Skip to content

AssessMent and Counseling to Get the Best Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Assistive TeCHnology

Http://Talionis.Citic.Udc.es

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04723784
Acronym
MATCH
Enrollment
24
Registered
2021-01-26
Start date
2020-07-15
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2023-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disability Physical, Disability, Learning, Disabling Disease

Keywords

Assistive technology, outcome measures, robotics, Artificial Inteligence

Brief summary

The best match between any person with disability and the assistive technology (AT) only can be gotten through a complete assessment and a monitoring of the needs, abilities, priorities, difficult and limitations that he/she finds in his/her life. Without this analysis, may be the risk that the AT doesn't adapt to the expectation of the person. Like this, the user, in few time, could abandon the AT device, with the unnecessary spends of resources. Therefore, is important that any project focused in the development of new innovating AT for people with disabilities includes the perspective of outcome measures as an important phase of the research. In this sense, the incorporation of the assessment, implementation process and outcome measures is vital to get the transferability during the whole project and to get the general perspective from the final user. The protocol presents a project that aims to improve the independence, participation and functional mobility of people with disabilities. The sample is formed by people with disabilities that will participate from the first stage of the process, with an initial assessment of their abilities and needs, a complete implication during the test of technology, and in the final application of outcome measures instruments. Only with this perspective and active participation of the users is possible to carry on a user-centered approach. That fact will allow to define and to generate technological solutions that really adjust to the expectations, needs and priorities of the people with disabilities, avoiding that the AT be abandoned, with the consequent health and social spending.

Detailed description

The present document is the description of a Subproject of a global and complete coordinated Project, in which are participants the University of A Coruña, the University of Alcalá de Henares and the University of Sevilla, and its title is Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Assistive Technology devices for Disabled People (AIR4DP). The main result of the AIR4DP project consists of the implementation of assistive technology that allows to incorporate the latest advances in Artificial Intelligence to improve life quality of people with disabilities. With this target, the investigators present a coordinated project that is divided into three sub-projects, whose main goals consist of developing and evaluating the breakthrough of the proposed technology in people with functional diversity. In this Study Protocol, the justification and the development of subproject MATCH are explained. It will be coordinated by the University of A Coruña, and its performance implies the participation of people with disabilities. Therefore, this project is focused on the implementation of outcome measurement tools to improve the efficacy, effectiveness and real utility of the assistive technology devices (ATD) developed. On the other hand, it is also very important to assess the functional impact the ATD has on the user's participation in their social environment. For that, other measurement tools to assess functional mobility outcomes will also be also carried out during basal assessment and after 6 months of ATD implementation. For this study protocol, the hypothesis is related to the relevance of the assessment of the interaction between the users and the AT: in order to guarantee a high match person-AT, to also get a positive psychosocial impact in the life of people with disabilities, the assessment and monitoring result two fundamental aspects. According to this hypothesis, the research groups has fixed two main objectives for the MATCH subproject: * To determine the psychosocial impact of AT created during the coordinated project (AIR4ALL) on the life of people with disabilities. * To promote the best match between the user and the assistive technology used. To complete, few secondary goals have been proposed: * To assess the functional skills and abilities of people with disabilities, and to identify their needs to get independence in mobility and activities of daily living. * To design and create the best technology solutions individualized for each person, meeting with the design for all principles, and promoting the involvement of the final user. * To validate the assistive technology's solutions designed and prototyped in order to increase the levels of participation in daily activities to people with disabilities. * To validate a protocol/model of outcome measures in the field of assistive technology to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of selecting and prescribing these products.

Interventions

In this phase the evaluation of the participants will be done, with the application of the instrument presented in outcome measures' section. According to the age of the person, specific questionnaires will be used to gather information more concrete about the skills for mobility. This assessment will allow determining the specific needs, demands and capabilities of participants. The assessment process will be done by professionals of research groups in rooms of collaborators centers.

OTHERImplementation of assistive technology in the daily life of participants

The professionals of collaborator centers, supported by the research groups, will carry on the training in the use of AT by the participants, facilitating its incorporation during the performance of activities of daily living.

OTHERApplication of outcome measures

After the process of implementation of AT (the next 2 and 6 months), members of the research group and the professionals of collaborators centers will apply the measurement instruments to determine the possible improvements in the level of functional independence (FIM scale) of people with disabilities, the impact that the AT has had on their lifes (PIADS scale) and the level of matching between person and AT (ATD PA - MPT model).

Sponsors

University of Alcala
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Seville
CollaboratorOTHER
Universidade da Coruña
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Months to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* People with recognized disability, derived by a disease or a permanent health status. * Age between 2 and 21 years old. * To form part of any of the collaborators' centers with the three universities. * To have an independent functional level moderate - low (assessed by the Functional Independence Measure. * To have functional skills - mobility domain level moderate - low (assessed by the Spanish version of Pediatric of Disability Inventory - PEDI)

Exclusion criteria

* To have any health status that is incompatible with the use of assistive technology designed and prototyped in the project. * To have cognitive skills very limited, that limits to follow the instructions to good use of AT. * Not to have adequate human supports to make use of AT. * To have functional skills - mobility domain level low (assessed by the Spanish version of Pediatric of Disability Inventory - PEDI), with the need for maximum assistance from caregivers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Psychosocial Impact of the assistive technology in the life of people with disabilityTwo months after the implementation phasePsychosocial impact of assistive technology scale (PIADS): This scale has three dimensions: competence, adaptability and Self-steem. Each of these dimensions can have a minimum value of -3 up to a maximum value of +3. Higher scores mean a better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of matching between person and technologyTwo months after the implementation phaseAssistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment (ATD PA) - Device form
Level of Independence in the performance for activities of daily living.Two months after the implementation phaseFunctional Independence Measure (FIM). The lowest score of the scale is 18, the highest score is 126.
Level of Independence in the performance for activities of daily livingSix months after the implementation phaseFunctional Independence Measure (FIM): The lowest score of the scale is 18, the highest score is 126.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Personal mobility: Capacity to stand up and start the walkTwo months after the implementation phaseTest up & go
Personal mobility and walking during a 10-meter journeyTwo months after the implementation phase10 meter walk test: The outcome of this measure is the time it takes the person to walk 10 meters
Personal mobility and walking during a 10-meter journey.Two and six months after the implementation phase10 meter walk test. The outcome of this measure is the time it takes the person to walk 10 meters
Personal mobility and walking during a 6 minutes walking.Two months after the implementation phase6 minute walk Test; The outocme of this test is the distance traveled during 6 minutes.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026