Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Cunermuspir on Energy, Strength, and Fatigue in Patients With Nerve or Muscle Pain

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Cunermuspir on Energy, Strength, Fatigue and Discomfort in Subjects With Nerve or Muscle Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04737278
Enrollment
56
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2014-01-28
Completion date
2014-09-29
Last updated
2021-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myalgia, Neuralgia

Keywords

Copper, nicotinic acid, energy, strength, fatigue, nerve pain, muscle pain, neuralgia, myalgia

Brief summary

Male and female participants were selected based on chronic neuromuscular pain. Patients were instructed to take two doses of the placebo or cuprous nicotinic acid chelate Cunermusmir twice a day for 28 days. Hypothesis: Cunermuspir would improve quality of life as determined by several questionnaires.

Detailed description

A total of 72 subjects were consented and screened, with 56 subjects (28 males and 28 female) being eligible to participate in the study. Fifty-six subjects with muscle/nerve pain were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to one of two treatment groups. To evaluate primary and secondary objectives, study assessments were conducted at Baseline, and Day 28 ± 2. The Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Questionnaire (INQoL), Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SQIR), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were completed by participants to assess physical function, pain, fatigue/energy and cognitive function.

Interventions

DRUGCunermuspir

Copper Niacin Chelate, 6.06 mg per capsule Non-medicinal ingredients: Organic evaporated cane juice powder, hypromellose, titanium dioxide

OTHERPlacebo

same non-medical ingredients and encapsulation as Intervention 1

Sponsors

Mitosynergy LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The investigational product bottles were labeled according to the requirements of ICH--GCP guidelines and applicable local regulatory guidelines. Investigational products were coded by the unblinded personnel at KGK Synergize who were not involved in the collecting or analyzing of study data. Each package contained a similar label differing only in randomization number.

Intervention model description

randomized, double--blind, placebo controlled, parallel study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female age 18-75 * If female, subject is not of child bearing potential. Defined as females who have * had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy. * bilateral tubal ligation or are post-menopausal (natural or surgically with \> 1 year since last menstruation). * Female subject of childbearing potential must agree to use a medically approved method of birth control and have a negative urine pregnancy test result. Acceptable methods of birth control include: Hormonal contraceptives including oral contraceptives, hormone birth control patch (Ortho Evra), vaginal contraceptive ring (NuvaRing), injectable contraceptives (Depo--Provera, Lunelle), or hormone implant (Norplant System), Intrauterine devices, Vasectomy of partner, Total Abstinence * Subject has unresolved persistent muscle or nerve pain (muscle or nerve pain population) * Subjects using other therapies for nerve/muscle pain (e.g., exercise, TENS, acupuncture, exercise, psychotherapy, massage, physiotherapy, etc), must be used at a stable schedule for 1 month prior to the trial and subject agrees to continue these therapies at the same schedule during the trial avoiding changes in frequency or intensity and to record therapies in the study diary * Agrees to comply with study procedures * Has given voluntary, written, informed consent to participate in * the study

