Skip to content

Effectiveness of Extended Reality CPR Training Methods

Comparison of Extended Reality and Conventional Methods of Basic Life Support Training: Protocol for a Multinational Pragmatic Clinical Trial (XR BLS Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04736888
Enrollment
154
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2021-09-10
Completion date
2024-09-09
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Cardiac Life Support, Virtual Reality

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Basic Cardiac Life Support, Virtual Reality, Extended Reality, Education

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of the extended reality (XR)-based basic life support (BLS) training.

Detailed description

Conventional CPR training is based on the use of a manikin and a training video. Though several feedback devices have been developed to improve the effectiveness of the training, they were neither realistic nor immersive. In addition, in conventional training programs, trainees are constrained in terms of time and location, as they are usually kept to a schedule. Virtual reality (VR) technology, which was designed to maximize immersion, could be used to overcome those limitations, which in turn may improve the effectiveness of CPR training. However, even with VR technology, procedures such as chest compressions, ventilation, and defibrillation cannot be implemented as in the real world. Extended reality (XR), which combines the virtual and real worlds, could overcome these limitations by facilitating the use of real-world manikins in the virtual environment.

Interventions

OTHERextended-reality CPR training

extended-reality technologies based CPR training module

conventional CPR training with video

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals who are not healthcare providers and are 18 years old or older

Exclusion criteria

Participants who * are not capable of performing either the training or the CPR test due to physical or cognitive limitations * have upper extremity injuries * are pregnant * experience dizziness, headache, or motion sickness during the 2-minute XR device adaptation period that prevents them from participating in the simulation study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mean compression depth, mmTest sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingcompression depth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the total number of chest compressions (n)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingThe total number of chest compressions
correct hand position (n, percent)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingThe American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines describe the correct hand position for chest compression as the lower half of the victim's sternum in the centre of the chest, between the nipples.
adequate compression depth (n, percent)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingcompression depth between 5cm and 6cm
compression and full release (n, percent)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingfull release after chest compression
mean compression rate (number per minute)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingmean compression rate
adequate compression rate (percent)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingcompression rate between 100 and 120 per minute
the mean chest compression depth(mm)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingcompression depth between 5cm and 6cm
hands-off time (sec)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingInterruptions of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
The time interval from arrival on the scene to the first chest compression (sec)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingThe time interval from arrival on the scene to the first chest compression.
AED useTest sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingDone/Not done
Correct AED useTest sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingYes/No
Time from powering on the AED to defibrillation (sec)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingTime from powering on the AED to defibrillation (sec)
Time from checking for a response to defibrillation (sec)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingTime from checking for a response to defibrillation (sec)
adequate compression depth and rate (percent)Test sessions on day 1 (during 5 minutes) after 1 hour trainingadequate compression death and rate, simultaneously

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026