Skip to content

Endovascular Treatment With Versus Without Intravenous rhTNK-tPA in Stroke

Intravenous rhTNK-tPA Bridging With Endovascular Treatment Versus Endovascular Treatment Alone For Stroke Patient With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04733742
Acronym
BRIDGE-TNK
Enrollment
550
Registered
2021-02-02
Start date
2022-05-09
Completion date
2025-02-07
Last updated
2025-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

Thrombolysis, Endovascular treatment, rhTNK-tPA

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether intravenous rhTNK-tPA prior to endovascular treatment can improve 90-day functional outcome of stroke patients with large vessel occlusion who are thrombolysis-eligible within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Detailed description

The DEVT, SKIP and DIRECT-MT trials showed that endovascular treatment alone is not inferior to intravenous alteplase bridging with endovascular treatment in terms of achieving 90-day functional independence for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. The EXTEND-IA TNK part 1 and part 2 demonstrated that intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase is superior to alteplase before endovascular treatment. However, it is unclear whether intravenous tenecteplase bridging with endovascular treatment is superior to endovascular treatment alone. The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether intravenous rhTNK-tPA bridging with endovascular treatment is better than endovascular treatment alone for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion who are thrombolysis-eligible within 4.5 hours of onset.

Interventions

intravenous thrombolysis with rhTNK-tPA followed by endovascular treatment

OTHEREndovascular treatment

endovascular treatment

Sponsors

CSPC RECOMGEN PHARMACEUTICAL (GUANGZHOU) CO.,LTD
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 years or older; 2. Patient with acute ischemic stroke who is eligible for intravenous thrombolysis treatment within 4.5 hours of time last known well; 3. No significant prestroke functional disability: for age \<80 years, prestroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2; for age ≥80 years, prestroke mRS ≤1; 4. MCA-M1 or -M2, basilar artery, or posterior cerebral artery-P1 occlusion proved by CTA/MRA; 5. EVT is planned by clinical care team; 6. Written informed consent is obtained from patients and/or their legal representatives.

Exclusion criteria

1. Intracranial hemorrhage on baseline CT or MR 2. Contraindication to intravenous thrombolytics 3. Already received intravenous thrombolytic after index stroke 4. Known pregnancy, or breastfeeding, or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin test is positive on admission 5. Contraindication to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals or their alloys 6. Current participation in another investigational drug clinical trial 7. Arterial tortuosity and/or other arterial disease that would lead to unstable access platform or prevent the thrombectomy device from reaching the target vessel 8. Patient with a preexisting neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the outcome assessments 9. Patient with occlusions in two or more vascular territories (e.g. bilateral territories, or anterior and posterior circulation) 10. Mass effect or intracranial neoplasm on baseline CT or MR (except small meningioma) 11. Intracranial arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm on baseline CT or MR angiography 12. Any terminal disease with a life expectancy less than half a year 13. Unlikely to be available for follow-up at 90 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients functionally independent (mRS score 0 to 2) at 90 days90 daysfunctional independence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful reperfusion at end-of-procedure angiography15 minutes after initial angiogramevaluate vascular patency after thrombectomy
First-pass reperfusionAfter artery puncture, but before thrombectomydefined as Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction ≥2c after the first thrombectomy pass
Modified first-pass reperfusionAfter artery puncture, but before thrombectomydefined as Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b after the first thrombectomy pass
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score5 to 7 days or dischargeNeurological status
modified Rankin scale score90 daysdisability level
Proportion of patients non-disabled (mRS score 0 to 1) or return to pre-morbid mRS score at 90 days (for patients with mRS > 1)90 daysexcellent outcome
Substantial reperfusion at initial angiogramwithin 5 minutes at initial angiogramevaluate effect of tenecteplase on reperfusion
Health-related quality of life, assessed with the European Quality Five Dimensions Five Level scale (EQ-5D-5L)90 daysHealth-related quality of life
Any radiologic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hourswithin 48 hours after endovascular treatmentevaluate intracranial hemorrhage
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hourswithin 48 hours after endovascular treatmentevaluate intracranial hemorrhage (Heidelberg classification)
Mortality within 90 days90 daysevaluate death rate of the two treatment groups
Procedural-related complicationswithin 90 daysevaluate complications
Severe adverse eventswithin 90 daysevaluate any adverse events
Proportion of patients ambulatory or bodily needs-capable or better (mRS score 0 to 3)90 daysambulatory or bodily needs-capable or better

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026