Skip to content

Repair of Groin Hernias After Abdominal Prostatectomy With Robotic TAPP

Lichtenstein or Robotic TAPP Repair of Groin Hernias After Abdominal Prostatectomy: a Single Centre Retrospective Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04718597
Acronym
RAPrTAPP
Enrollment
43
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2020-12-01
Last updated
2021-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Brief summary

This retrospective study investigates if robotic assisted groin hernia repair in patients who previously underwent abdominal prostatectomy has an equal or more favorable clinical outcome, compared to open repair in those patients.

Detailed description

In the personal practice of the investigators, there has been a decrease in open groin hernia repair from 17% to 6% since the introduction of robotic assisted surgery. This reflects a change in indication for complex hernias from an open to a minimal invasive approach. One of the typical indications for open approach before adopting the robotic platform were groin hernias after previous abdominal prostatectomy. Since prostatectomy results in scarring of the retropubic area where we need to dissect during MIS groin hernia repair, an open anterior approach is often suggested. With the enhanced view and instrument dexterity of the robotic platform, the investigators have now changed to a minimal invasive approach in these patients. Therefore, this study will evaluate the clinical outcome after robotic assisted repair of groin hernias in patients who previously underwent an abdominal prostatectomy in comparison to open groin hernia repair.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotic assisted inguinal hernia repair

Robotic assisted inguinal hernia repair with DaVinci Xi system instead of open repair

Classical approach (open repair)

Sponsors

Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients * Underwent uni-or bilateral groin hernia repair in the period March 2015 - March 2020 * Groin hernia repair via robotic assisted laparoscopy or open surgery * History of abdominal prostatectomy before the groin hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

* Age below 18 * Groin hernia repair via conventional laparoscopy * Groin hernia repair via open surgery other than Liechtenstein method * Groin hernia repair without mesh placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-hospital complicationsFrom admission until hospital discharge, on average 12-24 hoursComplications during hospital stay according to Clavien-Dindo
Operative time and per-operative complicationsDuring the hernia repair procedureSkin-to-skin operating time and complications during the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early complications at homeImmediately post hospital discharge until 1 month postoperativeComplications at 1 month follow-up (readmission, seroma, infection) according to Clavien-Dindo

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026