Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of IBI310 Combined With Sintilimab Versus Sorafenib in the First-line Treatment of Advanced HCC

A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Study to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of IBI310 Combined With Sintilimab Versus Sorafenib in the First-line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04720716
Enrollment
344
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
2021-02-07
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter Phase III study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IBI310 combined with sintilimab and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC who have not previously received systemic therapy, are unsuitable for radical surgical resection or local treatment, or have had progressive disease after surgical resection or local treatment.

Interventions

DRUGIBI310

IBI310 IV d1, Q6W

DRUGSintilimab

sintilimab IV d1, Q3W

DRUGSorafenib

Sorafenib 400mg po

Sponsors

Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically/cytologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver cirrhosis meeting the clinical diagnostic criteria; 2. ECOG performance status score of 0 or 1 point; 3. No systemic antitumor treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma before the first administration; 4. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, or Stage B not suitable for radical surgery and/or local treatment; 5. At least 1 measurable lesion according to RECIST V1.1); 6. Child-Pugh:≤6 7. Adequate organ and bone marrow function.

Exclusion criteria

1. With fibrous lamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma components in tumor tissues. 2. Have a history of hepatic encephalopathy or have a history of liver transplantation. 3. With clinical symptoms requires drainage of pleural effusion, ascites or pericardial effusion. 4. Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. 5. Uncontrolled high blood pressure, systolic blood pressure \>140mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>90mmHg after optimal medical treatment. 6. Local treatment for liver lesions within 4 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective response rate (ORR)up to 24 months after randomizationObjective response rate (ORR) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC
Overall survival (OS)up to 24 months after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of response(DOR)up to 24 months after randomizationDuration of response(DOR) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC and investigator
Disease control rate(DCR)up to 24 months after randomizationDisease control rate(DCR) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC and investigator
Time to progression(TTP)up to 24 months after randomizationTime to progression(TTP) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC and investigator
The incidence and severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Eventsup to 24 months after randomization
Time to response(TTR)up to 24 months after randomizationTime to response(TTR) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC and investigator
Progression-free survival (PFS)up to 24 months after randomizationProgression-free survival (PFS) in two arms based on RECIST V1.1 by the IRRC and investigator

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026