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial * Planned surgery during the course of the trial * Use of prescription drugs for fibromyalgia or nerve pain (e.g.Lyrica, Cymbalta and Savella and others). * Use of prescription medications for depression, anxiety or other mental disorders * Requires the use of prescription drugs to control pain (other than provided rescue medication) * Use of oral or topical prescription or over the counter medications or natural health products for pain relief 3 days prior to randomization and during the trial (other than provided rescue medication) * Use of natural health products including vitamins and minerals within 3 days prior to randomization and during the trial * Use of blood thinning medications (e.g. warfarin) * Chronic lyme disease or chronic parasitic infections * Uncontrolled hypertension defined as untreated systolic blood pressure \> 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \> 100 mmHg * Subjects with diabetes * History of bleeding disorders, or significant blood loss in the past 3 months * Alcohol use \>2 standard alcoholic drinks per day and/or alcohol or drug abuse within the past year * Allergy or sensitivity to study supplement ingredients or acetaminophen * Participation in a clinical research trial within 30 days prior to randomization * Individuals who are cognitively impaired and/or who are unable to give informed consent * Any other condition which in the Investigator's opinion may adversely affect the subject's ability to complete the study or its measures or which may pose significant risk to the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuromuscular Symptomsbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentQuality of life was assessed by using the Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Questionnaire (INQoL) Answers to symptom questions are scored from 0 to 6 or 7 with 0 being none at all and and 6 to 7 being an extreme amount There are three questions regarding pain. The pain score is (a+b+c)/19 x100. The higher the score, the greater the symptom impact.
Platelet ATPbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentPlatelet ATP levels were measured as previously published in the literature.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Ratebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentheart rate is measured in beats per minute
Diastolic Blood Pressurebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentThe diastolic blood pressure was measured in mm Hg
Systolic Blood Pressurebaseline and 28 days after enrollment.Systolic blood pressure was measured in mm Hg
Hemoglobinbaseline and 28 days after enrollment.changes measured in g/L blood
Hematocritbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the fraction of whole blood occupied by red blood cells measured as L/L
WBCbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in white blood cells (WBC) measured in units of 10\^9 per liter blood
RBCbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in red blood cells (RBC) measured in units of 10\^12 per liter blood
MCVbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) measured in units of fL
MCHbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in mean corpuscular hemoglobin, measured in units of pg, the average amount of hemoglobin in a single RBC
MCHCbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentmean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration is the concentration of hemoglobin in a single RBC measured in units of g/L
RDWbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the RBC distribution width (RDW) are reported in units of percentage (%)
Plateletsbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the platelet counts are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood
Neutrophilsbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in neutrophils are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood
Lymphocytebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in lymphocytes are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood
Monocytebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in monocytes are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood
Household Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptomsbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentPhysical function in performing household chores was assessed using the Revised Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SQIR) For each household chore participants are asked to check 1 of 11 boxes between no difficulty and extremely difficult No difficulty is scored as 0 and extreme difficulty with the task is scored as 10. The higher the score, the more difficulty experienced performing the chore. Friend & Bennett Arthritis Res & Therapy 2011. Household chores are just one module with 9 questions for a maximum of 90 points. These scores are summed and divided by 3. Module 2 relates to the emotional impact with only two questions for a total of 20 points. Module 3 relates to physical symptoms with a total of ten questions worth a maximum of 100 points. This score is divided by 2. The three modules are summed for a total impact score of 100 points. A score of 0 indicates absolutely no impact and a score of 100 the greatest possible impact.
Basophilbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in basophils are reported in units of 10\^9 cells per liter blood
NLRbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentChanges in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are reported as a dimensionless fraction of 1
Glucosebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in blood glucose are reported in units of mmol per liter
Ureabaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in renal function as measured by blood urea are reported in units of mmol per liter
Creatininebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in creatinine are reported in units of micromol per liter
eGFRbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are reported in units of mL/min/1.73m\^2
Sodiumbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in plasma sodium are reported in units of mmol per liter, reference range is 133-146 mEq/L, same as mM/L bloodbook.com
Potassiumbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in plasma potassium are reported in units of mmol per liter, reference value 3.5-5.4 mmol per liter, bloodbook.com
Chloridebaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in plasma chloride are reported in uits of mmol per liter The reference range is 98-106 mmol per liter, bloodbook.com
Bilirubinbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in total bilirubin are reported in units of micro moles per liter. Direct: up to 0.4 mg/dL, Total: up to 1.0 mg/dL bloodbook.com, Converts to 6.84-17.1 micro moles per liter. https://unitslab.com/node/37
ALTbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the blood are reported as units per liter Reference range 1 - 21 units/L bloodbook.com
ASTbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the liver enzyme aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the blood are reported as units per liter Reference range 7 - 27 units/L bloodbook.com
GGTbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in the liver enzyme gamma-glutamyl transferase in the blood are reported as units per liter
Copperbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in copper concentration in the blood are reported in units of micro moles per liter
Eosinophilbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentchanges in eosinophils are reported in units of 10\^9 cells per liter blood
Cognitionbaseline and 28 days after enrollmentCognition is the mental process of knowing, including aspects such as awareness, perception, reasoning, and judgment. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE) puts a number to cognition. Any score of 24 or more out of a total 30 points is considered normal cognition. A test taker may be asked to orientate in space and time by recalling aspects of the physical location as well as month, day, year, and perhaps season. Simple mathematical calculations like counting backwards from 100 by seven may also be included. A complex command such as redrawing geometric figures scores six points in this exam. Since none of the participates were cognitively impaired, the investigators decided to make obtaining a perfect score on this exam an outcome measure.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 56 met the enrollment requirements. Of these only 49 completed the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cunermuspir
Cunermuspir (Copper Niacin Chelate) 6.06mg per capsule. Non--medicinal ingredients: Organic evaporated cane juice powder, hypromellose, titanium dioxide Two doses per day: one with the morning meal and the other with a mid afternoon snack. The study duration was 28 days. Cunermuspir: Copper Niacin Chelate, 6.06 mg per capsule Non-medicinal ingredients: Organic evaporated cane juice powder, hypromellose, titanium dioxide
28
Placebo
Organic evaporated cane juice powder, hypromellose, titanium dioxide. Same dosing as Cunermuspir arm Placebo: same non-medical ingredients and encapsulation as Intervention 1
28
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyfailure to complete questionnaire11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboCunermuspirTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants27 Participants55 Participants
Age, Continuous48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Region of Enrollment
Canada
28 participants28 participants56 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 267 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Neuromuscular Symptoms

