Skip to content

Computer Aided Diagnosis of Multiple Eye Fundus Diseases From Color Fundus Photograph

A Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Reading, Self Controlled, Superiority Priority Clinical Trial of Assisted Fundus Image Diagnosis Software for the Diagnosis of Multiple Eye Fundus Diseases

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04723160
Enrollment
748
Registered
2021-01-25
Start date
2020-08-10
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2021-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, Diabetic Retinopathy, Epiretinal Membrane, Exudative Age Related Macular Degeneration, Macular Holes, Nonexudative Age-related Macular Degeneration, Optic Atrophy, Pathologic Myopia, Retinal Artery Occlusion, Retinal Detachment, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Suspect Glaucoma

Keywords

multiple eye fundus diseases

Brief summary

Blindness can be caused by many ocular diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, pathologic myopia and glaucoma. Without timely diagnosis and adequate medical intervention, the visual impairment can become a great burden on individuals as well as the society. It is estimated that China has 110 million patients under the attack of diabetes, 180 million patients with hypertension, 120 million patients suffering from high myopia and 200 million people over 60 years old, which suggest a huge population at the risk of blindness. Despite of this crisis in public health, our society has no more than 3,000 ophthalmologists majoring in fundus oculi disease currently. As most of them assembling in metropolitan cities, health system in this field is frail in primary hospitals. Owing to this unreasonable distribution of medical resources, providing medical service to hundreds of millions of potential patients threatened with blindness is almost impossible. To solve this problem, this software (MCS) was developed as a computer-aided diagnosis to help junior ophthalmologists to detect 13 major retina diseases from color fundus photographs. This study has been designed to validate the safety and efficiency of this device.

Detailed description

As a prospective clinical trial, This study enjoys multicentric, blind film reading, self-control and superiority test design. In total, 1,500 retinal fundus images from 750 individuals in need of fundus examination (one image for every single eye) were selected. Then a test group, along with a control group was set up in our study. For the test group, ophthalmologists read images with the aid of the assistant software(MCS). In contrast, the same work in the control group was finished by ophthalmologists independently. Meanwhile, the gold standard were obtained from the cooperation of senior ophthalmologists. Diagnoses of both groups were compared with those of the gold standard, thus the investigators could evaluated the safety and effectiveness of this assistant software in diagnosis. The primary endpoint of this study is the superiority of the consistency rate of the test group. A diagnosis for an image is consistent if it gives the same negative result as the reference standard, or reveals any one condition indicated by the reference standard. The consistency rate is the rate of consistent diagnoses for all the involved images. One control group is designed, where each doctor reads and diagnoses, and give at most 3 possible conditions for each image. In the test group, doctors do the same thing with the help of this software. The investigators in the test group and control group are the same and they are chosen from ophthalmologists with 1\ 3 years experience. The reference standard of each fundus image is collaboratively given by retinal specialists/fellows from 5 centers. The investigator of XieHe center is the arbitrator if full consensus cannot be reached for any image during the building of reference standard.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSoftware assisted imaging diagnosis

In the test group, diagnoses are given with the help of the software.

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission
CollaboratorOTHER
Visionary Intelligence Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 75. * Anyone need to take fundus photograph in clinical. * Understand the study and volunteer to sign the informed consent. * For fundus images of participants, the optic disc, fovea, the upper and lower vessel bow should be included in the fundus field.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants has any eye that cannot take fundus photos. * Participants have joined or is participating in other clinical trial within one month. * Participants who have any other issue that cannot be enrolled. * Participants with cloudy refractive media that cannot take fundus photos or get clouding fundus photos. * Participants with low quality fundus photos like incompetent vision field, overexposed/underexposed, out of focus, too many shadow or dirties and so on.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
consistent rate of diagnosesthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearFormula for calculation: consistent rate of diagnoses=number of images with consistent diagnosis/ total number of images × 100%. Method: the diagnoses from the test group and the control group were compared with diagnoses from the gold standard. For each image, if one or more diagnoses were consistent with those of the gold standard, which means at least one label existed in the intersection of diagnoses from the test group(or the control group)and those from the gold standard, it would be classified as image with consistent diagnosis. Otherwise, it would be classified as image without consistent diagnosis. After above-mentioned steps, the investigators had obtained the number of images with consistent diagnosis in each group. As images with 1-2 labels account for the majority in actual work, the investigators stipulated that each image in both groups could be marked with 3 labels at most in case of invalid improvement in consistent rate owing to multiple selections.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sensitivity and specificity of software's diagnoses for each diseasesthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearsensitivity and specificity of software's diagnoses for each diseases
PPV and NPV of software's diagnoses for each diseasesthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPPV(Positive Predictive Value) and NPV(Negative Predictive Value) of software's diagnoses for each diseases
full coincidence rate of software's diagnosesthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe full consistency rate is the rate of fully consistent diagnoses in the set. A diagnosis is fully consistent it is exactly the same as the reference standard.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026