Skip to content

Sensory Responses to Dorsal Root Stimulation

Sensory Responses to Dorsal Root Stimulation

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04725006
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-01-26
Start date
2020-12-16
Completion date
2025-10-07
Last updated
2025-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Sensation, Phantom

Keywords

spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglia stimulation, sensation, amputation, pain

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to characterize the types of sensations that can be evoked via electrical stimulation of the spinal cord and spinal nerves. Patients will be recruited from a local pain clinic, each with a spinal cord stimulation device implanted, to participate in experiments to explore the ability to modulate and control the modality, intensity, focality, and location of the sensations evoked by stimulation through the spinal cord stimulator leads. Investigators will connect spinal cord stimulator leads to a custom stimulator system and will ask subjects to report the types of sensations felt. Invesigators will also perform detailed psychophysical metrics to examine participants' ability to discriminate sensations.

Detailed description

For this study, investigators aim to determine whether DRG and spinal root stimulation might be viable techniques for restoring feedback. Investigators will focus on patients undergoing temporary percutaneous trials of DRG or lateral spinal cord stimulation with leads manufactured by either Boston Scientific (under PMA P030017) or St. Jude (under PMA P150004), which have FDA premarket approval for the management of chronic pain in the trunk and lower limbs. In this early experiment, investigators will not focus on individuals with limb loss, but rather will include patients already undergoing a percutaneous trial of DRG or spinal root stimulation to treat pain. Investigators will characterize the location, modality, and intensity of sensations evoked in the hands or feet with stimulation delivered by an external stimulator.

Interventions

These systems are indicated as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs, including unilateral or bilateral pain associated with the following: failed back surgery syndrome, intractable low back pain and leg pain. Stimulation will be applied to the system using an external stimulator to see if sensations can be evoked in the participant's limb/foot.

Sponsors

Lee Fisher, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must be between the ages of 18 and 70 years old. 2. Subjects must be undergoing an epidural spinal cord implanted electrode array clinical trial with Dr. Helm for the management of pain. 3. Persons must understand the consent and the procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Persons with open wounds; 2. Persons with implanted metal rods in the spine or limbs; 3. Persons with defibrillator or pacemaker; 4. Persons with permanent skin metal tags or decorations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Location of evoked sensory perceptsup to 2 daysDocument where on the body the subject perceives the stimulation locations.
Stimulation perceptual thresholds to stimulus parametersup to 2 daysQuantify the threshold stimulus required to evoke sensory percepts during epidural spinal nerve stimulation.
Stimulation neurophysiology thresholds to stimulus parametersup to 2 daysQuantify the threshold stimulus required to evoke neurophysiological responses during epidural spinal nerve stimulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative self-report of evoked sensationsup to 2 daysDocument the subjective perception of lumbosacral epidural spinal nerve stimulation for restoration of sensation. The investigators will ask each subject to provide subjective feedback on their perceived utility of the sensory feedback provided by the device.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026