Skip to content

Zemedy Application for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Zemedy - Evaluation of Zemedy, a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based Digital Therapeutic Application for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04723056
Enrollment
21
Registered
2021-01-25
Start date
2021-10-15
Completion date
2024-03-08
Last updated
2025-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Self Help

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is investigate the effectiveness of Zemedy, a mobile application that enables the digital delivery of a CBT program to people with IBS.

Detailed description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is defined as having recurrent abdominal pain associated with defecation or a change of bowel habits. The pathophysiology of IBS can be looked through the biopsychosocial model of disease which is defined by the complex interplay between genetic, cultural, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Treatment of IBS is multifaceted and ranges from exercise to dietary restrictions, however, psychological treatments to target the gut-brain axis such as cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) have also been shown to be an effective therapy, and aims to address the psychological and environmental stressors that contribute to the symptoms. Therefore the purpose of the study is investigate the effectiveness of Zemedy, a mobile application that enables the digital delivery of a CBT program to people with IBS. CBT has been shown to reduce the severity of intractable IBS symptoms by as much as 70%. The investigators hope to learn whether the Zemedy mobile application is effective in the reduction of IBS. This will be measured based on their IBS Symptom Severity Scores (SSS) at week 8 compared to baseline.

Interventions

DEVICEUse of Zemedy Application

8 weeks of CBT via the Zemedy Application.

Sponsors

Bold Health Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized trial comparing Zemedy CBT app vs. Treatment as usual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female patients \>=18 years old. 2. Meet Rome IV criteria for IBS for at least 6 months. No restrictions on type of IBS. 3. English proficiency (in order to understand use of the application. 4. Patient must be on a stable regimen for IBS for at least 30 days. 5. Patients must own a smartphone (iOS or Android) in order to participate in the CBT application.

Exclusion criteria

1. Laboratory or imaging evidence of an alternative explanation of patient's symptoms. 2. Active gastrointestinal disease such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, history of complete colon resection, acute infection, or any disease that precludes participation in CBT application. 3. Patient already undergoing cognitive behavioral therapy. 4. Psychiatric hospitalization within 10 years. 5. Current or past diagnosis of a major mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or substance abuse. 6. Active (within the past 3 months) suicidal ideation. 7. Prisoners or other detained individuals. 8. Adults unable to consent. 9. Pregnant people.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IBS-SSS at 8 WeeksBaseline and at Week 8.Change in IBS symptoms based on the change in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) score at week 8 compared to baseline. Score range: 0-500. Higher score corresponds to more severe symptoms (75-175 = mild, 176-300 - moderate; \>300 = severe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreBaseline, week 8 and week 24Assesses mood measured by the total distress score (score range: 0 to 21; \<7 normal, 8-14 borderline, 15 or \>15, abnormal).
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreBaseline, week 8 and week 24Assesses mood measured by the total distress score (score range: 0 to 21; \<7 normal, 8-14 borderline, 15 or \>15, abnormal)
Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)baseline, 24 weeksMeasures degree situation's in one's life are seen as stressful (score range: 0 to 40; 0-13 = low stress, 14-26 = moderate stress, 27-40 = high stress)
IBS-SSS at 24 WeeksBaseline and at Week 24Change in IBS symptoms based on the change in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) score at week 24 compared to baseline. Score range: 0-500. Higher score corresponds to more severe symptoms (75-175 = mild, 176-300 - moderate; \>300 = severe).
Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)Baseline, Week 24Assesses global symptoms relief asking the question, Overall, how do you feel?. Score range: -2 (no pain) to +2 (severe pain/discomfort).
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireBaseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeksAssesses work productivity based on percentage of work days taken off due to health
Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBS24 months
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)Baseline, week 24Measures the effect of IBS on ability to work and manage at home, participate in social and private leisure activities and maintain relationships. Score range: 0 to 40 (\<10 subclinical/mild, 10-20 significant, \>20 severe).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