Quality of life was assessed by using the Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Questionnaire (INQoL) Answers to symptom questions are scored from 0 to 6 or 7 with 0 being none at all and and 6 to 7 being an extreme amount There are three questions regarding pain. The pain score is (a+b+c)/19 x100. The higher the score, the greater the symptom impact.

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three patients were lost to followup.Four other patients had testing issues that the study investigators deemed them to be removed from baseline and day 28 analyses. This is why there are not 28 patients represented in baseline whereas there are in toxicology related outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirNeuromuscular Symptomsbaseline36.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 16.4
CunermuspirNeuromuscular SymptomsDay 2828.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 18.6
PlaceboNeuromuscular Symptomsbaseline43.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 21.1
PlaceboNeuromuscular SymptomsDay 2832.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 23
p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: test of the hypothesis that the score on day 28 is different than the baseline scorep-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Platelet ATP

Platelet ATP levels were measured as previously published in the literature.

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: ATP isolated from platelets. Some samples were not used for analysis due to contamination with red blood cells.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirPlatelet ATPbaseline43.6 nmol / E9 PlateletsStandard Deviation 16.4
CunermuspirPlatelet ATPday 2859.2 nmol / E9 PlateletsStandard Deviation 20.1
PlaceboPlatelet ATPbaseline42 nmol / E9 PlateletsStandard Deviation 13.1
PlaceboPlatelet ATPday 2851.2 nmol / E9 PlateletsStandard Deviation 15
Comparison: Day 28. Between group comparison was made using ANCOVA accounting for baseline values, no significance at p\<0.05. Within group comparisons were made using the paired Student's t test.p-value: 0.15t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

ALT

changes in the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the blood are reported as units per liter Reference range 1 - 21 units/L bloodbook.com

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirALTbaseline27.6 U/LStandard Error 12.8
CunermuspirALTday 2828.2 U/LStandard Error 15.5
PlaceboALTbaseline28.5 U/LStandard Error 16.3
PlaceboALTday 2828.4 U/LStandard Error 15.4
p-value: 0.95Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison between baseline and day 28 values in Cunermuspir groupp-value: 0.4Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison between baseline and day 28 values for the Placebo Armp-value: 0.8Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

AST

changes in the liver enzyme aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the blood are reported as units per liter Reference range 7 - 27 units/L bloodbook.com

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirASTbaseline23.0 U/LStandard Error 4.9
CunermuspirASTday 2824.2 U/LStandard Error 6.2
PlaceboASTbaseline23.1 U/LStandard Error 6.3
PlaceboASTday 2825.8 U/LStandard Error 9.5
Comparison: comparison of AST enzyme activity in blood on day 28 between Cunermuspir and Placebop-value: 0.62Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: baseline to day 28 comparisonp-value: 0.24Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: baseline to day 28 comparison of AST activity in Placebo groupp-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Basophil

changes in basophils are reported in units of 10\^9 cells per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirBasophilbaseline0.0107 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.0315
CunermuspirBasophilday 280.0077 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.0272
PlaceboBasophilbaseline0.0071 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.0262
PlaceboBasophilday 280.0074 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.0267
Comparison: The day 28 basophil counts on day 28 were compared between the two arms of this study.p-value: 0.98Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Bilirubin

changes in total bilirubin are reported in units of micro moles per liter. Direct: up to 0.4 mg/dL, Total: up to 1.0 mg/dL bloodbook.com, Converts to 6.84-17.1 micro moles per liter. https://unitslab.com/node/37

