Skip to content

Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04736472
Acronym
IMPACT-GI
Enrollment
552
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2021-03-26
Completion date
2024-10-09
Last updated
2025-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Keywords

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, Irinotecan, Fluoropyrimidines, Topoisomerase I inhibitors, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastics, Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action

Brief summary

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the study of how genes affect a person's response to drugs. PGx testing for certain genes can help predict the risk of side effects from chemotherapy agents. Testing is not regularly performed in clinical practice due to long wait times for results and challenges with integrating test results in the electronic health record. Investigators leading this study hope to find out if providing cancer care providers with the ability to order a PGx test and electronically receive results with dosing recommendations will increase the use of these tests to guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. This is a non-randomized implementation study, which means that all participants in this study will undergo genotyping for a pharmacogenetic test. The investigators will primarily measure the feasibility of using this test to guide cancer care.

Interventions

Patients with reduced function alleles (DPYD intermediate or poor metabolizer and/or UGT1A1 poor metabolizer) will be recommended to receive dose reductions per clinical pharmacogenetic guidelines. Patients that do not carry actionable alleles (DPYD normal metabolizer and/or UGT1A1 normal or intermediate metabolizer) will receive standard dosing.

Sponsors

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a nonrandomized, open-label study to investigate the feasibility of establishing and integrating a pharmacogenetic test into clinical oncology care. A historical control group of patients with gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in a biobank will be used to compare toxicity outcomes of the prospectively-genotyped patients.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able and willing to provide informed consent 2. Male or female, aged 18 years or older at the time of study initiation 3. Pathologically confirmed gastrointestinal malignancy for which treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan is indicated 4. Willing to undergo blood or saliva sampling for PGx testing and comply with all study-related procedures 5. Life expectancy of at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior treatment with irinotecan 2. DPYD or UGT1A1 genotype already known 3. Severe renal or hepatic impairment (or unacceptable laboratory values), including: * Neutrophil count of \<1.5 x 109/L, platelet count of \<100 x 109/L * Hepatic function as defined by serum bilirubin \>1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>2.5 x ULN, or in case of liver metastases ALT and AST\>5 x ULN * Renal function as defined by serum creatinine \>1.5 x ULN, or creatinine clearance \<60 ml/min (by Cockcroft-Gault Equation) 4. Women who are pregnant or breast feeding, or subjects who refuse to use reliable contraceptive methods throughout the study 5. Treating physician does not want subject to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had Their Pharmacogenetic Tests Returned Prior to Initial Dose14 daysThe Number and percentage of participants who had their pharmacogenetic tests returned prior to the first determined dose of chemotherapy.
Fidelity: Level of Agreement With Dose Recommendations14 daysThe number and percentage of participants with dose modifications made in agreement with the genotype-guided dosing recommendations for the first dose of chemotherapy.
Penetrance: Proportion of Pharmacogenetic Tests Ordered by Providers14 daysThe number and percentage of participants with pharmacogenetic tests ordered compared to the number of patients eligible for testing at participating sites during the study timeframe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severe Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)6 monthsPercentage of patients experiencing a severe TRAE (an event requiring hospitalization, emergency room visits, or oncology evaluation center). Severe TRAEs were one of the outcomes measured by the study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 552 enrolled participants, 531 were eligible to begin study procedures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prospective Cohort
Enrollees were given DPYD and UGT1A1 testing before starting chemotherapy
276
Confirmatory Cohort
Enrollees were given DPYD and UGT1A1 testing after starting chemotherapy at physician's request
20
BioBank Cohort
Enrollees with biobank samples were tested for DPYD and UGT1A1 variants, and retrospectively chart reviewed for outcomes
235
Total531

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4806
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProspective CohortConfirmatory CohortBioBank CohortTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
114 Participants9 Participants86 Participants209 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
162 Participants11 Participants149 Participants322 Participants
ECOG at Enrollment
0
151 Participants12 Participants102 Participants265 Participants
ECOG at Enrollment
1
89 Participants6 Participants109 Participants204 Participants
ECOG at Enrollment
2
20 Participants1 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
ECOG at Enrollment
3
8 Participants1 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
ECOG at Enrollment
NA
8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants0 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
265 Participants19 Participants0 Participants284 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants234 Participants237 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants0 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
50 Participants0 Participants38 Participants88 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants1 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
205 Participants19 Participants189 Participants413 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
276 participants20 participants235 participants531 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
125 Participants12 Participants114 Participants251 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants8 Participants121 Participants280 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
35 / 2253 / 2047 / 229
other
Total, other adverse events
214 / 22520 / 20140 / 229
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 22510 / 2076 / 229

