Skip to content

Which Physical Therapy Program is Cost-effective in Knee Osteoarthritis?

The Cost-effectiveness of Inpatient and Outpatient Physical Therapy Programs in Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04736069
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
2011-03-01
Completion date
2013-01-30
Last updated
2021-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

cost-effectiveness, knee, osteoarthritis, physical therapy

Brief summary

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease with significant levels of socioeconomic burden to the society. P The non-pharmacologic interventions in knee OA include weight loss, exercise, and physical therapy. In this study, we aimed to to compare the cost-effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient physical therapy programs in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major problem for society with a heavy economic burden. Especially in the elderly population, integrated rehabilitation programs are frequently used to improve patients' symptoms and quality of life. To estimate the costs and utility of the rehabilitation programs may help clinicians decide optimal treatment strategy with proper usage of resources. Therefore, we aimed to to compare the cost-effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient physical therapy programs in patients with knee osteoarthritis.The study included 52 patients with the diagnose of knee osteoarthritis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=30) received 21 sessions of inpatient physical therapy program including electrotherapy, superficial- deep heat applications and basic knee exercise program. Group 2 (n=22) received the same physical therapy program at outpatient clinic.

Interventions

OTHERPhysical therapy program

In the physical therapy program, 20 minutes of hot pack, 20 minutes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS; 30 to 40 Hz), 6 minutes of ultrasound (US; 1 MHz, 1 to 1.5 Watt/cm2) therapy were applied to both groups. Both of the programs were supervised by physical therapists. A combined range of motion and strengthening exercises were given to both groups to be performed two times a day.

Sponsors

Ufuk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Group 1 received 21 sessions of inpatient physical therapy program including electrotherapy, superficial- deep heat applications and basic knee exercise program. Group 2 received the same physical therapy program at outpatient clinic.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Knee OA diagnosed patients based on American College of Rheumatology Criteria

Exclusion criteria

* visual disturbances * malignancy * inflammatory rheumatic diseases * pregnancy * advanced cardiovascular, kidney or liver pathologies * uncontrolled hypertension * patients who had injuries in their lower extremities * patients who underwent under total hip or knee prosthetic surgeries.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain; Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from Baseline VAS scores at 6 monthsPatients were requested to sign their pain level on a 10 cm horizontal line with terminal ends of 'no pain' and 'the worst pain'
Physical Function; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) IndexChange from Baseline WOMAC scores at 6 monthsWOMAC questionnaire includes five items for pain, two for stiffness, and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). All the items are scored on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores indicating a higher level of symptoms or physical disability.
Fall Risk Assessment; Hendrich II Fall Risk ScaleChange from Baseline Hendrich II Fall Risk Scale at 6 monthsThe scale includes seven items. These items are confusion & disorientation, depression, change in excretion, dizziness, gender, antiepileptic & benzodiazepine use, and get up and walk test. The final score is the sum of these scores; (the score range is between 0-16; 16 is the highest possible score) Patients five or more scores on the scale are considered to be at high risk.
Quality of Life; Short-Form 36-General HealthChange from Baseline Short-Form 36 scores at 6 monthsShort-Form 36 (SF-36) which is composed of eight multi-item scales as bodily pain, physical functioning, social functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, vitality, general health, mental health. Each score of these scales ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicating higher QoL.
Median Total Cost Per Participant for Health Carebaseline-six monthsmedian total expenses for health care at the end of the study

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Inpatient Physical Therapy
Group 1 received 21 physical therapy sessions, including electrotherapy, superficial-deep heat applications, and a basic knee exercise program at inpatient clinic.
30
Outpatient Physical Therapy
Group 2 received 21 physical therapy sessions, including electrotherapy, superficial-deep heat applications, and a basic knee exercise program at outpatient clinic.
22
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInpatient Physical TherapyOutpatient Physical TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Body Mass Index30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
26.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
28.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Kellgren Lawrence Grading
grade 1/2
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Kellgren Lawrence Grading
grade 3
14 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Kellgren Lawrence Grading
grade 4
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Occupation
unemployed
29 Participants18 Participants47 Participants
Occupation
working
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Occupational intensity
heavy
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Occupational intensity
light
28 Participants17 Participants45 Participants
Occupational intensity
moderate
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
30 Participants22 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants16 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Trauma history presence
absent
24 Participants17 Participants41 Participants
Trauma history presence
present
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Fall Risk Assessment; Hendrich II Fall Risk Scale

The scale includes seven items. These items are confusion & disorientation, depression, change in excretion, dizziness, gender, antiepileptic & benzodiazepine use, and get up and walk test. The final score is the sum of these scores; (the score range is between 0-16; 16 is the highest possible score) Patients five or more scores on the scale are considered to be at high risk.

Time frame: Change from Baseline Hendrich II Fall Risk Scale at 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Inpatient Physical TherapyFall Risk Assessment; Hendrich II Fall Risk Scale1 score on a scale
Outpatient Physical TherapyFall Risk Assessment; Hendrich II Fall Risk Scale1 score on a scale
Primary

Median Total Cost Per Participant for Health Care

median total expenses for health care at the end of the study

Time frame: baseline-six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Inpatient Physical TherapyMedian Total Cost Per Participant for Health Care552.4 euros
Outpatient Physical TherapyMedian Total Cost Per Participant for Health Care276.3 euros
Primary

Pain; Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Patients were requested to sign their pain level on a 10 cm horizontal line with terminal ends of 'no pain' and 'the worst pain'

Time frame: Change from Baseline VAS scores at 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Inpatient Physical TherapyPain; Visual Analog Scale (VAS)4 cm
Outpatient Physical TherapyPain; Visual Analog Scale (VAS)4 cm
Primary

Physical Function; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index

WOMAC questionnaire includes five items for pain, two for stiffness, and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). All the items are scored on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores indicating a higher level of symptoms or physical disability.

Time frame: Change from Baseline WOMAC scores at 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Inpatient Physical TherapyPhysical Function; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index26.5 score on a scale
Outpatient Physical TherapyPhysical Function; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index18 score on a scale
Primary

Quality of Life; Short-Form 36-General Health

Short-Form 36 (SF-36) which is composed of eight multi-item scales as bodily pain, physical functioning, social functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, vitality, general health, mental health. Each score of these scales ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicating higher QoL.

Time frame: Change from Baseline Short-Form 36 scores at 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Inpatient Physical TherapyQuality of Life; Short-Form 36-General Health-7.5 score on a scale
Outpatient Physical TherapyQuality of Life; Short-Form 36-General Health-7.5 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026