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirBilirubinbaseline11.0 micromol/LStandard Error 5.9
CunermuspirBilirubinday 2811.2 micromol/LStandard Error 5.9
PlaceboBilirubinbaseline9.3 micromol/LStandard Error 3.5
PlaceboBilirubinday 289.9 micromol/LStandard Error 4.3
Comparison: Bilirubin concentrations between Placebo and Cunermuspir compared at day 28p-value: 0.36Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison of bilirubin concentrations between baseline and day 28 in the Cunermuspir Armp-value: 0.72Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: bilirubin concentrations compared between baseline and Day 28 in the Placebo Armp-value: 0.35Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Chloride

changes in plasma chloride are reported in uits of mmol per liter The reference range is 98-106 mmol per liter, bloodbook.com

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Enrollment pre-screening values are taken as the baseline. The study sponsor was of the opinion that these participants started the study dehydrated. Of the original 56 three were lost to followup or withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirChloridebaseline106.14 mmol/LStandard Error 2.12
CunermuspirChlorideday 28105.08 mmol/LStandard Error 2.23
PlaceboChloridebaseline106.43 mmol/LStandard Error 2.27
PlaceboChlorideday 28105.15 mmol/LStandard Error 1.99
p-value: 0.87ANCOVA
Comparison: comparison between baseline and day 28 chloride concentrations in the Cunermuspir groupp-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: comparison of blood chloride concentrations between baseline and day 28 in Placebo Arm participantsp-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cognition

Cognition is the mental process of knowing, including aspects such as awareness, perception, reasoning, and judgment. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE) puts a number to cognition. Any score of 24 or more out of a total 30 points is considered normal cognition. A test taker may be asked to orientate in space and time by recalling aspects of the physical location as well as month, day, year, and perhaps season. Simple mathematical calculations like counting backwards from 100 by seven may also be included. A complex command such as redrawing geometric figures scores six points in this exam. Since none of the participates were cognitively impaired, the investigators decided to make obtaining a perfect score on this exam an outcome measure.

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three patients were lost to followup.Four other patients had testing issues that the study investigators deemed them to be removed from baseline and day 28 analyses. This is why there are not 28 patients represented in baseline whereas there are in toxicology related outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CunermuspirCognitionbaseline18 participants with perfect score
CunermuspirCognitionday 2822 participants with perfect score
PlaceboCognitionbaseline16 participants with perfect score
PlaceboCognitionday 2818 participants with perfect score
Comparison: base line between group comparisonsp-value: 0.54Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.14Fisher Exact
Secondary

Copper

changes in copper concentration in the blood are reported in units of micro moles per liter

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Of the 56 enrolled in the study three were lost to followup or dropped out.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirCopperbaseline16.18 U/LStandard Error 2.42
CunermuspirCopperday 2816.6 U/LStandard Error 2.8
PlaceboCopperbaseline17.62 U/LStandard Error 2.51
PlaceboCopperday 2817.57 U/LStandard Error 2.89
Comparison: Between group comparisons were made using ANCOVAp-value: 0.03ANCOVA
Comparison: comparison of baseline with day 28p-value: 0.1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: comparison between baseline and day 28 serum copper concentrations in the Placebo Armp-value: 0.89t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Creatinine

changes in creatinine are reported in units of micromol per liter

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirCreatininebaseline72.2 micromol/LStandard Error 11.6
CunermuspirCreatinineday 2872.3 micromol/LStandard Error 13.7
PlaceboCreatininebaseline72.9 micromol/LStandard Error 16
PlaceboCreatinineday 2873.7 micromol/LStandard Error 15
p-value: 0.38ANCOVA
Secondary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

