Skip to content

Outcomes of a New Trans-epithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Streamlight PRK) Compared to Conventional PRK Procedures

Outcomes of a New Trans-epithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Streamlight PRK) Compared to Conventional PRK Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04710082
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-01-14
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia ≤ -6 Diopters or Myopic Astigmatism ≤ -4 Diopters

Keywords

Photorefractive Keratectomy PRK, Phototherapeutic Keratectomy PTK, Trans-epithelial PRK, Laser Vision Correction LVC

Brief summary

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) involves mechanical or alcohol assisted debridement of the epithelium that leads to potential basement membrane (BM) injury ,with resultant more significant haze and pain compared to laser assisted epithelial removal known as 2 step trans-epithelial PRK (PTK-PRK). Our study is focusing on comparing the outcomes of the conventional 2 step trans-epithelial PTK-PRK to the new single step trans-epithelial PRK (StreamLight PRK, Alcon lab, TX, USA).

Detailed description

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is nowadays one of the commonest refractive procedures in laser vision correction (LVC). PRK differs from laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in that it's a flapless procedure involving the removal of corneal epithelium with different techniques including manual removal , alcohol assisted removal or excimer laser assisted removal with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). Mechanical or alcohol assisted debridement of the epithelium may lead to potential basement membrane (BM) injury ,with resultant more significant haze and pain compared to laser assisted epithelial removal known as 2 step trans-epithelial PRK (PTK-PRK). Single step trans-epithelial PRK allows removing the epithelium and stroma in a single step with a single ablation profile. Previous studies paid particular attention for comparing the 2 step PTK-PRK procedure or the new single step PRK procedure to the conventional PRK procedures involving epithelial removal whether manual or alcohol assisted. The aim of this study is to focus on comparing the different outcomes of the new single step Trans-epithelial PRK (StreamLight Technology) versus the routine 2 step PTK-PRK in terms of postoperative vision, epithelial healing, pain scoring and haze evaluation.

Interventions

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a surgical procedure used by ophthalmic surgeons to treat patients presented with refractive errors and involves corneal epithelial removal followed by application of excimer laser to correct different refractive errors including Myopia, Hyperopia and Astigmatism.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: Candidates for Laser vision correction (LVC) with 1. Myopia up to -6 diopters 2. Myopic astigmatism up to -4 diopters 3. Corneal thinnest location ≥ 500 um and a residual stromal bed ≥ 300um. *

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients not candidates for LVC. 2. Hyperopic patients. 3. Systemic disease that contraindicates LVC. 4. Intra- or post-operative complications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA)6 monthsVisual acuity measurement using Snellen's Acuity Chart and will be expressed as decimal notation
Postoperative Refraction (Spherical equivalent)6 monthsMeasured by Topcon Auto-Keratorefractometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epithelial healing duration2 weeksTime for the epithelium to heal reported in days after PRK procudre
Postoperative pain1 weekVerbal Rating Scale(a series of words commonly used to describe pain (0: no pain, 1: mild pain, 2: moderate pain, 3: severe pain, 4: disabling pain)
Postoperative Haze3 monthsCorneal Haze scoring using slit lamp bio-microscopy according to Fantes scoring system: 0: No haze, completely clear cornea 0.5: Trace haze seen with careful oblique illumination 1. Haze not interfering with visibility of fine iris details 2. Mild obscuration of iris details 3. Moderate obscuration of the iris and lens 4. Complete opacification of the stroma in the area of the scar, anterior chamber is totally obscured

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026