Complication of Surgical or Medical Care
Conditions
Keywords
mid- and hindfoot surgical arthrodesis, osseous non-union
Brief summary
The current study aims at evaluating the effect of biofeedback of correct partial weight bearing on the rate of osseous non-union compared to conventional patient instruction without biofeedback.
Detailed description
Post-traumatic situations or instabilities of other aetiology at the level of the foot can lead to painful degenerative arthritis that necessitates surgical arthrodesis for pain relief. Surgical arthrodesis in this region though is associated with a high risk of osseous non-union (depending on the exact location up to 40%) despite standardized preparation and fixation techniques. The development of osseous non-union is associated with certain patient characteristics like active smoking, nutrition etc. Compliance to partial weight-bearing during the early postoperative phase is another contributing factor. The current study aims at evaluating the effect of biofeedback of correct partial weight bearing on the rate of osseous non-union compared to conventional patient instruction without biofeedback. All patients will postoperatively be provided with a lower- leg unloading orthosis furnished with a weight sensor that will - according to randomization - give feedback if a predefined weight threshold has been crossed or just measure weight-bearing without feedback.
Interventions
DEVICESmartsens, Gelenic AG; with biofeedback
The Smartsens is a CE certified 4-cell load sensor integrated in an insole that can be placed in any orthosis or cast. A threshold (10-50kg) can be defined at which - if higher loads are measured - an audio signal warns the patient of overloading (biofeedback). The device additionally registers loads from 0-100kg continuously.
DEVICESmartsens, Gelenic AG; without biofeedback
Patients will not be warned by an audio signal in case of overloading. The device registers loads from 0-100kg continuously.
Sponsors
Prof. Dr. med. Arno Frigg
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Radiologists assessing the primary outcome osseous non-union will be blind to the treatment allocation.
Intervention model description
Monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Indication for hind- or midfoot arthrodesis * Informed Consent * Body weight \< 90kg (according to Smartsens manufacturers recommendations)
Exclusion criteria
* Physical or mental inability to follow weight-bearing recommendations (e.g. dementia, neurologic disease, upper extremity pathology) * Participation in a potentially interfering interventional trial during the last 30 day or before wash-out of any trial medication (e.g. steroids, medications affecting bone metabolism etc.) * Previous infection at the intended surgical site * Body weight \> 90kg * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the influence of weight bearing an resting time on the development of osseous non-union after surgical arthrodesis at the level of the mid- and hindfoot. | 3 months | The primary outcome is an analysis of the rate of non-unions after mid- and hindfoot arthrodesis comparing a sensor the two patient arms with activated vs non-activated biofeedback. The rate of osseous non-unions defined as CT-morphologic union \<30% of the joint surface at 3 months in relation to the provision of biofeedback. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance i.e. adherence to weight bearing recommendations (≤ 15kg charge) with and without biofeedback. | 6 weeks | All patients will be asked to wear the orthosis with integrated sensor all day long including resting times. They are furthermore instructed to follow partial weight-bearing with 15kg (for 6 weeks). The device will record load and quantity of steps over time. In the first group, a biofeedback in form of an audio-signal will warn the patient if treatment recommendations like partial weight bearing are not followed. The control intervention will be pure instruction followed by measurements. Control patients will not receive biofeedback upon transgression of recommendations. |
| Compliance i.e. adherence to resting time recommendations (≥ 80% of time) with and without biofeedback. | 6 weeks | All patients will be asked to wear the orthosis with integrated sensor all day long including resting times. They are furthermore instructed to reduce their activity with 80% resting time. The device will record load and quantity of steps over time. In the first group, a biofeedback in form of an audio-signal will warn the patient if treatment recommendations like resting times are not followed. The control intervention will be pure instruction followed by measurements of load and quantity of steps. Control patients will not receive biofeedback upon transgression of recommendations. |
| Consumption of analgesic medication after surgery | 12 months | Consumption of analgesic medication following WHO grading. Data will be collected at any scheduled (2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months) or unscheduled follow-up visits. |
| Patient's quality of life after surgery | 12 months | Quality of life will be analysed by using EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire at baseline and after 3 months and 12 months. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. |
| Patient's satisfaction | 12 months | Patient satisfaction will be documented after 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months by using net promotor score (NPS). NPS is the percentage of customers rating their likelihood to recommend the service to a friend or colleague as 9 or 10 (promoters) minus the percentage rating this at 6 or below (detractors) on a scale from 0 to 10. |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed