Skip to content

DilAtation Versus Endoscopic Laser Resection in Simple Benign trAcheal sTEnosis

Dilatation Versus Endoscopic Laser Resection in Simple Benign Tracheal Stenosis : a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04719845
Acronym
AERATE
Enrollment
108
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
2021-03-17
Completion date
2022-11-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tracheal Stenosis

Brief summary

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic laser resection vs dilatation in benign tracheal stenosis.

Detailed description

An observational study suggests the superiority of endoscopic laser resection over dilatation in idiopathic tracheal stenosis but little litterature has been published on the subject. Hence we decided to design a prospective multicenter open label randomized controlled trial to compare the two interventions. Patients refered for endoscopic treatment of a simple benign tracheal stenosis will be randomized to endoscopic laser resection or dilatation. Randomisation will be stratified for center, type of stenosis (idiopathic vs other) and history of previous endoscopic treatment. Patients will be blinded to treatment but not physician. All patients will be treated with proton pump inhibitors.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic laser resection

Laser resection

PROCEDUREDilatation

Dilatation

Sponsors

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Benign simple tracheal stenosis (length of stenosis \<1cm without underlying cartilage damage) with planned endoscopic treatment (first treatment or recurrence)

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years old * Pregnant * Incapacity to give informed consent * Underlying inflammatory suspected to be the cause of stenosis (ex : granulomatosis with polyangitis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Relapse rate at 2 years of symptomatic tracheal stenosis (> 40%) requiring a new procedureWithin 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relapse rate at 1 year of symptomatic tracheal stenosis (> 40%) requiring a new procedure1 year
Time to first symptomatic relapse of tracheal stenosis2 years
mMRC2 years
VAS2 years
Clinical COPD questionnaire2 years
VHI-102 years
SF-122 years
Measurement of stenosis by cephalo-caudal length at endoscopic follow-up at 1 yearWithin 2 years
Rate of surgical resection following symptomatic recurrence2 years
Rate and type of complications and adverse effects depending on the procedure2 years

Countries

Canada, France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMarc Fortin

Fondation IUCPQ

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026