Suicide
Conditions
Keywords
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicide (CAMS), University Students
Brief summary
Suicide is the 2nd leading cause of death among college students and suicidal ideation and suicide-related behaviors are a frequent presenting problem at college counseling centers (CCCs), which are overburdened. Studies show that some students respond rapidly to treatment, whereas others require considerably more resources. Evidence-based adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) are needed to address this heterogeneity in responsivity and complexity. ATSs individualize treatment via decision rules specifying how the type and intensity of an intervention can be sequenced based on risk factors, response, or compliance. The purpose of this multisite study is to investigate the effectiveness of four adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) to treat college students who report suicidal ideation when first seeking services at their college counseling center This multisite study will enroll moderately to severely suicidal college students in the emerging adulthood phase (ages 18-25) seeking services at CCCs. This Sequential Multi-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) will have two stages of intervention. In Stage 1, 700 participants from four CCCs will be randomized to 4-8 weeks of: 1) a suicide-focused treatment - Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) or 2) Treatment as Usual (TAU). Sufficient responders to either intervention will discontinue services/be stepped down. Non-responders will be re-randomized to one of two Stage 2 higher intensity/dosage intervention options for an additional 4-16 weeks: 1) CAMS (either continued or administered for the first time) or 2) Comprehensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), which includes individual therapy, skills group, and phone/text coaching for the clients and peer consultation for the counselors.
Detailed description
We will enroll moderately to severely suicidal college students in the emerging adulthood phase (ages 18-25) seeking services at CCCs. Eighty-Five participants (N=85) from four CCCs will be randomized to one of three treatments delivered via a hybrid model: (1) a suicide-focused treatment - Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) for 4-8 weeks (n=35); (2) Treatment as Usual (TAU) for 4-8 weeks (n=15); or (3) Comprehensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for 16 weeks (n=35), which includes individual therapy, skills training, phone/text coaching for the clients, and peer consultation for the counselors. Sufficient responders to CAMS or TAU will discontinue services/be stepped down after 4-8 weeks. Non-responders to CAMS or TAU will be re-randomized to one of two higher intensity/dosage intervention options for an additional 8 weeks of treatment: (1) CAMS (either continued or administered for the first time) or (2) Comprehensive DBT. For the feasibility study, we will also enroll 12 CCC counselors (3 per site) who will serve as study counselor participants and periodically complete measures focused on the experience of counselors working with suicidal college students.
Interventions
4-8 weeks of TAU treatment
4-8 weeks of CAMS treatment
up to 16 weeks of DBT treatment
Up to 8 weeks of CAMS treatment
Up to 8 weeks of DBT treatment
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Participants will be randomized to one of three treatments delivered via a hybrid model: (1) a suicide-focused treatment - Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) for 4-8 weeks (n=35); (2) Treatment as Usual (TAU) for 4-8 weeks (n=15); or (3) Comprehensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for 16 weeks (n=35), which includes individual therapy, skills training, phone/text coaching for the clients, and peer consultation for the counselors. Sufficient responders to CAMS or TAU will discontinue services/be stepped down after 4-8 weeks. Non-responders to CAMS or TAU will be re-randomized to one of two higher intensity/dosage intervention options for an additional 8 weeks of treatment: (1) CAMS (either continued or administered for the first time) or (2) Comprehensive DBT. There is an 8th Arm/Group of Consented Study Counselors from each of the 4 sites.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Enrolled at the university; 2. Eligible to receive counseling services either in person or remotely at the campus CCC (e.g., some students who are living in specific states may not be eligible for therapeutic services). 3. 18 to 25 years of age; 4. Moderate to severe SI over the last two weeks indicated by a score of greater than or equal to 2 on the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS-34) question, I have thoughts of ending my life (range is 0 not at all like me to 4 extremely like me); and 5. Agree to video recording of all therapy and assessment sessions.