The diastolic blood pressure was measured in mm Hg

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirDiastolic Blood Pressurebaseline70.5 mm HgStandard Error 6.4
CunermuspirDiastolic Blood Pressureday 2869.3 mm HgStandard Error 7.3
PlaceboDiastolic Blood Pressurebaseline75.0 mm HgStandard Error 9.4
PlaceboDiastolic Blood Pressureday 2874.6 mm HgStandard Error 7.3
Comparison: The original report from KGK Synergize/Science did not specify if the results are ANCOVA or a between group comparison at 2ay 28p-value: <0.01ANCOVA
Secondary

eGFR

changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are reported in units of mL/min/1.73m\^2

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspireGFRbaseline90.4 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Error 17.3
CunermuspireGFRday 2891.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Error 18.3
PlaceboeGFRbaseline88.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Error 16.2
PlaceboeGFRday 2885.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Error 15.7
p-value: 0.01ANCOVA
Secondary

Eosinophil

changes in eosinophils are reported in units of 10\^9 cells per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirEosinophilbaseline0.154 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.074
CunermuspirEosinophilday 280.181 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboEosinophilbaseline0.143 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.063
PlaceboEosinophilday 280.130 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.072
Comparison: comparison of eosinophil counts at day 28p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

GGT

changes in the liver enzyme gamma-glutamyl transferase in the blood are reported as units per liter

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirGGTbaseline20.9 U/LStandard Error 13.6
CunermuspirGGTday 2824.0 U/LStandard Error 18.1
PlaceboGGTbaseline28.6 U/LStandard Error 36.6
PlaceboGGTday 2825.6 U/LStandard Error 23
Comparison: comparison between placebo and Cunermuspir at day 28p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison of GGT activities in participants' blood at baseline and on day 28p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon Signed Rank
Comparison: Comparison of GGT activity in blood between Placebo Arm participants at baseline and on day 28p-value: 0.97Wilcoxon Signed-Rank
Secondary

Glucose

changes in blood glucose are reported in units of mmol per liter

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: In this population the initial screening was considered the baseline for all blood chemistry parameters. Three of the the participants were lost to followup or withdrew from the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirGlucosebaseline5.12 mmol/LStandard Error 0.55
CunermuspirGlucoseday 285.25 mmol/LStandard Error 0.44
PlaceboGlucosebaseline5.30 mmol/LStandard Error 0.42
PlaceboGlucoseday 285.24 mmol/LStandard Error 0.48
Comparison: Comparison of blood glucose in the Cunermuspir arm between enrollment baseline and day 28.p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of enrollment baseline blood glucose and day 28 in the placebo armp-value: 0.04t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.92ANCOVA
Secondary

Heart Rate

heart rate is measured in beats per minute

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirHeart Ratebaseline70.3 beats per minuteStandard Error 10.8
CunermuspirHeart Rateday 2868.3 beats per minuteStandard Error 9.7
PlaceboHeart Ratebaseline68.2 beats per minuteStandard Error 8.1
PlaceboHeart Rateday 2869.7 beats per minuteStandard Error 9.4
p-value: 0.54ANCOVA
Secondary

Hematocrit

changes in the fraction of whole blood occupied by red blood cells measured as L/L

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirHematocritbaseline0.411 L/LStandard Error 0.034
CunermuspirHematocritday 280.416 L/LStandard Error 0.038
PlaceboHematocritbaseline0.416 L/LStandard Error 0.032
PlaceboHematocritday 280.415 L/LStandard Error 0.031
p-value: 0.84ANCOVA
Secondary

Hemoglobin

changes measured in g/L blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment.

Population: For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirHemoglobinbaseline140.3 g/LStandard Error 12.9
CunermuspirHemoglobinday 28142.2 g/LStandard Error 14.3
PlaceboHemoglobinbaseline141.3 g/LStandard Error 12.4
PlaceboHemoglobinday 28141.0 g/LStandard Error 12
p-value: 0.48ANCOVA
Secondary

Household Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptoms

Physical function in performing household chores was assessed using the Revised Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SQIR) For each household chore participants are asked to check 1 of 11 boxes between no difficulty and extremely difficult No difficulty is scored as 0 and extreme difficulty with the task is scored as 10. The higher the score, the more difficulty experienced performing the chore. Friend & Bennett Arthritis Res & Therapy 2011. Household chores are just one module with 9 questions for a maximum of 90 points. These scores are summed and divided by 3. Module 2 relates to the emotional impact with only two questions for a total of 20 points. Module 3 relates to physical symptoms with a total of ten questions worth a maximum of 100 points. This score is divided by 2. The three modules are summed for a total impact score of 100 points. A score of 0 indicates absolutely no impact and a score of 100 the greatest possible impact.

