Skip to content

Electrical Stimulation in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Evaluation of the Effects of Electrical Stimulation in Women With Pelvic Organ

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04733885
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-02-02
Start date
2021-02-15
Completion date
2022-02-01
Last updated
2024-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse, electrical stimulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to search the effects of electrical stimulation on clinical symptoms such as pelvic floor muscle strength, stage of POP, symptoms of pelvic floor, quality of life and sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

Detailed description

This study is planned as a prospective, sham radomized controlled study. Individuals who volunteered to participate in the study, complying with the inclusion criteria and signed the consent paper will be randomly allocated into ES and Sham ES groups. The study includes women aged 18-65 diagnosed with staged 1-2 POP by the physician.All patients were evaluated by the same doctor who performed the POP-Q measurement, who was blinded to the baseline results. The treatment of patients will be given by the same therapist. Measurements will be made 3 times at baseline (before treatment), interim period (4th week) and after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEExperimental

Current application will be made in the frequency range of 20-50 Hz. The Chattanooga (Intelect Neo) device with interfering current will be used for treatment, vacuum electrodes will be made in the form of 4 pole application. Two electrodes to the outside of the inguinal ligament, the other two electrodes will be placed on the upper inner part of the thigh.ES applications will be performed in the supine position with head and knee pillow supported.

DEVICEControl

The Chattanooga (Intelect Neo) device with interfering current will be used for treatment, vacuum electrodes will be made in the form of 4 pole application. Two electrodes to the outside of the inguinal ligament, the other two electrodes will be placed on the upper inner part of the thigh. The same device used in ES application to the sham group will be attached to the patients, however, active ES will not be issued from the device and only vacuum will turn on. ES applications will be performed in the supine position with head and knee pillow supported.

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
CollaboratorOTHER
Necmettin Erbakan University
CollaboratorOTHER
KTO Karatay University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being in the age range of 18-65 , * Having stage1-2 symptomatic prolapse according to the POP-Q system, * Being a volunteer and literate

Exclusion criteria

* Being pregnant, * being stage 3-4 prolapse, Those whose evaluation parameters are missing and who do not regularly participate, * Inadequate understanding and cooperation in treatment and evaluation parameters, * Have malignant disease, urinary infection, * accompanying neurological disease, diabetes mellitus and cardiopathy with complications, * have electronic and metal implant, loss of sensation, sacral peripheral nerve lesion * Patients with at least one of the kidney failure requiring hemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The prolapse stage will be measured with Simplified POP-QChange from baseline prolapse stage at 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe measurements are taken when the Valsalva maneuver is performed while the patient is in the dorsal lithotomy position. According to the reference point of the hymen, It is measured at a total of 4 points: cervix, posterior fornix, anterior and posterior vaginal wall. The stage of prolapse is graded. Stage 0: There is no prolapse. Stage 1: The most distal part of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the prolapse. Stage 2: The most distal part of the prolapse, between 1 cm above and 1 cm below the prolapse Stage 3: The most distal part of the prolapse protrudes more than 1 cm below the prolapse. Stage 4: Complete eversion of the lower genital tract

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic floor muscle strength will be measured measured with PFX Perineometer device(Cardio Design Pty Ltd, Australia)Change from baseline Pelvic floor muscle strength at 4 weeks and 8 weeksIndicators of this measuring device range from 0-12 kilo Pascal (kPa). During the measurement, The patient whose perineometer sensor is placed in her vagina, will be asked to relax and then to tighten the sensor strongly. The difference between the first and last value in the perineometer is the contraction strength. This evaluation will be repeated three times and averaged and recorded.
The pelvic organ prolapse symptoms will be assessed by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score(POP-SS).Change from baseline the pelvic organ prolapse symptoms at 4 weeks and 8 weeksPelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) consists of 7 questions whose answers are scored between 0 and 5. The total score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher the score, the higher the severity of POP symptoms.
The pelvic organ prolapse symptoms severity will be assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) .Change from baseline the pelvic organ prolapse symptoms severity at 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe PFDI comprises three subscales: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6, the ColoRectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8 and the Urinary Distress Inventory-6. The scores range from 0 to l00 for the all subscales. Higher scores signifying severe symptom.
Patients' quality of life will be assessed using the Prolapse Quality of Life Scale (P-QOL).Change from baseline quality of life at 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe scale consists of 9 fields and 20 questions. The first question is general health perception, the second question is the effect of urogenital prolapse on the quality of life, the 3rd and 4th questions are role limitations, the 5th and 6th questions are physical limitations, the 7th and 8th questions are social limitations, 9-11. questions on interpersonal relationships, 12-14. questions ask emotions, questions 15 and 16 examine sleep / energy influence, and questions 16 and 20 examine severity. The score ranges from 0-100, with a higher score indicating poor quality of life.
Patients' sexual function will be assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12)Change from baseline sexual function at 4 weeks and 8 weeksThis survey, consisting of 12 questions, includes 3 subtitles.This survey, consisting of 12 questions, includes 3 subtitles. 1-4. Questions are emotional, 5-9. questions are physical, 10-12. questions constitute subheadings containing partner dependent areas (range 0-48, with higher scores indicating better sexual functioning).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026