Exclusion criteria
1. Students who are deemed clinically inappropriate to receive services at the CCC by an intake counselor because of imminent risk, severe psychosis, or inability to remain enrolled in school (e.g., academic failure); 2. Students being unable to remain enrolled in their university long enough to go through the minimum number of sessions for Stage 1 (4 sessions); 3. Students who have received services at the CCC within the last three months (i.e., ATSs must be based on a new treatment episode).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization | To the end of initial Randomization (up to 1 week) | Among students who are eligible to participate in the study and approached about the study by an intake worker, the number who agree to randomization to one of three treatments will be reported. |
| Counselor Recruitment | To the end of initial counselor recruitment (up to 2 weeks) | Among the counselors eligible to participate in the study, the number of counselors from each site who agree to participate. |
| Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale | To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks) | Existing gold-standard adherence instruments for DBT will be used to rate a selection of sessions to assess counselors' fidelity to implementing the adaptive treatment strategies. Each item is rated on a scale where 0 = not used/not necessary, 1-3 = below adherence, 4 = minimum threshold for adherence, and 5 = adherent with high sufficiency. The DBT ACS is scored by averaging all non-zero items to create a computed global score where 3.8 and higher is considered adherent. |
| Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale | To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks) | Existing gold-standard adherence instruments for CAMS will be used to rate a selection of sessions to assess counselors' fidelity to implementing the adaptive treatment strategies. The measure consists of 14 items evaluating clinician performance, all rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Poor) to 6 (Excellent). A session is rated as adherent with a score of 3.5 or greater. |
| Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks) | — |
| Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks) | — |
| Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks) | CSQ items are rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. |
| Counselor Training Satisfaction | To end of initial training period (up to 4 weeks) | An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) evaluation surveys for the CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) and DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) online trainings. Item scores range from 1 (Not at all valuable) to 5 (Extremely valuable). |
| Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | To the end of stage 1 (up to 8 weeks) | An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Items rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Participants were assessed for overall mean treatment satisfaction rating based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The counselor version of the CSQ is completed by the counselor, based on their assessment of how the subject appreciated and benefited from treatment. |
| Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Beginning to end of Stage 2 (up to 8 weeks) | An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Items rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Participants were assessed for overall mean treatment satisfaction rating based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The counselor version of the CSQ is completed by the counselor, based on their assessment of how the subject appreciated and benefited from treatment. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
College students seeking treatment at college counseling center. Eligible students endorsed suicidal thoughts at intake.
Pre-assignment details
While they were consented to assure they fully understood the rights and responsibilities of their study role, data about Study Counselors is not collected as it is for the Student Participants. Per CT.gov request, they are however being included as a separate 8th Arm/Group for purposes of this data reporting.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CAMS to Maintenance Subject assigned to CAMS for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 CAMS Responder, thus placed into ongoing Maintenance/Monitoring.
CAMS - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of CAMS treatment | 12 |
| CAMS to CAMS Subject assigned to CAMS for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 CAMS Insufficient Responder, then assigned to Phase 2 CAMS.
CAMS - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of CAMS treatment
CAMS - Phase 2: Up to 8 weeks of CAMS treatment | 8 |
| CAMS to DBT Subject assigned to CAMS for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 CAMS Insufficient Responder, then assigned to Phase 2 DBT.
CAMS - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of CAMS treatment
DBT - Phase 2: Up to 8 weeks of DBT treatment | 10 |
| TAU to Maintenance Subject assigned to TAU for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 TAU Responder, thus placed into ongoing Maintenance/Monitoring.
TAU - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of TAU treatment | 4 |
| TAU to CAMS Subject assigned to TAU for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 TAU Insufficient Responder, then assigned to Phase 2 CAMS.
TAU - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of TAU treatment
CAMS - Phase 2: Up to 8 weeks of CAMS treatment | 7 |
| TAU to DBT Subject assigned to TAU for Phase 1. Subject is a Phase 1 TAU Insufficient Responder, then assigned to Phase 2 DBT.
TAU - Phase 1: 4-8 weeks of TAU treatment
DBT - Phase 2: Up to 8 weeks of DBT treatment | 1 |
| DBT Only Subject Assigned to DBT for Phase 1, continuing up to 16 weeks.
DBT - Phase 1 and 2: up to 16 weeks of DBT treatment | 26 |
| Study Counselors Consented Study Counselors from each of the 4 sites. Data collected regarding the Counselors is minimal and is maintained completely separately from the other 7 Student Participant Arms/Groups. | 16 |
| Total | 84 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Study drop | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Treatment drop | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | CAMS to Maintenance | CAMS to CAMS | CAMS to DBT | TAU to Maintenance | TAU to CAMS | TAU to DBT | DBT Only | Study Counselors | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 21.08 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.19 | 20.37 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07 | 20.90 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38 | 19.25 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 | 19.86 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34 | 20.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 19.88 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 | 37.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05 | 20.26 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants | 1 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 14 Participants | 7 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 26 Participants | 16 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 16 Participants | 13 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 24 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 30 | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 5 | 1 / 9 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 1 | 3 / 26 | 9 / 30 | 3 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 1 | 4 / 26 | 4 / 30 | 1 / 12 |
Outcome results
Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Items rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Participants were assessed for overall mean treatment satisfaction rating based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The counselor version of the CSQ is completed by the counselor, based on their assessment of how the subject appreciated and benefited from treatment.
Time frame: To the end of stage 1 (up to 8 weeks)
Population: Participants who completed Stage 1 of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 3.46 score on a scale |
| Rutgers University | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.96 score on a scale |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.92 score on a scale |
| University of Oregon | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 3.56 score on a scale |
| TAU to CAMS | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.79 score on a scale |
| TAU to DBT | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.88 score on a scale |
| DBT Only | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 1 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.96 score on a scale |
Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Items rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Participants were assessed for overall mean treatment satisfaction rating based on counselors' responses on the counselor version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The counselor version of the CSQ is completed by the counselor, based on their assessment of how the subject appreciated and benefited from treatment.
