Skip to content

Evaluation of Motor-Related Beta-Activity in Relation to Naturalistic Movement in Healthy Adult Subjects

Evaluation of Motor-Related Beta-Activity in Relation to Naturalistic Movement in Healthy Adult Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04727944
Acronym
MOBETA
Enrollment
31
Registered
2021-01-27
Start date
2022-07-28
Completion date
2025-01-06
Last updated
2025-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor Cortex, Primary Motor Cortex

Keywords

Beta burst activity, Naturalistic motor behavior, Neuroimaging techniques, electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Reach and Grasp

Brief summary

The whole body's voluntary movements are controlled by the brain. One of the brain areas most involved in controlling these voluntary movements is the motor cortex and it is often viewed as the primary 'output' region of the neocortex. Motor cortical activity in the beta frequency range (13-30Hz) is a hallmark signature of healthy and pathological movement, but its behavioral relevance remains unclear. Such uncertainty confounds the development of treatments for diseases of movement which are associated with pathophysiological beta activity, including Parkinson's, therefore furthering understanding on the behavioral significance of activity in this range is now vital. Recently, it has become apparent that oscillatory beta activity actually occurs in discrete transient bursts, and that the summation of short-lasting, high-powered bursts of activity only appear to be sustained oscillations when averaged over multiple trials. In this study we will use neurophysiological and neuroimaging techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All of these techniques have been identified as non-invasive techniques. By applying these methods, we will be able to analyze beta burst activity in order to determine how beta bursts influence naturalistic motor behavior. This project also encompasses the study of auditory and motor interactions doing an experimental task. The aim of the project is to get a better understanding of the role of motor-related beta activity during the preparation and generation of reach and grasp actions. These findings may inform novel treatments for pathophysiological disorders characterized by aberrant beta signaling, utilizing causal manipulation of the neural circuits implicated in the generation of beta activity. This project also has expected methodological repercussions. It will make it possible to validate the use of individualized head-casts worn during MEG acquisition for the study of the cortical control of naturalistic actions, and to create new analysis tools that allow an increase in the spatial resolution of MEG data.

Interventions

OTHERReach and grasp tasks in healthy participants using MEG technique (Experiment 1)

Human participants will perform reach and grasp movements to various objects (e.g. a cube, sphere, or rod) driven either by perceived action affordances, or instruction cues. A rotating carousel will be used to present subjects with various objects affording different types of grasps (e.g. a precision pinch, a whole hand 'power' grasp, or a tripod grasp). Prior to the experiment, subjects will be tested outside the scanner by asking them to grasp each object as they would naturally to ensure that each object elicits the expected grasp type. Subject-specific, 3D-printed head-casts will be created based on high resolution MRI scans from each subject, and worn by subjects during the MEG experiment (Experiment 1) to reduce within-session head movement associated with reaching and grasping. At the end of this session an experimental task is added: detection of tons in presence of multitonal masks, in order to verify how beta peaks might be generated by a stimulus auditory.

OTHERReach and grasp tasks in healthy participants using EEG technique (Experiment 2)

Experiment 2 consists of a task of reaching for and grasping several objects (e.g. a cube, sphere, or rod) ; the task used for experiment 2 is the same as that used for experiment 1. EEG signals will be measured.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For all experiments : * Healthy male or female * Aged 18-40 years * Registered with the French healthcare system * Motivated to participate in the study * Normal or corrected vision * Right-handed * Adequate knowledge of French to be able to follow directions * Subjects must have the minimal motor ability necessary to participate in the experiment * Subjects must be able to listen and understand the study instructions * Subjects must be able to give written informed consent before participation * Normal hearing

Exclusion criteria

For all experiments : Subjects with characteristics incompatible with MEG/EEG and MRI : * Claustrophobia * Psychiatric pathology characterized including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis (MS), or severe traumatic brain injury * Neuropsychological disorders or cognitive impairment including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, seizures, epilepsy, sleep disorders * Regular use of neurodevelopment medicines (antidepressants, neuroleptics) * Subject has a history of skin disease or skin allergies (multiple or severe) * Subject working with metals in their professional lives * The subject had an MRI 2 weeks prior to experiment 1 * Implanted material (any dental apparatus containing metal including or root canals or any metallic object, pacemaker, cochlear implanted in the body) * Pregnant women or lactating women (based on self-report) * subjects who are not able to tolerate sitting for 1 hour (the estimated length of the experiment) * Alcohol dependence * Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator are not able or willing to comply with the protocol For experiment 1: \- A head size incompatible with the use of a personalized 3D head-cast or a magnetoencephalography

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timing of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsTiming (ms, relative to motion onset) of beta bursts in motor cortex with MEGthan the one planned is cued and must be performed.
Spatial location of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsSpatial location (mm, in a brain-centered reference frame) of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG
Timing of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsTiming (ms, relative to motion onset) of beta bursts in motor cortex with EEG
Spatial location of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsSpatial location (mm, in a brain-centered reference frame) of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beta amplitude, measured with MEGThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsBeta amplitude (fT) in motor cortex, measured with MEG
Beta amplitude, measured with EEGThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsBeta amplitude (μV) in motor cortex, measured with EEG
Determine what aspects of grasp kinematics can be decoded from beta burst activity in motor cortex and related regions.The data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 years.Multivariate machine learning models which are able to predict the trajectory of arm and hand kinematics from the spatiotemporal pattern of beta bursts in motor cortex.
Timing of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsTiming (ms, relative to motion onset) of beta bursts in motor cortex with MEG
Visual stimuliThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 years.Comparison of synchronization, localization and waveform of beta peaks in the motor cortex in response ovisual stimuli.
Auditory stimuliThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 years.Comparison of synchronization, localization and waveform of beta peaks in the motor cortex in response to auditory stimuli.
Within-session movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 years.Movement (mm) of fiducial locations of the head-cast relative to the MEG sensors
Spatial location of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsSpatial location (mm, in a brain-centered reference frame) of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with MEG
Timing of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsTiming (ms, relative to motion onset) of beta bursts in motor cortex with EEG
Spatial location of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG before initiation of a movementThe data of subjects will be collected and analyzed through study completion an average of 2 yearsSpatial location (mm, in a brain-centered reference frame) of beta bursts in motor cortex, measured with EEG

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026