Skip to content

The Effects of Antenatal Interventions With Artistic Content Given to Pregnant Women

The Effects of Antenatal Interventions With Artistic Content Given to Pregnant Women on Mental Health and Maternal Attachment Levels

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04728256
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-01-28
Start date
2018-03-05
Completion date
2018-08-29
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antenatal Care, Mental Health

Keywords

Antenatal care, Depression, Diary, Laughter therapy, Maternal attachment, Music listening

Brief summary

Aim:This study aimed to evaluate the effects of music listening, laughter therapy, and diary keeping, given as group sessions to pregnant women in the last trimester on mothers' overall mental health and maternal attachment status in the postpartum period. Method: The study was a nonrandomized study including a control group for which the post-test procedure was performed alone. The measurements were also repeated at intervals for those in the intervention group. The study was conducted in two separate family health centers.The women with the following constituted the study inclusion criteria: Pregnant women over the age of 18, those with pregnancy between 16-24 weeks of gestation, and those with literacy in Turkish. The data were collected through Beck Depression Inventory, Edinburg Postpartum Depression Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Maternal Attachment Scale to comprehensively evaluate mental health status. All participants responded to the personal information form prepared for the study. Keywords:Antenatal care, depression, diary, laughter therapy, maternal attachment, music listening

Detailed description

The intervention group consists of pregnant women in the second trimester who were registered with two family health centers.The Gpower 3.1.9.2. program was used to determine the number of participants in both groups. The sample size was found as 25 for each group by accepting the effect size to be wide (0.82), the alpha value (0.05), and the power (0.80). In the experimental group, sampling adequacy for within comparisons was evaluated with Gpower 3.1.9.2. program. It was determined that the sample was sufficient for partial eta squared values obtained from the study. (10 participants were adequate for each group).The researcher (SK) obtained the list of registered women with a pregnancy between 16-24 gestational weeks. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the participants were included in the intervention group via face-to-face interviews. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant, and the interventions were performed in this group. Mothers receiving standard antenatal care in the prenatal period, giving birth, and having a three-month-old baby constituted the control group. The control group was created after the procedures were completed for those in the intervention group. Interventions such as music listening, laughter therapy, and diary keeping were carried out for each woman in the intervention group.A six-session antenatal care program included both music listening and laughter therapy and was designed for those in the study group as a session every week. The program was carried out by arranging a music session for one week and a laughter therapy session over the following week. Also, the notes uttered by pregnant women were discussed at the week laughter listening sessions were performed. Data from the intervention group were collected four times as pretest (after providing informed contest), first-interval measurement (fourth week of the intervention), second-interval measurement (the first month following the birth), and post-test (the third month following the delivery). Even so, the post-test was administered only for the controls. The data pooled after the study were analyzed using the computer software of SPSS 22.0, OpenMeta\[Analyst\], and JAPS 09.0 statistical analysis packages. The findings were tested at p\<0.05 of the significance level.Similarity analyses of the study and control groups were performed with chi-square (the Pearson and Yates correction). The post-test scores of BDI, EPDS, BSI, and MAS in the intervention and control groups were compared through the t test in independent groups, and Cohen's d and confidence interval (CI) was utilized in the assessment of effect size. Four measurement results of the intervention group were compared with those of variance analysis through repeated measurements, and the partial eta square and CI were used to evaluate the effect size. Two-way variance analysis for repeated measurements was used in evaluating the group/time interactions of the changes in terms of the overall mental health scores of the group with and without depression symptoms in the intervention group at the four time-point.In Cohen's d calculation, if d is 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80, the calculation demonstrates small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively (d≤ 0.20 weak, d\<0.50 medium and d≥ 0.80 large effect size). However, in evaluating the partial eta square, 0.01, 0.06, and 0.14 were considered small, medium, and large, respectively.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLaughter therapy+Music listening+Keeping diary

Laughter therapy was carried out by the researcher as a total of three sessions every 15 days, and each session lasted 30 minutes. Participants listened to the types of music that they like (pop, Turkish folk music). In the meeting room in FHC, Two professional artists performed music recitals with a guitar and saz (qopuz) to pregnant women, and pregnant women actively participated in this process. The performance was carried out as three sessions, once every 15 days, and each session took 40 minutes. In addition to music listening and laughter therapy, the pregnant women were asked to keep a diary to write down their emotions about their health status, pregnancy and baby. Then, each participant had an opportunity to explain her emotions or replies to the questions during the group therapy sessions every 15 days so that pregnant women were able to express their feelings.

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The study was a nonrandomized study including a control group for which the post-test procedure was performed alone. The measurements were also repeated at intervals for those in the intervention group. The study intervention group was carried out with a total of 50 pregnant women, 25 of whom were controls.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women over the age of 18, * Between 16-24 weeks of gestation, * Can understand and speak Turkish, * Pregnant women who agreed to participate in the study after giving information about the study and those with literacy in Turkish.

Exclusion criteria

* A psychiatric disorder (through self-reporting), * The existence of chronic disease for laughter therapy (heart diseases, hypertension, hemorrhoids, urinary incontinence, and epilepsy, etc.), * Pregnancy with infertility treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Beck Depression InventoryChange from baseline to 24 weeksMental Health:The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item self-reporting scale consisting of emotional, cognitive, somatic and motivational components to measure the level and severity changes of depressive symptoms. In BDI, it is seen that as the total score obtained from the scale increases, the individual's level of experiencing depressive emotions increases proportionally. In addition, BDI scores can be classified as minimal depression between 0-9 points, mild depression between 10-16, moderate depression between 17-29, and severe depression between 30-63 points. The intervention was applied at 16-24 weeks of gestation and at the 3rd month of postpartum.
Edinburg Postpartum Depression ScaleChange from baseline to 24 weeksMental Health: The Edinburg Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) was designed with the aim of screening to determine the risks of depression in pregnancy and postpartum periods. However, EPDS cannot be used to diagnose depression. EPDS is a 4-point likert self-reporting scale and consists of 10 items. The intervention was applied at 16-24 weeks of gestation and at the 3rd month of postpartum.
Brief Symptom InventoryChange from baseline to 24 weeksMental Health:Brief Symptom Inventory was developed to determine the individuals' depression, anxiety, sleep, somatization, obsessive-compulsive disorder and interpersonal sensitivity status as the short form of SCL-90-R Scale.The items are scored between 0 and 4, corresponding to none and too much. BSI has three global indexes as discomfort severity, total symptom and discomfort symptom indexes. The increase obtained from the scores in these indexes demonstrates individuals' negative experiences regarding overall mental health status. The intervention was applied at 16-24 weeks of gestation and at the 3rd month of postpartum.
The Maternal Attachment ScaleThe third month following the birthMaternal Attachment:The Maternal Attachment Scale (MAS) measures the attachment for maternal affection.MAS is a 4-point Likert-type scale with 26 items, each ranging from always to never. The score obtained from the scale varies between 26 and 104.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026