Skip to content

Treating Corneal Thinning Conditions With CCL Vario Riboflavin (CXL)

Safety and Effectiveness of the CCL Vario System for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Eyes With Corneal Thinning Conditions

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04731727
Acronym
CXL
Enrollment
600
Registered
2021-02-01
Start date
2021-06-30
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2021-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus, Unstable

Brief summary

Study is testing the efficacy of treating corneal thinning conditions with Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) and the application on UV Light.

Detailed description

Corneal thinning conditions, i.e. keratoconus or ectasia, weaken the cornea which then causes the front of the eye to bulge out. This results in distorted vision and could eventually result in the need for a cornea transplant. This study proposes to conclude that saturating the cornea with vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) and then applying 365nm wavelength of Ultra Violet Light will result in the various layers of corneal tissue linking together. This cross linking results in a stronger cornea which is designed to halt the progression of keratoconus or ectasia. This treatment is already being successfully used in Europe.

Interventions

DRUGRiboflavin

Corneal cross linking achieved by combination of Riboflavin and ultraviolet light

Sponsors

Kent Wellish MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of central or inferior corneal steepening * Axial topography consistent with keratoconus, post-surgical ectasia, or pellucid marginal degeneration * Presence of one or more findings associated with keratoconus or pellucid marginal degeneration, such as: * Fleischer ring * Vogt's striae * Decentered corneal apex * Munson's sign * Rizutti's sign * Apical corneal scarring consistent with Bowman's breaks * Scissoring of the retinoscopic reflex * Crab-claw appearance on topography * Steepest keratometry (Kmax) value \> or = 47.20 D * I-S keratometry difference \> 1.5 D on the Orbscan map * Posterior corneal elevation \> 16 microns * Thinnest corneal point \< 485 microns * Post LASIK/PRK stromal ablation depth \< 300 microns or expected keratometry \> 47.2 D, or post-PRK/SMILE in keratoconus suspect eyes * Bacterial or fungal corneal keratitis persistent and not responding despite \> 2 weeks of standard antimicrobial therapy or with rapid progression of corneal thinning, with loss of \> 25% corneal thickness * Contact Lens Wearers Only: * Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction: Contact Lens Type Minimum Discontinuation Time Soft 1 Week Soft Extended Wear 2 Weeks Soft Toric 3 Weeks Rigid Gas Permeable 2 Weeks per decade of wear * Signed written informed consent * Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Eyes classified as either normal or atypical normal on the severity grading scheme * Corneal pachymetry at the screening exam that is \< 400 microns at the thinnest point in the eye(s) to be treated when the transepithelial (isotonic) riboflavin solution alone will be used or \< 300 microns when the hypotonic riboflavin will be used. * Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications, for example: 1. History of or active corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, recurrent erosion syndrome, acanthamoeba, etc.) 2. Clinically significant corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone that is not related to keratoconus or, in the investigator's opinion, will interfere with the cross linking procedure * Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study * A known sensitivity to study medications * Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests * Patients with a current condition that, in the physician's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Best Corrected Visual AcuityBaseline and 1 yearUse a standard eye chart to determine changes in the subject's best Visual Acuity (with glasses or contact) performed by research staff
Change in Uncorrected Visual AcuityBaseline and 1 yearUse a standard eye chart to determine changes in the subject's best Visual Acuity (without glasses or contact) performed by clinic technician
Occurrence of Adverse EventsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearSurgeon notes any occurrence of adverse events related to the treatment

Contacts

Primary ContactTony F Sterrett
tsterrett@wellish.com702-932-4265
Backup ContactKent L Wellish, MD
klwellish@gmail.com702-339-2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026