Skip to content

Mindfulness, Group Therapy and Psychosis; Training Decreases Anxiety and Depression

Mindfulness, Group Therapy and Psychosis; Training Decreases Anxiety and Depression in Outpatients With a Psychotic Disorder in a Non-Randomized Within Group Comparison

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04711460
Enrollment
116
Registered
2021-01-15
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2024-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis

Keywords

mindfulness, group therapy

Brief summary

The objective of this non-randomized, within-group comparison was to evaluate the addition of mindfulness as a new technique in an outpatient group therapy program for participants diagnosed with a psychotic spectrum disorder, alongside of cognitive behavioral therapy.

Detailed description

Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), at admission and discharge. The first experiment compared scores of those who received mindfulness training plus standard psychiatric treatment or treatment as usual (TAU) against those who received TAU. The second experiment compared age using matched scores from participants who received mindfulness training plus TAU. Participants attended group therapy for a five-week minimum, and were taught the mindfulness practices of breath, acceptance, observation, remaining non-judgmental, and letting go.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALYounger participants

Younger Participants 19-29 years received TAU + Tx over 5 weeks

BEHAVIORALOlder participants

older participants 30-54 years received TAU + Tx over 5 weeks

BEHAVIORALTAU

Participants received TAU or Treatment As Ususal, Cognitive Behavior Therapy only

BEHAVIORALTAU + MIndfulness practice

Participants received TAU + mindfulness training

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

* All Diagnostic Statistical Manual, Fifth edition, (DSM-5) diagnoses that included a psychosis spectrum disorder

Exclusion criteria

* those lacking symptoms of psychosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 5Five weeksThe Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item survey of how often patients are bothered by symptoms of anxiety. Items are rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is a sum of item scores and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression). Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to approximately 5 weeks. Pre / Post-test scores were compared.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 5Five weeksThe Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item survey of how often patients are bothered by symptoms of depression. Items are rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is a sum of item scores and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression). Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to approximately 5 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)baseline onlyThe Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) adapted to include drug use (CAGE-AID) is a screening tool to assess drug use. Participants are asked to answer yes (score of 1) or no (score of 0) to 4 questions about their drug use. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater substance use disorder. A score of 2 or higher indicates a problem with alcohol or drugs and is clinically significant. Outcome is reported as the number of participants who scored 2 or lower.
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)baseline onlyThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, or C-SSRS, measures four constructs: the severity of ideation, the intensity of ideation, behavior, and lethality. Items are rated on a scale from 0-4: Eligible participants scored at 2 or lower. 1. Only one time 2. A few times 3. A lot 4. All the time 0\) Don't know/Not applicable The Columbia was done prior to being considered for the Outpatient Mental Health program by another licensed mental health staff in another department. Only those who scored at 1-2 would be considered for Outpatient. Outcome is reported as the number of participants who score a one or two on the scale, which means they are considered safe to participate.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

There was no recruitment used for this study.

Pre-assignment details

All participants assessed and enrolled had a DSM-V diagnosis that included psychosis. They participated twice a week for 5 weeks. Pre/post-test scores were collected and compared.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment as Usual CBT
Treatment as usual (TAU group) Participants in the Treatment as usual (TAU) group had Cognitive Behavioral Therapy only.
32
Treatment as Usual + Mindfulness Training
(TAU + TX group) Participants had Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), mindfulness training
32
Younger Participants
Younger participants pre/post test scores were compared
26
Older Participants
Older participants pre/post test scores were compared
26
Total116

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment as Usual CBTTotalOlder ParticipantsYounger ParticipantsTreatment as Usual + Mindfulness Training
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants116 Participants26 Participants26 Participants32 Participants
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 Number of Participants
GAD-7 Scores: Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measures: scores on a scale
6.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
9.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38
11.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13
9.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.39
10.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 Number of Participants
PHQ-9 Scores: Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measures: scores on a scale
9.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
11.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15
12.34 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
11.84 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
12.31 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.19
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: African American
5 participants22 participants4 participants6 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: African continent
2 participants3 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Asian
0 participants7 participants5 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Caucasian
20 participants58 participants13 participants10 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Hispanic
1 participants4 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Jewish
1 participants5 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Native American
3 participants17 participants3 participants6 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants116 participants26 participants26 participants32 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
9 participants39 participants11 participants6 participants13 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
19 participants53 participants11 participants10 participants13 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender
4 participants24 participants4 participants10 participants6 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 320 / 260 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 320 / 260 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 320 / 260 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 5

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item survey of how often patients are bothered by symptoms of anxiety. Items are rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is a sum of item scores and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression). Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to approximately 5 weeks. Pre / Post-test scores were compared.

Time frame: Five weeks

Population: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 number of participants for two studies: Treatment as usual vs TAU + Mindfulness study and the Younger versus older study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment as UsualChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 54.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
TAU + Mindfulness TrainingChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 56.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
Younger ParticipantsChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 53.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Older ParticipantsChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Pre/Post Test at Week 57.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.009ANOVA
p-value: <0.05Tukey Kramer Post-Hoc
Comparison: Threshold of statistically significance was set at p=0.05. No power calculation was conducted.p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Threshold of statistically significance was set at p=0.05. No power calculation was conducted.p-value: 0.454ANOVA
Primary

Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 5

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item survey of how often patients are bothered by symptoms of depression. Items are rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is a sum of item scores and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression). Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to approximately 5 weeks.

Time frame: Five weeks

Population: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scale number of participants in each study: The Treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU + Mindfulness and the Younger versus Older study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment as UsualChange in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 56.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
TAU + Mindfulness TrainingChange in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 56.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.19
Younger ParticipantsChange in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 53.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Older ParticipantsChange in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score From Pre / Post-test at Week 57.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Threshold of statistically significance was set at p=0.05. No power calculation was conducted.p-value: 0.054ANOVA
Comparison: Threshold of statistically significance was set at p=0.05. No power calculation was conducted.p-value: 0.019t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Threshold of statistically significance was set at p=0.05. No power calculation was conducted.p-value: 0.101ANOVA
Secondary

CAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)

The Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) adapted to include drug use (CAGE-AID) is a screening tool to assess drug use. Participants are asked to answer yes (score of 1) or no (score of 0) to 4 questions about their drug use. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater substance use disorder. A score of 2 or higher indicates a problem with alcohol or drugs and is clinically significant. Outcome is reported as the number of participants who scored 2 or lower.

Time frame: baseline only

Population: The CAGE-AID was used to determine sobriety in all participants, and was done before admission to the program. Scores must be below 2 and indicate no problems with alcohol or drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment as UsualCAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)32 Participants
TAU + Mindfulness TrainingCAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)32 Participants
Younger ParticipantsCAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)26 Participants
Older ParticipantsCAGE-Adapted to Include Drug Use (CAGE-AID)26 Participants
Secondary

The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, or C-SSRS, measures four constructs: the severity of ideation, the intensity of ideation, behavior, and lethality. Items are rated on a scale from 0-4: Eligible participants scored at 2 or lower. 1. Only one time 2. A few times 3. A lot 4. All the time 0\) Don't know/Not applicable The Columbia was done prior to being considered for the Outpatient Mental Health program by another licensed mental health staff in another department. Only those who scored at 1-2 would be considered for Outpatient. Outcome is reported as the number of participants who score a one or two on the scale, which means they are considered safe to participate.

Time frame: baseline only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment as UsualThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)32 Participants
TAU + Mindfulness TrainingThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)32 Participants
Younger ParticipantsThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)26 Participants
Older ParticipantsThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)26 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026