Skip to content

Conventional Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block and Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

Comparison of Conventional Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block and Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04712370
Enrollment
105
Registered
2021-01-15
Start date
2021-01-16
Completion date
2021-09-10
Last updated
2021-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conventional Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block, Pediatric Hip Surgery

Brief summary

This study will be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided erector spinae block , ultrasound guided caudal block and conventional caudal block for pain management after pediatric hip surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional caudal block

Patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal epidural space) by the conventional method (blind technique without ultrasound).

Using ultrasound, patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal epidural space).

Under ultrasound guidance, patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath) at the level of the transverse process of the second lumbar vertebrae(L2).

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both sex * ASA physical activity I, II * Age 4-12 years * Admitted for elective hip surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Parents refusal * Children with severe systemic disease * ASA III or IV * Children with previous neurological or spinal anomaly, coagulation disorders * History of premature birth * Infection at the block injection site * History of allergy to local anesthetics * Bilateral hip surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of pain intensityFirst 24 hours postoperativeTo evaluate the pain scores by (FLACC) scale. (FLACC) scale will be assessed after surgery over 24 hours where (0 = Relaxed and comfortable, 1-3 = Mild discomfort, 4-6 = Moderate pain ,7-10 = Severe discomfort /pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in heart rateIntraoperative and first 24 hours postoperativeHeart rate will be recorded before block performance at T0, intraoperatively at 15 and 30 minutes, then every 30 min till the end of surgery and after surgery at T (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h).
Amount of Analgesic required in the first day after surgeryFirst 24 hours postoperativeThe total dose of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen 15 mg/kg if FLACC scores between 2 and 4 at the first 24 h after surgery, and total dose of tramadol 1 mg/kg (IV) in case of FLACC score \> 4.
Time to first rescue analgesic demand after surgery.First 24 hours postoperativemeasured from the end of surgery till patient require analgesia.
Changes in mean arterial blood pressureIntraoperative and first 24 hours postoperativeMean arterial blood pressure will be recorded before block performance at T0, intraoperatively at 15 and 30 minutes, then every 30 min till the end of surgery and after surgery at T (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h).
Duration of performing the blockIntraoperative durationBlock performing time is defined as the period between the insertion of the needle and termination of local anesthetic administration
Incidence of complicationsIntraoperative and first 24 hours postoperativeHypotension, bradycardia, postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, prolonged motor block, pruritus and local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST).
Success rate of blockIntraoperative durationa successful block is defined as absence of significant changes in heart rate following surgical induction. Heart rate increase is not\>20% of the basal levels. If the increase is\>20%, the block is accepted as unsuccessful.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactEman Hamdy Abu-Shanab, MSc
eman.hamdy@med.tanta.edu.eg+201005518097

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026