Skip to content

Evaluating the Use of 0.5 and 0.75 MAC Desflurane in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery

Evaluating the Use of Desflurane in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using 0.5 and 0.75 MAC Desflurane

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04717102
Enrollment
34
Registered
2021-01-20
Start date
2021-04-14
Completion date
2024-03-27
Last updated
2025-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

evoked potentials, spinal surgery, desflurane

Brief summary

Background: Somatosensory- (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are commonly used as an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring tool to detect aberrations to the spinal cord integrity during spinal surgery. Inhalational anaesthetic agents have a significant influence on evoked potentials by suppressing the amplitude and prolonging the latency. Evidences suggest that total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is superior to inhalation anaesthesia for neuromonitoring in spinal surgery, and support the use of up to 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anaesthetic agents in these procedures. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal surgeries will be prospectively recruited and be induced with TIVA at baseline of the evoked potentials. They will be randomized to receive balance anaesthesia with A) Desflurane MAC 0.5+remifentanil, or B) Desflurane MAC 0.75+remifentanil until the end of surgery. Influence of 1.0 MAC desflurane on the evoked potentials after the completion of surgery will also be studied. Desired Results: Endpoints include the changes to the amplitude and latency of SSEPs and MEPs with 0.5 and 0.75 MAC desflurane. The findings will indicate the safety of desflurane at the studied concentrations for spinal surgeries, and substantial savings with the use of desflurane instead of TIVA.

Detailed description

Recording of Evoked Potentials characteristics: The following characteristics of the evoked potential signals will be recorded: * Amplitude: Size of the response, measured in microvolts (μV) * Latency: Speed of the response, measured in milliseconds (ms) * Morphology: Appearance of the response - Simple/Complex wave shape Baseline evoked potentials will be recorded at various points of surgery. Anaesthesia variables: At the time of recording of evoked potentials: \- Intraoperative temperature, blood pressure, ETCO2, anaesthesia depth - bispectral index monitoring (BIS), remifentanil TCI, MAC of desflurane, Train of Four, volume of propofol and remifentanil until randomization, total volume of desflurane and remifentanil used, anaesthetic medications used, FiO2, SpO2 Patient characteristics: \- Age, gender, race, weight, BMI, medications used, haematocrit, preop blood glucose (for Diabetics) Safety considerations: 'Recommended standards for intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials', Guideline 11B of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2009) and 'Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring' will form the basis of the safety aspects of the study. Conduct of Anaesthesia: * The induction of anaesthesia will be achieved using targeted propofol and remifentanil infusions (TIVA). Muscle relaxants atracurium, rocuronium or suxamethonium will be used to facilitate intubation. * Anaesthesia will be maintained on TIVA until the patient has recovered from muscle relaxant. Baseline characteristics (BC1) of the evoked potentials in TIVA will be obtained at this stage. * Once the BC1 has been obtained, the patients will be randomized to two groups: Group A- Anaesthesia maintained with 0.5 MAC desflurane/remifentanil infusion Group B- Anaesthesia maintained with 0.75MAC desflurane/remifentanil infusion * Baseline characteristics 2 (BC2) will be obtained and the decision to proceed with 0.5 or 0.75 MAC desflurane made. * On completion of the neuromonitoring phase of surgery, as defined by completion of instrumentation and start of closure, all patients in Group A and B will be maintained with 1.0 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion. Baseline characteristics 3 (BC3) will be recorded at this stage. * The remifentanil infusion will be titrated at various stages of surgery to maintain a stable BIS and will also be based on haemodynamic variables. All patients will get additional analgesics and antiemetics as deemed necessary. Post-operative recovery will follow the standard industry norms.

Interventions

DRUG0.5 MAC desflurane

Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.5 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery.

DRUG0.75 MAC desflurane

Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.75 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery.

DRUG1.0 MAC desflurane

On completion of the neuromonitoring phase of surgery, the patients will be maintained on 1.0 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion.

Sponsors

Changi General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged ≥ 21 years old, scheduled for spinal surgery. * Patients who require SSEP/MEP and with no neurological deficits. * Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist I-III physical status. * Consenting patients. * Elective procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with sensory or motor deficits preoperatively. * Patients with significant cardiovascular and/or respiratory disease. * Emergency procedures. * Cord injury secondary to trauma. * Non-consenting patients. * Category A patients (Prisoners). * Patients with previous stroke. * Patients with Hep C, HIV.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)During surgeryMorphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)During surgeryMorphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)During surgeryAmplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)During surgeryLatency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)During surgeryAmplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)During surgeryLatency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)intraoperativeLatency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)intraoperativeMorphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)intraoperativeAmplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026