Time frame: Beginning to end of Stage 2 (up to 8 weeks)
Population: Participants who completed Stage 2 of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rutgers University | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.88 score on a scale |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 2.90 score on a scale |
| TAU to CAMS | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 3.00 score on a scale |
| DBT Only | Counselor Assessment of Participant Study Satisfaction During Stage 2 of Treatment as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | 3.24 score on a scale |
Counselor Recruitment
Among the counselors eligible to participate in the study, the number of counselors from each site who agree to participate.
Time frame: To the end of initial counselor recruitment (up to 2 weeks)
Population: Counselors meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Counselor Recruitment | 4 Participants |
| Rutgers University | Counselor Recruitment | 4 Participants |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Counselor Recruitment | 4 Participants |
| University of Oregon | Counselor Recruitment | 4 Participants |
Counselor Training Satisfaction
An overall mean treatment satisfaction rating and the associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated based on counselors' responses on the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) evaluation surveys for the CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) and DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) online trainings. Item scores range from 1 (Not at all valuable) to 5 (Extremely valuable).
Time frame: To end of initial training period (up to 4 weeks)
Population: We had 16 total consented counselors, and 2 entire rounds of DBT training, which some attended twice. 8 counselors attended both (8x2=16), while 4 others attended Round 1 only and another 4 attended Round 2 only. Therefore, a total of 24 DBT training ratings for 16 counselors. Ten counselors attended one CAMS session each.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Counselor Training Satisfaction | 4.48 score on a scale |
| Rutgers University | Counselor Training Satisfaction | 4.70 score on a scale |
Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization
Among students who are eligible to participate in the study and approached about the study by an intake worker, the number who agree to randomization to one of three treatments will be reported.
Time frame: To the end of initial Randomization (up to 1 week)
Population: Students meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization | 8 Participants |
| Rutgers University | Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization | 24 Participants |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization | 20 Participants |
| University of Oregon | Number of Eligible Students Who Agree to Randomization | 16 Participants |
Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition
Time frame: To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 5.75 sessions | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Rutgers University | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 5.75 sessions | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 9.10 sessions | Standard Deviation 3.41 |
| University of Oregon | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 6.00 sessions | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| TAU to CAMS | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 7.29 sessions | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
| TAU to DBT | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 7.00 sessions | Standard Deviation 0 |
| DBT Only | Number of Sessions Attended by Students in Each Treatment Condition | 11.31 sessions | Standard Deviation 4.54 |
Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial)
Time frame: To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 0 Participants |
| Rutgers University | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 5 Participants |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 4 Participants |
| University of Oregon | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 0 Participants |
| TAU to CAMS | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 3 Participants |
| TAU to DBT | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 1 Participants |
| DBT Only | Number of Students Who Attrite From the Study (by Withdrawing Early From Treatment or Dropping Out of the Trial) | 10 Participants |
Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
CSQ items are rated from 1-4, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction.
Time frame: To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks)
Population: Participants with data collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Rutgers University | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 2 Treatment | 3.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Rutgers University | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 2 Treatment | 2.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| University of Oregon | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| TAU to CAMS | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| TAU to CAMS | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 2 Treatment | 3.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| DBT Only | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 2 Treatment | 3.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| DBT Only | Student Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | Student CSQ at Stage 1 Treatment | 3.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale
Existing gold-standard adherence instruments for CAMS will be used to rate a selection of sessions to assess counselors' fidelity to implementing the adaptive treatment strategies. The measure consists of 14 items evaluating clinician performance, all rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Poor) to 6 (Excellent). A session is rated as adherent with a score of 3.5 or greater.
Time frame: To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks)
Population: Participants whose CAMS sessions were rated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale | 4.05 score on a scale |
| Rutgers University | Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale | 4.66 score on a scale |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale | 4.45 score on a scale |
| University of Oregon | Treatment Adherence as Measured by CAMS (Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality) Adherence Rating Scale | 4.77 score on a scale |
Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale
Existing gold-standard adherence instruments for DBT will be used to rate a selection of sessions to assess counselors' fidelity to implementing the adaptive treatment strategies. Each item is rated on a scale where 0 = not used/not necessary, 1-3 = below adherence, 4 = minimum threshold for adherence, and 5 = adherent with high sufficiency. The DBT ACS is scored by averaging all non-zero items to create a computed global score where 3.8 and higher is considered adherent.
Time frame: To the end of treatment period (up to 16 weeks)
Population: Participants whose DBT sessions were rated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Duke University | Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale | 3.5 score on a scale |
| Rutgers University | Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale | 3.68 score on a scale |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale | 3.72 score on a scale |
| University of Oregon | Treatment Adherence as Measured by DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) Adherence Rating Scale | 3.81 score on a scale |