse events of grade 3 or 4, deaths caused by any cause, cancers, side effects that necessitate hospitalization) in both LEF and AZA treated patients during the study period.
Patients progress to ESRD at the end of the studyfrom inclusion to the end of the study, 18 months in totalPatients progress to ESRD at the end of the study

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYunjiao Yang, MD
yangyunjiao81@163.com86-13671313079
Backup ContactHanqi Wang, RN
tianxp6@126.com86-15810927696

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026