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three patients were lost to followup.Four other patients had testing issues that the study investigators deemed them to be removed from baseline and day 28 analyses. This is why there are not 28 patients represented in baseline whereas there are in toxicology related outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirHousehold Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptomsbaseline27.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 16.8
CunermuspirHousehold Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptomsday 2816.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.9
PlaceboHousehold Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptomsbaseline34.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 16.9
PlaceboHousehold Chores and Neuro Muscular Sumptomsday 2829.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 28.7
p-value: <0.01ANCOVA
Comparison: comparison made between placebo and Cunermuspir at baselinep-value: 0.03Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison made at day 28p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison between baseline and day 28p-value: 0.07t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Lymphocyte

changes in lymphocytes are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirLymphocytebaseline2.01 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.64
CunermuspirLymphocyteday 282.04 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboLymphocytebaseline1.83 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboLymphocyteday 281.74 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.51
p-value: <0.01ANCOVA
Secondary

MCH

changes in mean corpuscular hemoglobin, measured in units of pg, the average amount of hemoglobin in a single RBC

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirMCHbaseline29.5 pg per cellStandard Error 1.64
CunermuspirMCHday 2829.48 pg per cellStandard Error 1.69
PlaceboMCHbaseline29.81 pg per cellStandard Error 1.36
PlaceboMCHday 2829.86 pg per cellStandard Error 1.29
p-value: <0.01ANCOVA
Secondary

MCHC

mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration is the concentration of hemoglobin in a single RBC measured in units of g/L

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirMCHCbaseline342.4 g/LStandard Error 8.2
CunermuspirMCHCday 28341.2 g/LStandard Error 6.4
PlaceboMCHCbaseline339.9 g/LStandard Error 7.8
PlaceboMCHCday 28340.5 g/LStandard Error 5.7
p-value: 0.48ANCOVA
Secondary

MCV

changes in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) measured in units of fL

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three patients were lost to followup.Four other patients had testing issues that the study investigators deemed them to be removed from baseline and day 28 analyses. This is why there are not 28 patients represented in baseline whereas there are in toxicology related outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirMCVbaseline86.2 fempto liter per cellStandard Error 3.9
CunermuspirMCVday 2886.4 fempto liter per cellStandard Error 4.3
PlaceboMCVbaseline87.7 fempto liter per cellStandard Error 3.1
PlaceboMCVday 2887.7 fempto liter per cellStandard Error 3.1
p-value: <0.01ANCOVA
Secondary

Monocyte

changes in monocytes are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirMonocytebaseline0.450 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.137
CunermuspirMonocyteday 280.473 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.176
PlaceboMonocytebaseline0.475 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboMonocyteday 280.500 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 0.124
Comparison: comparison of baseline valuesp-value: 0.47Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: comparison performed on data from day 28p-value: 0.24Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Neutrophils

changes in neutrophils are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirNeutrophilsbaseline3.28 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.06
CunermuspirNeutrophilsday 283.15 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.19
PlaceboNeutrophilsbaseline3.35 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.13
PlaceboNeutrophilsday 283.60 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.13
p-value: 0.03ANCOVA
Comparison: comparison of neutrophils from baseline to day 28p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

NLR

Changes in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are reported as a dimensionless fraction of 1

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirNLRbaseline1.77 dimensionaless unitsStandard Error 0.15
CunermuspirNLRday 281.67 dimensionaless unitsStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboNLRbaseline1.90 dimensionaless unitsStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboNLRday 282.24 dimensionaless unitsStandard Error 0.19
Comparison: All other statistical analyses were performed by KGK Synergize. This site was used to determine that the NLR were normally distributed https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/normality-test-calculator.php~Because these data fulfilled the assumptions of ANOVA, the data were analyzed using this site:~http://vassarstats.net/anova2u.htmlp-value: 0.025ANOVA
Secondary

