Skip to content

LEVOSIMENDAN to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Severe Cardiogenic Shock Patients

LEVOSIMENDAN to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Severe Cardiogenic Shock Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04728932
Acronym
LEVOECMO
Enrollment
206
Registered
2021-01-28
Start date
2021-08-27
Completion date
2024-11-09
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication

Keywords

LEVOSIMENDAN

Brief summary

In the last decade, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has become the first-line therapy in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. VA-ECMO provides both respiratory and cardiac support, is easy to insert, even at the bedside, provides stable flow rates, and is associated with less organ failure after implantation compared to large biventricular assist-devices that require open-heart surgery. In patients with potentially reversible cardiac failure (e.g. myocarditis, myocardial stunning post-myocardial infarction, post-cardiotomy or post-cardiac arrest), VA-ECMO might be weaned after a few days of support and used as a bridge to recovery. Although considered as the ultimate life-saving technology for refractory cardiac failure, veno-arterial ECMO is still associated with severe complications. Specifically, excessive LV afterload and lack of LV unloading under VA-ECMO might induce LV stasis with thrombus formation, pulmonary edema, myocardial ischemia caused by ventricular distension and ultimately increase mortality. ECMO support also exposes to many complications such as infections, hemorrhage or peripheral vascular embolism. These complications are more frequent with prolonged support and are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, prolonged ICU and hospital stays and higher costs. Levosimendan, which acts to sensitize myocardial contractile proteins to calcium, improves cardiac contractility without increasing the intracellular calcium concentration. Unlike traditional inotropes such as dobutamine, levosimendan neither increases myocardial oxygen consumption nor impairs diastolic function or possess proarrhythmic effects. It also influences the opening of ATP-dependent potassium channels, including those in vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to coronary, pulmonary, and peripheral vasodilation and antiinflammatory, antioxidative, antiapoptotic, anti-stunning and cardioprotective effects. Additionally, Levosimendan which has a long lasting action (up to 7-9 d), resulting from the formation of active metabolite, may be used as a single 24h perfusion. In recent preliminary studies, the drug was associated with accelerated weaning from VA-ECMO and even improved survival. Therefore, a multicenter randomized trial with sufficient statistical power is needed in refractory cardiogenic shock patients supported by VA-ECMO to test if the early administration of Levosimendan can facilitate and accelerate VA-ECMO weaning, and ultimately translate in significantly less morbidity, reduced ICU and hospital length of stays and associated costs.

Interventions

DRUGLevosimendan

A continuous infusion of Levosimendan over 24h

DRUGPlacebo of Levosimendan

A continuous infusion of Placebo of Levosimendan over 24h

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Acute cardiogenic shock patient refractory to conventional therapy placed on VA-ECMO support in the preceding 48h. 2. Obtain informed consent from a close relative or surrogate. According to the specifications of emergency consent, randomization without the close relative or surrogate consent could be performed. Close relative/surrogate/family consent will be asked as soon as possible. The patient will be asked to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \<18 2. Pregnant or lactating women 3. Initiation of VA-ECMO \>48 h 4. Resuscitation \>30 minutes in the 48 hours before ECMO (cumulative low-flow time). If a low-flow episode occurs before the 48 hours window prior to ECMO, patients must fully recover consciousness to be randomized. 5. Irreversible neurological pathology 6. End-stage cardiomyopathy with no hope of LV function recovery 7. Mechanical complication of myocardial infarction 8. Aortic regurgitation \> II 9. VA-ECMO for pulmonary embolism 10. VA-ECMO for cardiotoxic drug intoxication 11. ECMO after left-ventricle assist device implantation 12. VA-ECMO in heart transplant patients 13. Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II \>90 14. Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C) and other severe hepatic insufficiency 15. Chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis 16. Known hypersensitivity to levosimendan 17. History of torsades de pointes in the 30 days prior to inclusion 18. History of epilepsy 19. Individuals under guardianship, or permanently legally incompetent adults 20. Participation to another interventional study 21. Patient with a weight over 180 kg 22. Known hypersensitivity to polyvitamin CERNEVIT® 23. In case of hypervitaminosis to any vitamin contained in this formulation, 24. In case of severe hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, treatment, pathology and/or disorders leading to severe hypercalcemia and/or hypercalciuria 25. In combination with vitamin A or retinoids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to successful ECMO weaning within the 30 days following randomizationDay 30

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total duration of ECMO supportBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Number of ECMO-free daysBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Duration of ICU stayBetween inclusion and Day 60
Duration of hospitalization stayBetween inclusion and Day 60
Major adverse cardiovascular eventsDay 30, Day 60defined as death, cardiac transplant, escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device, stroke, dialysis, re-hospitalization for heart failure
Time to improvement in hemodynamic parametersBetween inclusion and Day 60
Time to hemodynamic stabilizationBetween inclusion and Day 60
MortalityDay 30, Day 60
Duration of hemodynamic support with catecholaminesBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Number of days alive without hemodynamic supportBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Duration of mechanical ventilationBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Number of days alive without mechanical ventilationBetween inclusion and Day 30/Day 60
Left ventricular function assessed with echocardiographyDay 30
Incidence of adverse drug reactionsBetween inclusion and Day 60
Days with organ failure asessed by sequential organ failure assessmentBetween inclusion and Day 30

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026