Perioperative Complication
Conditions
Keywords
postoperative complications, intraoperative monitoring, haemodynamic monitoring, laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Brief summary
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) with hemodynamic monitoring may not be of benefit to all elective patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly those managed in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols (ERAS) setting.
Detailed description
Our study compared two groups of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a control group (CG) in which standard haemodynamic monitoring was used, and a study group (SG) in which extended haemodynamic monitoring was applied with appropriate intraoperative interventions. Differences in intraoperative fluid management, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity were observed.
Interventions
In case of stroke volume variation (SVV) \>10% and SI and CI \>10% below the starting value, fluid challenge was performed with approximately 2 ml/kg of colloid over maximum of 5 minutes. The response was monitored. If there was a fall in SVV and an increase in SI of \>10% and the SVV still \>10%, the second fluid challenge was performed. If there was still a reduction in SVV after the second fluid challenge, but an increase in nSI \<10% and decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), no additional fluids were given. Vasoactive drugs were used instead.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients, undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with cardiac arrhythmias
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Duration of hospitalisation | 1 month after admission |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Perioperative complications | 8 days after surgery |
Countries
Slovenia