Platelets

changes in the platelet counts are reported in units of 10\^9 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: By day 28 three participants were lost to followup: two in the Cunermuspir group and one in the placebo group. There were issues in handling of one platelet sample in the Cunermuspir group. This brings the number in the Cunermuspir group down to 25 on day 28. For technical reasons, platelet data are missing for subject 021. All other blood cell data are present in this report of data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirPlateletsbaseline250 10^9 platelets/LStandard Error 62
CunermuspirPlateletsday 28255 10^9 platelets/LStandard Error 65
PlaceboPlateletsbaseline266 10^9 platelets/LStandard Error 71
PlaceboPlateletsday 28269 10^9 platelets/LStandard Error 69
p-value: 0.02ANCOVA
Secondary

Potassium

changes in plasma potassium are reported in units of mmol per liter, reference value 3.5-5.4 mmol per liter, bloodbook.com

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: The study sponsor is of the opinion that these participants were dehydrated when they started the study. They were instructed to drink more water. Three of the 56 that started the study were lost to followup or withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirPotassiumbaseline4.86 mmol/LStandard Error 0.45
CunermuspirPotassiumday 284.44 mmol/LStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboPotassiumbaseline4.84 mmol/LStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboPotassiumday 284.39 mmol/LStandard Error 0.39
p-value: 0.58ANCOVA
Comparison: comparison of blood potassium concentration upon enrollment and day 28 in the Cunermuspir participantsp-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: comparison of blood potassium concentrations from enrollment to day 28 in participants in the Placebo arm.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

RBC

changes in red blood cells (RBC) measured in units of 10\^12 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirRBCbaseline4.76 10^12 cells/LStandard Error 0.38
CunermuspirRBCday 284.82 10^12 cells/LStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboRBCbaseline4.74 10^12 cells/LStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboRBCday 284.73 10^12 cells/LStandard Error 0.38
p-value: 0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

RDW

changes in the RBC distribution width (RDW) are reported in units of percentage (%)

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirRDWbaseline13.78 red cell distribution width %Standard Error 0.7
CunermuspirRDWday 2813.77 red cell distribution width %Standard Error 0.63
PlaceboRDWbaseline13.80 red cell distribution width %Standard Error 0.5
PlaceboRDWday 2813.93 red cell distribution width %Standard Error 0.58
p-value: 0.06ANCOVA
Secondary

Sodium

changes in plasma sodium are reported in units of mmol per liter, reference range is 133-146 mEq/L, same as mM/L bloodbook.com

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirSodiumbaseline143.39 mmol/LStandard Error 2.25
CunermuspirSodiumday 28142.62 mmol/LStandard Error 2.47
PlaceboSodiumbaseline143.14 mmol/LStandard Error 2.16
PlaceboSodiumday 28141.89 mmol/LStandard Error 2.12
p-value: 0.23ANCOVA
p-value: 0.18t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Blood sodium concentration between baseline and day 28 in the Placebo group.p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure was measured in mm Hg

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment.

Population: For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirSystolic Blood Pressurebaseline111.7 mm HgStandard Error 10.6
CunermuspirSystolic Blood Pressureday 28109.5 mm HgStandard Error 15.8
PlaceboSystolic Blood Pressurebaseline114.6 mm HgStandard Error 13.1
PlaceboSystolic Blood Pressureday 28112.3 mm HgStandard Error 11.2
p-value: 0.31ANCOVA
Secondary

Urea

changes in renal function as measured by blood urea are reported in units of mmol per liter

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirUreabaseline5.16 mmol/LStandard Error 1.13
CunermuspirUreaday 285.05 mmol/LStandard Error 1.57
PlaceboUreabaseline5.33 mmol/LStandard Error 1.25
PlaceboUreaday 285.26 mmol/LStandard Error 1.08
p-value: 0.51ANCOVA
Secondary

WBC

changes in white blood cells (WBC) measured in units of 10\^9 per liter blood

Time frame: baseline and 28 days after enrollment

Population: Three participants were lost to followup on day 28. For toxicology outcome measures the investigators included all 28 participants in each group at baseline as well as data for the 26 (Cunermuspir) and 27 (Placebo) remaining at day 28. The investigators considered these data valid in spite of issues with the questionnaires of other outcome measures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CunermuspirWBCday 285.88 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.81
CunermuspirWBCbaseline5.93 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.57
PlaceboWBCday 286.00 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.34
PlaceboWBCbaseline5.82 10^9 cells/LStandard Error 1.5
p-value: 0.63ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026