Patient Satisfaction Using Implant Retained Overdentures
Conditions
Keywords
patient satisfaction,implant-retained overdenture,complete denture
Brief summary
Purpose: This study aimed to compare patients' satisfaction with mandibular overdentures retained by three-splinted implants and conventional complete dentures during a seven-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Thirty edentulous male patients (mean age: 60 years) were carefully selected and divided into two equal groups. All patients received a new set of complete dentures. (Group I) patients received three implants in the anterior mandible and were connected after three months with bars, clips and loaded. (Group II) patients' received conventional complete dentures. Patients' satisfaction was recorded for both groups at three weeks (baseline) and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years. Patients were then asked to grade their overdentures/dentures on a visual analog scale and written questionnaire to evaluate their overall satisfaction. Results: satisfaction scores of Group I patients was found to be statistically significantly higher than that of Group II patients (p \< .05) at 3, 5 and 7 years follow-up, meanwhile no statistically significant difference was found at baseline or after 12 months. Conclusions: The long-term results suggest that three implants-retained mandibular overdenture with a clip-bar attachment appears to be a successful rehabilitation strategy which is superior to conventional dentures for patients with advanced ridge resorption.
Interventions
OTHERPatient Satisfaction
Patients were then asked to grade their overdentures/dentures on a visual analog scale and written questionnaire to evaluate their overall satisfaction.
Sponsors
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
58 Years to 62 Years
Inclusion criteria
* The inclusion criteria stipulated that patients must have been wearing dentures on a regular basis, have been edentulous for a minimum of 3-years, and are capable of reading and writing.
Exclusion criteria
* insufficient bone volume to install three 13mm. interforaminal implants (Group I), insufficient interarch space. Patients with diabetes, osteoporosis, smokers, psychological problems of removable denture acceptance, gag reflex, absence of a maxillary complete denture and medical or physical considerations that would seriously affect the surgical procedure (Group I) or the follow-up period were also excluded
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction | Seven years | Patients were then asked to grade their overdentures/dentures on a visual analog scale and written questionnaire to evaluate their overall satisfaction. |
Outcome results
None listed