Skip to content

Comparison of Core Strength Training Using Stable Versus Unstable Surfaces

Comparison of Core Strength Training Using Stable Versus Unstable Surfaces On Strength, Flexibility, Balance, Coordination and Speed in Gym Members

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04719676
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2020-12-30
Last updated
2021-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Core Strength Training, Flexibility, Balance, Coordination, Speed

Brief summary

This study will address the scarcity of research and the variations in recommendations regarding core strengthening and stability programs. As physical fitness is a major concern of individuals and mostly people refer gym for fitness enhancement, this study will thus provide a guideline for effective core strength training program

Detailed description

Male clients, aged 19 to 44 years, coming to the gym for strength training will be purposively selected based on the inclusion criteria and then randomly assigned into two groups. They will undergo a series of pre-intervention tests that would assess their strength using Bourbon TMS and standing long jump tests; flexibility using stand and reach test; balance using Y balance test; coordination using jumping sideways test and speed using 20-m sprint test. After initial assessment, they will be advised and demonstrated for curl-up, side-bridging and quadrupled exercises. The experimental group will perform these exercises on Thera-Band© Exercise Ball while the control group will perform the same exercises on gym floor. The clients will have sessions on preferably the first day and 4th day of the week but is subject to their attendance at the gym. There will be interval assessments at 2nd and 4th week based on the tests mentioned above to record changes at these intervals. After 6 weeks of bi-weekly sessions, the clients will undergo post-intervention tests that will be the same as pre-intervention tests.

Interventions

OTHERCore strength training using unstable surface

Training would include big 3 exercises as described by McGill. These include the curl-up, side bridge, and quadruped position on unstable surface

OTHERThe stable surface would be gym floor.

Training would include big 3 exercises as described by McGill. These include the curl-up, side bridge, and quadruped position on stable gym Floor

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
19 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male clients * Male adults with age 19-44 years * Regular gym attendance with at least two gym workout session per week

Exclusion criteria

* Recent history of injury or illness * Clients coming to gym for other exercises (endurance training, cardiovascular training)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bourbon TMS test (core strength)6 to 8 weeksThe Bourbon Trunk Muscle Strength(TMS) test is an economical measure for assessment of dorsal, ventral and lateral trunk muscle chains.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stand-and-reach test (flexibility)6 to 8 weeksIt is used for the measurement of spinal and pelvic flexibility. Excellent test-retest reliability has been reported for the stand-and-reach test with an ICC of 0.94.
20-m sprint test (speed)6 to 8 weeksMaximum effort sprints will be assessed from a stationary start to a distance of 20 meters to assess the speed of participant. Excellent test-retest reliability has been reported for the hand stopped 20-m sprint test with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.90 variable
Jumping Sideways Test6 to 8 weeksThe jumping sideways test evaluates motor coordination under time pressure. Excellent test-retest reliability has been reported for the jumping sideways test with an ICC of 0.89
Y Balance Test6 to 8 weeksThe lower quarter Y balance test is a dynamic test that requires subjects to maintain single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the contralateral leg in 3 different movement directions (i.e., anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral). Excellent test retest reliability has been reported for the Y balance test in all 3 movement directions with ICC values ranging between 0.89 and 0.93.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026