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had Their Pharmacogenetic Tests Returned Prior to Initial Dose

The Number and percentage of participants who had their pharmacogenetic tests returned prior to the first determined dose of chemotherapy.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: Number and percentage of participants with both PGx test results and who began a qualifying chemotherapy. The BioBank Cohort and Confirmatory Cohort are not included in this measure as their PGx testing was intentionally ordered after their first dose of chemotherapy, therefore how many results were returned prior to first dose was not applicable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective CohortFeasibility: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had Their Pharmacogenetic Tests Returned Prior to Initial DosePGx Result Returned before Chemotherapy130 Participants
Prospective CohortFeasibility: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had Their Pharmacogenetic Tests Returned Prior to Initial DosePGx Result Returned After Chemotherapy95 Participants
Primary

Fidelity: Level of Agreement With Dose Recommendations

The number and percentage of participants with dose modifications made in agreement with the genotype-guided dosing recommendations for the first dose of chemotherapy.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: Number and percentage of participants with an actionable genetic variant also receiving an interacting chemotherapy (DPYD Poor and Intermediate Metabolizers receiving fluoropyrimidine and UGT1A1 Poor Metabolizers receiving irinotecan). The BioBank Cohort and Confirmatory Cohort are not included in this measure as their PGx testing was intentionally ordered after their first dose of chemotherapy, therefore modifying their chemotherapy to match PGx results was not applicable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective CohortFidelity: Level of Agreement With Dose RecommendationsNumber and percent of participants with PGx test results returned before chemotherapy initiation11 Participants
Prospective CohortFidelity: Level of Agreement With Dose RecommendationsNumber and percent of participants with DPYD dose mods in agreement to genotype-recommendations6 Participants
Prospective CohortFidelity: Level of Agreement With Dose RecommendationsNumber and percent of participants with UGT1A1 dose mods in agreement to genotype-recommendations5 Participants
Primary

Penetrance: Proportion of Pharmacogenetic Tests Ordered by Providers

The number and percentage of participants with pharmacogenetic tests ordered compared to the number of patients eligible for testing at participating sites during the study timeframe

Time frame: 14 days

Population: In order to calculate the penetrance of the intervention, as this was an implementation trial, it is necessary to consider the total number of patients who would have been eligible for recruitment. This includes both the prospective arms, as well as individuals in participating clinics during the study timeframe who were not approached for consent due to personnel and screening limitations.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective CohortPenetrance: Proportion of Pharmacogenetic Tests Ordered by Providers288 Participants
Secondary

Severe Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)

Percentage of patients experiencing a severe TRAE (an event requiring hospitalization, emergency room visits, or oncology evaluation center). Severe TRAEs were one of the outcomes measured by the study.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Prospective and BioBank Cohorts are broken out into DGI and Non-DGI groups to compare participant outcomes by genotype.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Prospective CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Severe TRAEs6 Participants
Prospective CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Discontinuation5 Participants
Prospective CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Modifications6 Participants
Prospective Cohort, Non-DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Modifications107 Participants
Prospective Cohort, Non-DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Severe TRAEs63 Participants
Prospective Cohort, Non-DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Discontinuation49 Participants
BioBank Cohort, DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Modifications13 Participants
BioBank Cohort, DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Severe TRAEs10 Participants
BioBank Cohort, DGI GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Discontinuation8 Participants
BioBank Cohort, Normal Metabolizers GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Severe TRAEs66 Participants
BioBank Cohort, Normal Metabolizers GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Discontinuation60 Participants
BioBank Cohort, Normal Metabolizers GroupSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Modifications108 Participants
Confirmatory CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Modifications12 Participants
Confirmatory CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Severe TRAEs10 Participants
Confirmatory CohortSevere Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE)Treatment Discontinuation8 Participants
Comparison: Severe TRAEsp-value: 0.224Fisher Exact
Comparison: Severe TRAEsp-value: 0.025Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026