Skip to content

Experimental Study Measuring Power and Execution Speed in 44 Athletes in Push-up Exercise.

Measuring Velocity and Power on Unstable Push-up: Differences Between Trained and Untrained Population.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04721496
Enrollment
44
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
2019-11-12
Completion date
2019-12-12
Last updated
2021-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Power

Keywords

Core, Unstable Devices, Suspension Training, Resistance Training, Strength

Brief summary

Investigation of power and speed in relation to the increasing instability in a group of untrained athletes and a group of expert athletes. In this way, the effectiveness of unstable training for different types of athletes can be tested. Our hypothesis is that as instability increases there is a gradual decrease in power and speed of execution, but not too relevant in the expert group.

Detailed description

Introduction Strength training using devices that induce varying degrees of instability is widely practiced in numerous contexts and has been credited with benefits in prevention, rehabilitation and general health. Several studies have found a progressive decrease in power as the degree of instability increases. However, it is not known how mildly unstable situations are affected, nor are the differences between trained and untrained subjects. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of different degrees of instability on power and speed of execution in a push-up or arm-bottoms exercise, in trained and untrained subjects. Method Maximum power (MP) and mean power (BP), and maximum speed (MV) and mean propulsive speed (VA) of push-up were analyzed in 44 subjects, 24 untrained (176.38±5.35 cm, 76.38±6.85 kg, 2.5±1.5 months experience) and 20 trained (178.45±5.91 cm, 83.4±21.56 kg, 15.5±5.3 months experience), under six conditions of increasing instability: 1) stable, 2) device in suspension: rings, 3) monopodal, 4) device in suspension: TRX®, 5) with hands-on Bosu® and 6) with hands-on TRX® and feet on Bosu®.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPower and Speed

Analysis of the power and speed of execution in 6 conditions of increasing instability Situation 1 is stable and basic execution. Condition 6 is the most unstable. The participants performed 2 series of 3 repetitions in each of the situations. All the exercises were executed on the same day.

Sponsors

Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 2 years of continuous strength training * No injuries of any kind within the last year * Perform a regular push-up exercise * Having ever used an unstable device

Exclusion criteria

* Previous injuries * Never have used unstable devices * Newcomers to strength training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Power1 monthAnalysis of the power exercised in the execution of each exercise It was measured with a linear encoder.
Execution Speed1 monthAnalysis of the speed exercised in the execution of each exercise It was measured with a linear encoder.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026