Skip to content

Orthokine Therapy in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Orthokine Therapy in Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Does the Route of Administration Really Matter

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04734327
Acronym
OLDDD
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-02-02
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Region

Keywords

degenerative disc disease, lumbar spine, conservative treatment, Orthokine

Brief summary

The aim of the trial is the comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of Orthokine administration (periradicular or epidural) in lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (LDDD) is a serious, global health problem for patients from the third decade of life. It is assumed that 75-85% of the population suffer from pain in the lumbar spine at least once during their lifetime (vital morbidity), and 3-5% of the population suffer from root-type pain. The annual prevalence of the spine complaints in the United States alone ranges from 15 to 20%, and in Europe it ranges from 25 to 45%. In addition to the immeasurable losses associated with impaired patient activity and a significant reduction in the quality of their life, LBP is the greatest burden for the world economy, measured by the years lived with disability (YLD) index due to a significant reduction in the productivity and professional ability of patients affected by LBP. AIM: Assessment of the effectiveness of symptomatic treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (LDDD) with the autologous Orthokine serum, comparison of two methods of its application - epidural or periradicular. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial without blinding SETTING: Open study for outpatients, single center study POPULATION: local population METHODS: Two groups of patients (A, B) with confirmed LDDD by MRI, without gender or age limitation, meeting the health conditions according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There will be 50 people in each group (100 people in total). Group A - therapy with Orthokine serum - a total of 4 injections of 2 doses at weekly intervals (4 doses of 4 ml of serum in total), injections will be performed into the epidural space from an interlaminar access under ultrasound guidance by the same operator. Group B - therapy with Orthokine serum - a total of 4 injections of 1 or 2 doses depending on the number of levels occupied at weekly intervals (a total of 4 doses of 4 ml of serum), injections will be performed periradicular (transforaminal) under ultrasound guidance by the same operator. Assessment tools: Numeric Rating Scale NRS (0-10), Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire, Roland Morris questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire Control points W0 - before the therapy, W1 - 1 month after the last dose of serum W2 - 3 months after the last dose of serum W3 - 6 months after the last serum dose.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOrthokine periradicular injection

Ultrasound guided injections

PROCEDUREOrthokine epidural injection

Ultrasound guided injections

Sponsors

Sutherland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical symptoms of LDDD in the lumbar region 2. LDDD confirmed by MRI 3. No contraindications to injections (hemorrhagic diathesis, anticoagulants, skin lesions) 4. An adult consenting to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of severe neurological deficits requiring surgery 2. Discopathy of other origin - traumatic, spondylolisthesis, cancer, infection, inflammatory systemic diseases 3. Previous surgical treatment in the lumbar spine 4. Mental state that prevents cooperation during injection 5. Contraindications for injection (hemorrhagic diathesis, anticoagulants, skin lesions) 5\. Lack of consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 24 weeksTime Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 24 weeksTime Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 24 weeksTime Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to 24 weeks0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 4 weekChange from baseline to 4 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 12 weekChange from baseline to 12 weeksEQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeksDisease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline to 4 weeks0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline to 12 weeks0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026