21 participants signed informed consent; 18 were randomized to a study arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)
Participants who are in the Experimental Group will receive 8 weeks of CBT from the Zemedy mobile application in addition to their treatment as usual (TAU).
9
Control Group (TAU Only)
Treatment as Usual (TAU) for IBS patients are tailored to each individual's needs and may involve treatment such as: dietary modification, exercise, medication, and anti-diarrheal therapy.
9
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental (TAU Plus CBT)Control Group (TAU Only)Total
Age, Continuous36 years34 years35.5 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 90 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

IBS-SSS at 8 Weeks

Change in IBS symptoms based on the change in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) score at week 8 compared to baseline. Score range: 0-500. Higher score corresponds to more severe symptoms (75-175 = mild, 176-300 - moderate; \>300 = severe).

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 8.

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)IBS-SSS at 8 WeeksWeek 8126 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)IBS-SSS at 8 WeeksBaseline215 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)IBS-SSS at 8 WeeksBaseline171 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)IBS-SSS at 8 WeeksWeek 8143.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 8p-value: 0.282t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)

Measures degree situation's in one's life are seen as stressful (score range: 0 to 40; 0-13 = low stress, 14-26 = moderate stress, 27-40 = high stress)

Time frame: baseline, 24 weeks

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)Baseline32 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)Week 2429 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)Baseline21 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Cohen Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)Week 2422 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.181t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Score

Assesses mood measured by the total distress score (score range: 0 to 21; \<7 normal, 8-14 borderline, 15 or \>15, abnormal)

Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 24

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreBaseline10 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreWeek 248 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreWeek 89 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreBaseline7 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreWeek 88 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety ScoreWeek 246.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 8p-value: 0.573t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.606t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Score

Assesses mood measured by the total distress score (score range: 0 to 21; \<7 normal, 8-14 borderline, 15 or \>15, abnormal).

Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 24

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreBaseline6 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreWeek 87 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreWeek 245 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreBaseline2 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreWeek 85 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression ScoreWeek 241.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 8p-value: 0.462t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.179t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

IBS-SSS at 24 Weeks

Change in IBS symptoms based on the change in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) score at week 24 compared to baseline. Score range: 0-500. Higher score corresponds to more severe symptoms (75-175 = mild, 176-300 - moderate; \>300 = severe).

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)IBS-SSS at 24 WeeksBaseline215 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)IBS-SSS at 24 WeeksWeek 24134 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)IBS-SSS at 24 WeeksBaseline171 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)IBS-SSS at 24 WeeksWeek 24143.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.217t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBS

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSUrgent care0 Participants
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSEmergency Department1 Participants
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSPhysician appointment0 Participants
Control Group (TAU Only)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSUrgent care0 Participants
Control Group (TAU Only)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSEmergency Department0 Participants
Control Group (TAU Only)Number of Participants Who Had an Urgent Care, Emergency Department, or Physician Appointment Due to IBSPhysician appointment0 Participants
Secondary

Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)

Assesses global symptoms relief asking the question, Overall, how do you feel?. Score range: -2 (no pain) to +2 (severe pain/discomfort).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)Baseline0 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)Week 240 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)Baseline1 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Subject's Global Assessment of Relief (SGA)Week 241.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.643t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

Measures the effect of IBS on ability to work and manage at home, participate in social and private leisure activities and maintain relationships. Score range: 0 to 40 (\<10 subclinical/mild, 10-20 significant, \>20 severe).

Time frame: Baseline, week 24

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)Baseline14 score on a scale
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)Week 249 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)Baseline13 score on a scale
Control Group (TAU Only)Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)Week 2414.5 score on a scale
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.407t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire

Assesses work productivity based on percentage of work days taken off due to health

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireWeek 82.6 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 4.1
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireWeek 241.4 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 1.8
Experimental (TAU Plus CBT)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireBaseline9.59 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 6.06
Control Group (TAU Only)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireWeek 81.5 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 3.3
Control Group (TAU Only)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireBaseline3.57 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 4.65
Control Group (TAU Only)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) QuestionnaireWeek 240.96 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 8p-value: 0.625t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Between-group analysis at week 24p-value: 0.707t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026